Epidemiological characteristics and outcome of viral respiratory tract infections in the first year after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Adverse outcomes of viral respiratory tract infections (RTI) have been reported in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Using a laboratory-developed multiparameter PCR in a consecutive series of 242 patients, we found the highest incidence of viral RTI in the pre-engraftment phase. The occurrence of multiple episodes of viral RTI or viral pneumonia was significantly associated with a higher hazard of non-relapse mortality in the first year after transplantation. We observed a 90-day mortality of 19.7% after viral RTI, which was significantly different between patient groups stratified according to the ISI score.

Immunologic Monitoring after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: T-SPOT.CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV, Are They the Same?

Despite prophylactic and preemptive strategies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and disease remains major concerns after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In recent years, immunologic monitoring using CMV commercially available IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs) has gained interest to better risk-stratify immunocompromised patients or to guide prophylactic therapy. CMV-IGRA can quantify CMV cell-mediated immunity by measuring the IFN-γ that is released by CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes in the presence of CMV antigens. However, the 2 most widely used CMV-IGRAs, T-SPOT.CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV, had not yet been compared in the setting of an allo-HSCT. In the present study, we performed a method comparison between T-SPOT.CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV at 28 days and 100 days post-allo-HSCT, and to assess predictive values of both tests for CMV reactivation. Twenty-seven patients were included in a bicentric prospective trial. Samples were obtained on days +28 and +100 post-allo-HSCT, and patients' clinical information was collected up to day +270 post-HSCT. Comparisons of methods were performed using Cohen's κ. On day +28 (n = 26) post-allo-HSCT, T-SPOT.CMV yielded 3 positive test results and QuantiFERON-CMV yielded 2 positive results. On day +100 (n = 24), T-SPOT.CMV produced 7 positive test results, and QuantiFERON-CMV produced 9. One discordant result was obtained at day +28 (n = 26), and 6 discordant results were obtained at day +100 (n = 24). Method comparison showed a strong agreement on day +28 (κ = .780; 95% confidence interval [CI], .366 to 1.000) but only a moderate agreement on day +100 (κ = .442; 95% CI, .070 to .814) and in pooled data from both time points (κ = .578; 95% CI, .300-.856). Four clinically significant CMV infections (CS-CMVi) were observed, all occurring after discontinuation of letermovir prophylaxis. None of those 4 patients had a positive result with either test at day +100 (or day +28). Thus, the negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity were very high, at 100% for both tests measured at day +100. Positive predictive values (PPVs) and specificity were considerably lower at day +100 (T-SPOT.CMV: PPV, 23.5%; specificity, 35%; QuantiFERON-CMV: PPV, 26.7%; specificity, 45%). T-SPOT.CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV had only moderate agreement (at day +100) after allo-HSCT. Although these IGRAs are very promising, as shown by their very high NPVs for protection against CS-CMVi, they are not interchangeable. Future research should stipulate which IGRA was used, and future guidelines preferably should be assay-specific. As QuantiFERON-CMV still lacks a large post-allo-HSCT validation study, the moderate agreement with T-SPOT.CMV poses a significant hurdle in the routine implementation of this test.

Infectious diarrhea after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation assessed by a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of infectious diarrhea after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay and assess risk factors for developing infectious diarrhea. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of 140 consecutive allogeneic HCT recipients. Infectious diarrhea was assessed using a laboratory-developed multiplex polymerase chain reaction the first year after transplantation. RESULTS: The incidence rate of infectious diarrhea episodes was 47 per 100 person-years, with the highest rate observed in the pre-engraftment phase. Most episodes were seen as nosocomial infections (38%) and most affected patients (82%) had only one episode of infectious diarrhea. The cumulative incidence of at least one episode of infectious diarrhea was 32% after 1 year. Nonrelapse mortality was higher in transplant recipients with at least one episode of infectious diarrhea (hazard ratio (HR) 2.02, 95% CI = 1.07-3.80). The most frequently observed pathogens were Clostridium difficile, adenovirus, Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter jejuni. Patients with acute lower gastrointestinal graft-vs-host disease stage 3 or 4 (HR 3.68, 95% CI = 1.57-8.63) conferred a higher risk for a first infectious diarrhea episode. CONCLUSION: Infectious diarrhea after allogeneic HCT was seen in about one-third of the patients, mostly as nosocomial infection in the pre-engraftment phase.

