Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 11(7): 351-6, 1990 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2376660

ABSTRACT

An anonymous national survey of a representative population of healthcare workers who were thought likely to have frequent and intensive exposures to blood and other body fluids (certified nurse-midwives [CNMs]), was conducted to assess the type and frequency of self-reported occupational exposures to blood and body fluids experienced, the extent to which barrier precautions and other infection control measures were used, whether or not reported use of barriers was associated with a lower perceived rate of exposures and factors that influenced the use of infection control procedures. Of those responding, 74% had soiled their hands with blood at least one time in the preceding six months, 51% had splashed blood or amniotic fluid in their faces and 24% reported one or more needlestick injuries during that same period. Our study also found evidence of an association between the practice of needle recapping and the occurrence of needlestick injury (p = .003). Despite a high level of training and knowledge, only 55% reported routinely practicing universal precautions (UPs). Several factors that potentially influenced the use of UPs were studied, including healthcare worker perceptions of risk of occupational bloodborne infection, knowledge of routes of transmission of bloodborne pathogens and rationale for not using appropriate barriers. Our data suggest that occupational exposures occur frequently and that healthcare workers' (HCWs') perceptions of risk for occupational infection play an important role in influencing use of UPs. This study emphasizes the importance of developing new strategies for UP training.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Environmental Exposure , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Nurse Midwives , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/transmission , Certification , Hepatitis B/transmission , Humans , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
J Nurse Midwifery ; 34(6): 309-17, 1989.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2614519

ABSTRACT

A questionnaire was designed with these objectives: (1) to determine the frequency and type of adverse exposures experienced by certified nurse-midwives (CNMs); (2) to determine the extent to which CNMs used recommended precautions to prevent such incidents; and (3) to identify the sources used for obtaining information on AIDS. The questionnaire was mailed to all CNMs with the exception of associate and student members of the American College of Midwives. A response rate of 1,784/2,963 (60.2%) was obtained. These midwives reported frequent exposures to blood and body fluids. Sixty-five percent reported being soaked to the skin with blood or amniotic fluid; 50.7% had face-splashes with blood or amniotic fluid; and 24.0% experienced one or more needlestick(s). Only 55.1% reported using Universal Precautions (UP). Interference with the midwife-client relationship was identified most frequently as the reason for not using UP. Strategies need to be developed for midwives that will increase the use of UP and minimize the frequency of adverse exposures, while maintaining a caring midwife-client relationship.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Environmental Exposure , Nurse Midwives/statistics & numerical data , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/transmission , Attitude of Health Personnel , Hand Disinfection , Humans , Needles , Protective Clothing/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...