Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Heart Vessels ; 38(2): 274-283, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36251050

ABSTRACT

In this prospective observational study, we investigated the impact of geriatric syndromes and frailty on mortality and evaluated the prognostic value of different frailty, nutritional, and geriatric assessment tools in high-risk patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR) who were evaluated for mitral valve therapies including surgical, interventional, and conservative treatment options. We prospectively assessed multiple parameters including the CONUT Score, the Katz Index of independence in activities of daily living (ADL), the Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP), and the Essential Frailty Toolset (EFT) Score in 127 patients with severe symptomatic MR requiring surgical/interventional treatment versus conservative monitoring. We compared their predictive value on mortality including multivariate regression analysis to identify the most suitable tool to predict outcomes in these patient groups. The frailty syndrome as assessed with the CONUT Score, Katz Index, EFT Score, and FFP was associated with higher rates of comorbidities, significantly higher risk scores such as logistic EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II, and STS-PROM, and significantly higher mortality rates. The EFT Score and FFP were independent predictors of one-year all-cause mortality in our study cohort (EFT Score: HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.2; p = 0.01; FFP: HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.1; p = 0.015). Geriatric syndromes and frailty are associated with increased mortality in high-risk patients with symptomatic severe MR. The EFT Score and the FFP were independent predictors of one-year all-cause mortality.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Frailty , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Humans , Aged , Frailty/complications , Frailty/diagnosis , Frail Elderly , Activities of Daily Living , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Syndrome , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Risk Factors , Geriatric Assessment
2.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 13(12): 1471-1480, 2020 06 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32553337

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether protamine administration for heparin reversal after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) reduces bleeding complications and affects patient outcomes. BACKGROUND: Occurrence of major bleeding complications in patients undergoing TAVR is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS: This study included 873 patients undergoing TAVR, of whom 677 received protamine for heparin reversal. Standard access management included the use of pre-closure devices, manual compression, and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or implantation of a covered stent graft, if necessary. The study complied with Good Clinical Practice guidelines and was approved by the local ethics committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. RESULTS: The primary endpoint, a composite of 30-day all-cause mortality and life-threatening and major bleeding, occurred less frequently in the protamine administration group (3.2%) compared with the control group (8.7%) (p = 0.003). This was driven mainly by lower rates of life-threatening and major bleeding in the protamine group (0.1% vs. 2.6% [p < 0.001] and 1.0% vs. 4.1% [p = 0.008], respectively). Furthermore, protamine administration resulted in a significantly shorter hospital stay (11.1 ± 5.8 days vs. 12.7 ± 7.8 days; p = 0.05). In the overall cohort, stroke was observed in 1.9% and myocardial infarction in 0.2% of patients, with no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that only protamine administration (odds ratio: 0.24; 95% confidence interval: 0.10 to 0.58; p = 0.001) and acute kidney injury (odds ratio: 5.82; 95% confidence interval: 2.02 to 16.77; p = 0.001) were independently associated with the primary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Protamine administration resulted in significantly lower rates of life-threatening and major bleeding complications compared with patients without heparin reversal. Occurrence of stroke and myocardial infarction was not increased by protamine administration.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Catheterization, Peripheral , Femoral Artery , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Heparin Antagonists/administration & dosage , Heparin/administration & dosage , Protamines/administration & dosage , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral/mortality , Female , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/mortality , Heparin/adverse effects , Heparin Antagonists/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Patient Safety , Protamines/adverse effects , Punctures , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...