Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 124(5): 942-8.e1-9, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19748656

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin D(2) is a proinflammatory mediator believed to be important in asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR). Allelic variants in the prostaglandin D(2) receptor type 1 (DP1) gene (PTGDR) have been suggested to be associated with asthma susceptibility. OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the efficacy of the DP1 antagonist laropiprant (alone or with montelukast) in asthma and seasonal AR and explore whether sequence variations in PTGDR are associated with asthma severity. METHODS: For asthma, in a double-blind crossover study, 100 patients with persistent asthma were randomized to placebo or laropiprant, 300 mg/d for 3 weeks, followed by addition of montelukast, 10 mg/d for 2 weeks. PTGDR promoter haplotypes were categorized as high, medium, or low transcriptional efficiency. The primary efficacy end point was FEV(1). For AR, in a double-blind parallel-group study, 767 patients sensitized to a regionally prevalent fall allergen with symptomatic fall rhinitis were allocated to laropiprant, 25 mg/d or 100 mg/d; cetirizine, 10mg/d; or placebo for 2 weeks. The primary end point was the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score. RESULTS: For asthma, no significant differences in FEV(1) or asthma symptoms were noted for laropiprant versus placebo or laropiprant plus montelukast vs montelukast (differences between montelukast and placebo: P

Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Indoles/therapeutic use , Receptors, Prostaglandin/antagonists & inhibitors , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Acetates/administration & dosage , Acetates/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Allergic Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage , Asthma/genetics , Cetirizine/administration & dosage , Cetirizine/therapeutic use , Cross-Over Studies , Cyclopropanes , Double-Blind Method , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Haplotypes/genetics , Humans , Indoles/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Quinolines/administration & dosage , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Receptors, Prostaglandin/genetics , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/genetics , Sulfides , Young Adult
2.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 97(1): 98-104, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16892789

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Leukotriene modifiers have been shown to protect against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) with repeated, chronic dosing. OBJECTIVE: To study the onset and duration of protection against EIB after a single dose of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist. METHODS: In this randomized, crossover, double-blind study, 51 adult asthma patients with EIB (> or = 20% postexercise decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]) received a single oral dose of montelukast (10 mg), or placebo followed by exercise challenge 2, 12, and 24 hours after dosing. The primary end point was maximum percentage decrease in FEV1 from preexercise baseline during 60 minutes after the 2-hour challenge. RESULTS: At 2, 12, and 24 hours after dosing, the maximum decrease in FEV1 was 10.8% +/- 7.9%, 8.4% +/- 7.5%, and 8.3% +/- 7.3% for montelukast and 22.3% +/- 13.1%, 16.1% +/- 10.2%, and 16.9% +/- 11.7% for placebo, respectively (P < or = .001 at each time point). Postexercise recovery was quicker with montelukast than with placebo (P < or = .001); mean (95% confidence interval) differences were -26.8 minutes (-35.1 to -18.4 minutes), -16.0 minutes (-22.9 to -9.2 minutes), and -17.4 minutes (-24.9 to -9.9 minutes) at the 3 time points, respectively. At all time points, area under the curve for percentage decrease in FEV1 during 60 minutes after exercise was smaller after montelukast (P < or = .001); montelukast protected more patients against EIB (P < or = .001). Fewer patients required postexercise beta-agonist rescue at 2 hours after dosing with montelukast (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Montelukast provided significant protection against EIB as soon as 2 hours after a single oral dose, with persistent benefit up to 24 hours.


Subject(s)
Acetates/therapeutic use , Asthma, Exercise-Induced/prevention & control , Leukotriene Antagonists/therapeutic use , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Acetates/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adrenergic beta-Agonists/therapeutic use , Adult , Area Under Curve , Asthma, Exercise-Induced/drug therapy , Cross-Over Studies , Cyclopropanes , Double-Blind Method , Exercise Test , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Leukotriene Antagonists/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Quinolines/administration & dosage , Sulfides , Time Factors
3.
Headache ; 46(2): 264-75, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16492236

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of rofecoxib and ibuprofen for acute migraine treatment. BACKGROUND: Rofecoxib was effective and well tolerated in a previous study of treatment of a single migraine attack. We sought to replicate these findings for a single attack and also study the clinical profile of rofecoxib in the acute treatment of multiple migraine attacks. Ibuprofen was included as a reference nonselective NSAID. METHODS: Adult migraineurs (n = 783) treated one migraine attack with either rofecoxib (25 or 50 mg), ibuprofen 400 mg, or placebo in a randomized, double-blind study. Patients could elect to enroll in a 3-month double-blind extension phase. RESULTS: In the single-attack phase, headache relief at 2 hours postdose was reported by 59.4%, 62.2%, and 57.7% of patients who took rofecoxib 25 mg, rofecoxib 50 mg, and ibuprofen 400 mg, respectively, versus 30.5% for placebo (all P < .001 vs placebo). The active drugs were statistically superior to placebo on a variety of additional measures. In the extension phase, the mean percentage of patients' attacks with headache relief at 2 hours postdose was 61.8% for rofecoxib 25 mg, 65.4% for rofecoxib 50 mg, and 59.3% for ibuprofen 400 mg. The mean percentage of patients' attacks with 24-hour sustained headache relief was greater for rofecoxib 50 mg (52.0%) than for rofecoxib 25 mg (47.8%, P < .050) or ibuprofen (39.0%, P < .010). In the single-attack phase, the adverse event rate was higher for rofecoxib 50 mg (37.8%) than placebo (27.8%, P < .050); rates were similar to placebo for rofecoxib 25 mg (32.0%, n.s.) and ibuprofen 400 mg (28.1%, n.s.). In the extension phase, treatment groups had similar adverse event rates. CONCLUSIONS: Rofecoxib 25 and 50 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg were effective and generally well tolerated in the acute treatment of migraine.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Lactones/therapeutic use , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Serotonin Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use , Sulfones/therapeutic use , Acute Disease , Adult , Dizziness/chemically induced , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nausea/chemically induced , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...