Electroconvulsive therapy as viewed by german psychiatrists: a comparison of 3 subgroups.

OBJECTIVES: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a stigmatized treatment even among doctors. This restrains the accessibility of ECT for patients in need of this treatment. In Germany, the utilization of ECT is low as compared with other Western industrialized countries. However, increasing application rates of ECT in Germany indicate some degree of support from psychiatrists. Therefore, the present study examined the current attitudes among 3 subgroups of psychiatrists toward ECT. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent through e-mail to 423 psychiatric hospitals in the Federal Republic of Germany and through facsimile to 2550 specialists working in private practice. One hundred eighty-three (43%) of the institutions applied ECT (ECT facilities) and 240 (57%) institutions did not apply (non-ECT facilities). RESULTS: Nine hundred eighty-three answers could be evaluated. One hundred fifteen (63%) of the 183 ECT facilities, 118 (49%) of the 240 non-ECT facilities, and 751 (30%) of the 2500 specialists working in private practice responded. The general attitude toward ECT was favorable: most of the participants agreed that ECT is used less often than it should be to best serve patients' interests (61%-89%) and that it should be applied more often (54%-79%). Most of the participants thought that the image of ECT has improved among psychiatrists (61%-74%) but has not changed among fellow physicians, patients, and the general population. CONCLUSIONS: A surprisingly positive attitude toward ECT was found in our study among all 3 groups of German psychiatrists, which might further help improve patients' access to this treatment.

Accessibility, standards and challenges of electroconvulsive therapy in Western industrialized countries: a German example.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to document the present situation of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in Germany, compare its handling with regard to other industrialized countries and with regard to a survey 12 years ago. METHODS: A questionnaire on the frequency and type of administration of ECT in 2008 was sent electronically to 423 psychiatric hospitals. As needed, up to five reminders were carried out by telephone. On this occasion, the question of whether ECT is administered, could be clarified for each hospital. RESULTS: A total of 43% (183/423) of hospitals declared to administer ECT; 63% (115/183) reported nearly 20,000 treatments. A total incidence of 30,000 treatments performed on 2800 individual patients was estimated. This means that 3.4 patients per 10(5) inhabitants, 0.4‰ of all depressed patients, and about 1% of depressed inpatients, are treated with ECT in Germany. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of application has increased during the last 12 years by a factor of more than 2.5 in Germany. In Western industrialized countries, numbers vary by a factor of more than 10 amongst the countries with a slow trend of equalization. The mode of implementation and the areas of conflict in which the therapy stands seem to be similar.