ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Taurolidine-citrate(-heparin) lock solutions (TCHL) are suggested as a promising and safe method for the prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). AIM: To investigate the efficacy TCHL for the prevention of CrLABSI in paediatric oncology patients. METHODS: An assessor blinded randomized controlled trial at the Princess Máxima Centre for paediatric oncology, the Netherlands, was performed from 2020-2023. Paediatric oncology patients receiving a tunnelled central venous access device (CVAD) were eligible. A total of 462 patients was required to compare the TCHL to the heparin-only lock (HL). Patients were followed-up for the first 90 days after CVAD insertion. The primary outcome was the incidence of the first CLABSI from CVAD insertion until the end of follow-up. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. FINDINGS: In total, 232 were randomized in the HL and 231 in the TCHL-group. A total of 47 CLABSIs were observed. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that a CLABSI was observed in 26 (11.2%) of the HL-group patients versus 21 (9.1%) of the TCHL-group patients; incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.81 (CI95%0.46-1.45), in favour of the TCHL-group. The per-protocol analysis showed that a CLABSI was observed in 10 (7.9%) of the HL-group patients versus 6 (4.8%) of the TCHL-group patients; IRR of 0.59 (CI95%0.21-1.62) in favour of the TCHL-group. Adverse events were more common in the TCHL-group but rarely reported. CONCLUSION: No difference was detected between the TCHL and HL in the incidence of CLABSI in paediatric oncology patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05740150.
ABSTRACT
The incidence of central venous catheter (CVC)-related bloodstream infections is high in patients requiring a long-term CVC. Therefore, infection prevention is of the utmost importance. The aim of this study was to provide an updated overview of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of taurolidine containing lock solutions (TL) to other lock solutions for the prevention of CVC-related bloodstream infections in all patient populations. On 15th February 2021, PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs comparing the efficacy of TLs for the prevention of CVC-related bloodstream infections with other lock solutions. Exclusion criteria were non-RCTs, studies describing <10 patients and studies using TLs as treatment. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. A random effects model was used to pool individual study incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the following factors: CVC indication, comparator lock and bacterial isolates cultured. A total of 14 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis describing 1219 haemodialysis, total parenteral nutrition and oncology patients. The pooled IRR estimated for all patient groups together (nine studies; 918 patients) was 0.30 (95% confidence interval 0.19-0.46), favouring the TLs. Adverse events (10 studies; 867 patients) were mild and scarce. The quality of the evidence was limited due to a high risk of bias and indirectness of evidence. The use of TLs might be promising for the prevention of CVC-related bloodstream infections. Large-scale RCTs are needed to draw firm conclusions on the efficacy of TLs.
