ABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infection caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 virus that led to a pandemic. Acute manifestations of COVID-19 include fever, cough, dyspnea, respiratory failure, pneumonitis, anosmia, thromboembolic events, cardiogenic shock, renal injury, ischemic strokes, encephalitis, and cutaneous eruptions, especially of hands or feet. Prolonged symptoms, unpredictable recoveries, and chronic sequelae (long COVID) sometimes emerge even for some people who survive the initial illness. Sequelae such as fatigue occasionally persist even for those with only mild to moderate cases. There is much to learn about postacute COVID-19 dyspnea, anosmia, psychosis, thyroiditis, cardiac arrhythmia, and/or multisystem inflammatory response syndrome in children. Determining prognoses is imprecise. Examining patient databases about those who have survived COVID-19 is warranted. Multidisciplinary teams are assessing such disease databases to better understand longer-term complications and guide treatment.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Humans , Incidence , Pandemics , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Post-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeABSTRACT
Rheumatology practice, during Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has faced multifaceted challenges. Rheumatologists routinely prescribe immunosuppressant medications to their patients with multisystem autoimmune rheumatic diseases who are concerned about the increased risk of acquiring COVID-19 infection and are anxious to know if they should continue or hold these medications. Rheumatologists are often inundated by calls from their patients and physician colleagues caring for COVID-19 patients in hospitals, about how to manage the immunosuppression. Physicians face the challenging task of keeping up with the most up-to-date information on COVID-19. There are uncertainties about the mode of spread, clinical features, management options as well as long-term complications of COVID-19. Data are rapidly evolving and different studies on treatment options are showing contradictory results. It is known that viral illnesses can trigger a flare-up of underlying rheumatic disease that was previously in remission. To further complicate the scenario, some of the immunosuppressants have shown to have antiviral properties. This has created dilemma in the light of current COVID-19 crisis, as whether to continue or stop the immunosuppressive agents which could be essential to prevent complications of the rheumatic diseases including organ failure but also there is concern about acquiring COVID-19 or developing serious infection. Until we get an effective vaccine, immunosuppressant management for rheumatic diseases as well as other autoimmune diseases and transplants will pose difficult questions. This article is an attempt to review and understand COVID-19 and its impact on the immune system with special emphasis on managing medications used for autoimmune rheumatic diseases. We have provided general guidance about decision making, in regards to the immunosuppressive agents used in rheumatology practice with an understanding that this may change in near future.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Cytokine Release Syndrome/immunology , Deprescriptions , Disease Management , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Drug TreatmentABSTRACT
Health care has become increasingly fragmented, partly due to advancing medical technology. Patients are often managed by various specialty teams when presenting with symptoms that could be manifestations of different diseases. Approximately one third of them are referred to specialists, at over half for outpatient appointments. Fatigue, pain, depression, dry mouth, headaches, and arthralgia are common complaints and frequently require referral to specialist physicians. Differential diagnoses include fibromyalgia (FM), Sjogren's syndrome (SS), and depression. Evaluations involve various sub-specialist especially physicians like those practicing pain management, rheumatology, and psychiatry. Thresholds for referring vary. Patients sometime feel lost in a 'medical maze'. Disagreement is frequent between specialties regarding management. Each discipline has its own diagnostic and treatment protocols and there is little consensus about shared decision-making. Communication between doctors could improve continuity. There are many differences and similarities in the pathophysiology, symptomatology, diagnosis, and treatment of fibromyalgia, Sjogren's syndrome, and depression. Understanding the associations between fibromyalgia, Sjogren's syndrome and depression should improve clinical outcome via a common holistic approach.
Subject(s)
Depression/complications , Fibromyalgia/complications , Sjogren's Syndrome/complications , Depression/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Fatigue/complications , Fibromyalgia/classification , Fibromyalgia/diagnosis , Humans , Severity of Illness Index , Sjogren's Syndrome/classification , Sjogren's Syndrome/diagnosisABSTRACT
Forced normalization is the emergence of psychoses following the establishment of seizure control in an uncontrolled epilepsy patient. Two illustrative clinical vignettes are provided about people with epilepsy that was newly controlled and followed by emergence of a psychosis; symptoms appeared only after attaining ictal control. For recognition and differential diagnosis purposes, understanding forced normalization is important in clinical practice.
ABSTRACT
Bipolar disease is often misdiagnosed, sometimes repeatedly. The screening tool and tips you'll find here will help you identify patients without delay.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic useABSTRACT
There has been a recent increase in the number of clinical trials and treatment options for bipolar disorder. This research has resulted in new treatment options. Most second-generation antipsychotics have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of mania, both in monotherapy and as adjuncts to mood stabilizers. For bipolar depression, nearly all randomized, placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated that antidepressants do not provide any additional benefit to ongoing mood stabilizers. Additionally, antidepressants carry a risk of destabilization of bipolar disorder with an increase in mania, cycling, and chronic irritable dysphoria. Newer non-antidepressant treatments for depression include quetiapine, lamotrigine, modafinil, and pramipexole. These agents are effective for acute treatment and appear to be effective in maintenance. The least-studied phase of bipolar disorder is the maintenance phase. The use of multiple agents appears to be superior to monotherapy in relapse prevention. Despite the many advances in the pharmacotherapy of bipolar disorder, the overall prognosis of this severe illness does not appear to have changed.