The timing of development and subsequent clinical course of heart failure after a myocardial infarction.

AIMS: Myocardial infarction (MI) is a common cause of heart failure (HF), which may develop early and persist or resolve, or develop late. The cumulative incidence, persistence, and resolution of HF after MI are poorly described. The aim of this study is to describe the natural history and prognosis of HF after an MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with a death or discharge diagnosis of MI in 1998 were identified from records of hospitals providing services to a local community of 600 000 people. Records were scrutinized to identify the development of HF, defined as signs and symptoms consistent with that diagnosis and treated with loop diuretics. HF was considered to have resolved if diuretics could be stopped without recurrent symptoms. Totally, 896 patients were identified of whom 54% had died by December 2005. During the index admission, 199 (22.2%) patients died, many with HF, and a further 182 (20.3%) patients developed HF that persisted until discharge, of whom 121 died subsequent to discharge. Of 74 patients with transient HF that resolved before discharge, 41 had recurrent HF and 38 died during follow-up. After discharge, 145 (33%) patients developed HF for the first time, of whom 76 died during follow-up. Overall, of 281 deaths occurring after discharge, 235 (83.6%) were amongst inpatients who first developed HF. CONCLUSION: The development of HF precedes death in most patients who die in the short- or long-term following an MI. Prevention of HF, predominantly by reducing the extent of myocardial damage and recurrent MI, and subsequent management could have a substantial impact on prognosis.

Relationship of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to prognosis and other prognostic markers in outpatients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory markers are increased in chronic heart failure (CHF), including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), but there is little information on its relationship to prognosis or other prognostic markers. We aimed to investigate the relationship between hsCRP and prognosis in patients with CHF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). METHODS: Patients with CHF and LVSD (n = 957), but without infection or inflammatory disease, were identified. Patients had their medical history taken, underwent physical examination, had electrocardiographic and echocardiographic assessment, and had a 6-minute corridor walk test (6MWT) and blood tests, including hsCRP and N-terminal pro-B natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP). RESULTS: Patients with worse New York Heart Association class (P = .02), shorter 6-minute corridor walk test distance (P < .001), higher NT-pro-BNP levels (P < .001), anemia (P < .001), and renal dysfunction (P < .001), but not lower LV ejection fraction, had higher plasma concentrations of hsCRP. Patients with a CRP of >11.0 pg/mL had a hazard ratio for death of 3.0 compared with those with a CRP of <2.8 pg/mL (P < .001). Of 402 patients who had a second sample taken for hsCRP at 1 year, 46% showed a substantial change from baseline levels. Marked increases in hsCRP were associated with a fall in hemoglobin level. NT-pro-BNP was noted to be a more accurate prognostic marker than hsCRP (area under the curve of 0.74 compared with 0.67 for hsCRP, P < .05). CONCLUSION: Patients with CHF and LVSD have increased serum concentrations of hsCRP that are related to functional limitation and prognosis but not to the severity of LV ejection fraction.