Empiric vs Preemptive Antifungal Strategy in High-Risk Neutropenic Patients on Fluconazole Prophylaxis: A Randomized Trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Empiric antifungal therapy is considered the standard of care for high-risk neutropenic patients with persistent fever. The impact of a preemptive, diagnostic-driven approach based on galactomannan screening and chest computed tomography scan on demand on survival and on the risk of invasive fungal disease (IFD) during the first weeks of high-risk neutropenia is unknown. METHODS: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients were randomly assigned to receive caspofungin empirically (arm A) or preemptively (arm B), while receiving fluconazole 400 mg daily prophylactically. The primary end point of this noninferiority study was overall survival (OS) 42 days after randomization. RESULTS: Of 556 patients recruited, 549 were eligible: 275 in arm A and 274 in arm B. Eighty percent of the patients had AML or MDS requiring high-dose chemotherapy, and 93% of them were in the first induction phase. At day 42, the OS was not inferior in arm B (96.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 93.8%-98.3%) when compared with arm A (93.1%; 95% CI, 89.3%-95.5%). The rates of IFDs at day 84 were not significantly different, 7.7% (95% CI, 4.5%-10.8%) in arm B vs 6.6% (95% CI, 3.6%-9.5%) in arm A. The rate of patients who received caspofungin was significantly lower in arm B (27%) than in arm A (63%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The preemptive antifungal strategy was safe for high-risk neutropenic patients given fluconazole as prophylaxis, halving the number of patients receiving antifungals without excess mortality or IFDs. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT01288378; EudraCT 2010-020814-27.

Successful Outcome of Disseminated Fusarium musae Fungemia with Skin Localization Treated with Liposomal Amphotericin B and Voriconazole in a Patient with Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Fusarium spp. may cause invasive disseminated infections in immunocompromised patients, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We describe a case of disseminated fusariosis with fungemia and skin localization caused by Fusarium musae in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia successfully treated using liposomal amphotericin B and voriconazole.

Case report: patient with unexplained high fever and pancytopenia.

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: We present a case of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), giving insight in how to establish diagnosis and start appropiate treatment. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 45-year-old male presented at the emergency ward with high fever and pancytopenia. Repeat bone marrow aspirates showed hemophagocytosis. Extensive work-up with exclusion of other infectious and malignant diseases, eventually lead us to the diagnosis of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. INTERVENTION: The patient was treated with Etoposide, Cyclosporine A, and systemic steroids based on the HLH-2004 protocol. Unfortunately the patient responded very poorly to the treatment with prolonged pancytopenia, leading to central hemorrhage and eventually death. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of hemopagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is difficult and late because of aspecific signs and low incidence. The HLH-criteria can be of use to exclude or confirm diagnosis in unclear cases. Early diagnosis and treatment is crucial given high morbidity and mortality. Therapy depends on type and etiology of the HLH-syndrome. Besides treating the possible triggering factor, Etoposide, steroids, and Cyclosporine A are the mainstays of treatment, sometimes followed by allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. More research in adults is needed.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: a risk-adapted approach.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is nowadays most frequently applied in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It combines chemoradiotherapy with immunotherapy, also known as the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. While it effectively reduces the relapse rate in patients, transplanted in remission, non-relapse mortality (NRM) may counterbalance that beneficial effect. As a result, alloSCT is generally associated with a modest gain in overall survival. Therefore, alloSCT may especially be applied in patients with a relatively high risk of relapse and a relatively low risk of NRM. Here, we discuss how recent findings that have identified and validated specific prognostic factors may affect our decision making for which category of AML-patients alloSCT may especially be indicated.

Advances in the serological diagnosis of invasive Aspergillus infections in patients with haematological disorders.

A reliable diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in patients with haematological malignancies is seldom achieved antemortem. Conventional laboratory diagnostic methods are insensitive and time-consuming, resulting in late diagnosis and treatment and contributing to unacceptably high mortality. As a result, routine antifungal prophylaxis and early empirical treatment have been recommended. However, overtreatment associated with these strategies results in increased toxicity and cost. The use of sensitive and rapid non-culture-based diagnostic assays, such as detection of Aspergillus antigens (galactomannan, beta-D-glucan) or detection of genomic DNA sequences may allow a shift in emphasis from empirical to pre-emptive therapy, especially when substantiated by suggestive radiological findings. These new tools may be used to confirm a presumed diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis, or, when used to screen high-risk patients, may identify an infection at the early stage of disease. The excellent negative predictive value of these assays should convince clinicians to withhold antifungal therapy in persistently febrile neutropenic patients with no other signs of fungal infection. On the other hand, consecutive positive results in a high-risk population should at least trigger a complete diagnostic work-up. This review will focus on the diagnostic utility as well as on the pitfalls of serial screening for the presence of circulating fungal antigens in haematology patients.