Exposure to potting soils and compost material as potential sources of Legionella pneumophilia in Australia.

Legionnaires' disease is a form of atypical community-acquired pneumonia usually caused by Legionella pneumophilia, which is typically associated with exposure to tower cooling or water systems. In Australia, Legionnaires' disease is more commonly caused by Legionella longbaechae, which is typically associated with exposure to soil or compost materials, and the presence of Legionella pneumophilia is less recognized. We report a sporadic case of Legionnaires' disease caused by Legionella pneumophilia serogroup 1 that was contracted following exposure to potting mix and topsoil.

Spirometry in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Exacerbation of COPD Accurately Predicts Post Discharge Airflow Obstruction.

Purpose: Objective documentation of airflow obstruction is often lacking inhospitalized patients treated for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). The utility of spirometry performed in hospitalized patients to identify airflow obstruction, and thus a diagnosis of COPD, is unclear. Our aim was to compare inpatient spirometry, performed during an AECOPD, with outpatient spirometry. Methods: A retrospective analysis of data from patients enrolled in an AECOPD care plan was performed. As part of the plan, patients underwent inpatient spirometry to establish a COPD diagnosis and outpatient clinic spirometry within 4 weeks of hospital discharge to confirm it. Data analyzed included forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), slow vital capacity (SVC) and FEV1/ vital capacity (VC). Obstruction was defined by FEV1/VC<0.70. Results: A total of 159 patients (mean age 63.2 +/- 10.5 years) had corresponding in- and outpatient spirometry. The median days between inpatient and outpatient spirometry was 12 (interquartile range [IQR] 9-16). Inpatient spirometry had a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 24%, positive predictive value of 83% and negative predictive value of 53% for predicting outpatient obstruction. The area under curve for using inpatient spirometry was 0.82. The mean difference between inpatient and outpatient FEV1 was 0.44 +/- 0.03 liters or 17.3 +/- 1.13 % predicted (p<0.0001) for FEV1. Conclusions: Inpatient spirometry accurately predicts outpatient airflow obstruction, thus providing an opportunity to identify patients admitted with suspected AECOPD who have no prior spirometric documentation.

Suboptimal Inspiratory Flow Rates Are Associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and All-Cause Readmissions.

RATIONALE: Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are prescribed after hospitalization for acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD). Peak inspiratory flow (PIF) affects DPI delivery. OBJECTIVES: To study the impact of PIF on readmission after hospitalization for AECOPD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of hospitalized patients, enrolled in an AECOPD care plan, was performed. Data analyzed included PIF, age, sex, length of stay, Charlson Comorbidity Index, COPD Assessment Test score, modified Medical Research Council score, percent predicted FEV1, FVC, and inspiratory capacity. A PIF equal to and less than 60 L/min was defined as suboptimal (sPIF). Outcome measures included 30- and 90-day COPD and all-cause readmissions, and days to next COPD and all-cause readmissions. RESULTS: Of the 123 subjects, 52% (n = 64) had sPIF. They had greater COPD Assessment Test scores (29.1 ± 5.9 vs. 25.3 ± 8.7; P = 0.0073), rates of 90-day COPD readmissions (28.1 vs. 13.6%; P = 0.048), fewer median days to COPD (63.5 [interquartile range (IQR), 21-89.8] vs. 144 [IQR, 66-218]; P = 0.002) and all-cause readmissions (65.5 [IQR, 24.3-107.3] vs. 101 [IQR, 54.5-205.5]; P = 0.009). PIF was the only variable (P = 0.041) that predicted days to COPD readmission in a multivariate model incorporating age, sex, percent predicted FEV1, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and inspiratory flow group. In a group of patients with sPIF (n = 22), all-cause and COPD 30- and 90-day readmission rates were significantly lower for those discharged with nebulizer compared with DPI therapy. CONCLUSIONS: sPIF is common during AECOPD and predicts all-cause and COPD readmissions. Patients with sPIF may benefit from nebulized therapies. We recommend checking PIF in patients hospitalized for AECOPD for selection of delivery devices.

Review of drug safety and efficacy of arformoterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

INTRODUCTION: The global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease guidelines recommend maintenance therapy using long-acting bronchodilators for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have daily symptoms. Arformoterol is the (R, R) - enantiomer of the racemic formoterol and is more potent than (R, R/ S, S) - formoterol. AREAS COVERED: Currently, arformoterol is one of two nebulized long-acting ß-agonists on the market. It has a low incidence of cardiovascular side effects with incidence of arrhythmia and ischemia similar to placebo. ß-adrenergic adverse effects are infrequent, numerically lower than formoterol, but have a quicker onset of action than salmeterol. There was no observed clinical tolerance over 12 months. arformoterol is safe in combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids, tiotropium and rescue inhalers. A 12-month Phase IV trial found no increased risk of respiratory death or COPD exacerbation-related hospitalizations. arformoterol can potentially benefit patients with hyperinflation and low inspiratory flow rates. EXPERT OPINION: The introduction of the centers for medicare and medicaid services penalization for COPD readmissions may boost the appeal of long-acting bronchodilators as new discharge medications. With the advent of ultra long-acting bronchodilators, its potential as a once daily agent in isolation or combination with these new therapies needs further study.