G2 and spindle assembly checkpoint adaptation, and tetraploidy arrest: implications for intrinsic and chemically induced genomic instability.

While checkpoints that act in S-phase are essential to the maintenance of genomic stability, these checkpoints do not act alone. Additionally, G2 DNA damage checkpoints, the spindle assembly checkpoint, and a post-mitotic G1 tetraploidy checkpoint act subsequent to DNA replication to ensure genetic fidelity in cell division. In this review, we will examine how these checkpoints cooperate in the maintenance of genomic stability in response to either DNA damage or cytoskeletal disruption. Since the G2 and spindle assembly checkpoints are subject to adaptation, we will discuss how the G1 tetraploidy checkpoint acts in concert with these checkpoints to mediate stable arrest. We will also probe the relationship of these checkpoints by exploring common features of their regulation. Finally, the consequences of malfunction of these checkpoints for both intrinsic and chemically induced genomic instability will be examined. Among these consequences are aneuploidization, extranumerary centrosomes, and micronucleation.

Arrest of mammalian fibroblasts in G1 in response to actin inhibition is dependent on retinoblastoma pocket proteins but not on p53.

p53 and the retinoblastoma (RB) pocket proteins are central to the control of progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. The RB pocket protein family is downstream of p53 and controls S-phase entry. Disruption of actin assembly arrests nontransformed mammalian fibroblasts in G1. We show that this arrest requires intact RB pocket protein function, but surprisingly does not require p53. Thus, mammalian fibroblasts with normal pocket protein function reversibly arrest in G1 on exposure to actin inhibitors regardless of their p53 status. By contrast, pocket protein triple knockout mouse embryo fibroblasts and T antigen-transformed rat embryo fibroblasts lacking both p53 and RB pocket protein function do not arrest in G1. Fibroblasts are very sensitive to actin inhibition in G1 and arrest at drug concentrations that do not affect cell adhesion or cell cleavage. Interestingly, G1 arrest is accompanied by inhibition of surface ruffling and by induction of NF2/merlin. The combination of failure of G1 control and of tetraploid checkpoint control can cause RB pocket protein-suppressed cells to rapidly become aneuploid and die after exposure to actin inhibitors, whereas pocket protein-competent cells are spared. Our results thus establish that RB pocket proteins can be uniquely targeted for tumor chemotherapy.

G1 tetraploidy checkpoint and the suppression of tumorigenesis.

Checkpoints suppress improper cell cycle progression to ensure that cells maintain the integrity of their genome. During mitosis, a metaphase checkpoint requires the integration of all chromosomes into a metaphase array in the mitotic spindle prior to mitotic exit. Still, mitotic errors occur in mammalian cells with a relatively high frequency. Metaphase represents the last point of control in mitosis. Once the cell commits to anaphase there are no checkpoints to sense segregation defects. In this context, we will explore our recent finding that non-transformed mammalian cells have a checkpoint that acts subsequent to mitotic errors to block the proliferation of cells that have entered G1 with tetraploid status. This arrest is dependent upon both p53 and pRb, and may represent an important function of both p53 and pRb as tumor suppressors. Further, we discuss the possibility that this mechanism may similarly impose G1 arrest in cells that become aneuploid through errors in mitosis.

Multiple centrosomes arise from tetraploidy checkpoint failure and mitotic centrosome clusters in p53 and RB pocket protein-compromised cells.

A high degree of aneuploidy characterizes the majority of human tumors. Aneuploid status can arise through mitotic or cleavage failure coupled with failure of tetraploid G(1) checkpoint control, or through deregulation of centrosome number, thus altering the number of mitotic spindle poles. p53 and the RB pocket proteins are important to the control of G(1) progression, and p53 has previously been suggested as important to the control of centrosome duplication. We demonstrate here that neither suppression of p53 nor of the RB pocket protein family directly generates altered centrosome numbers in any of several mammalian primary cell lines. Instead, amplification of centrosome number occurs in two steps. The first step is failure to arrest at a G(1) tetraploidy checkpoint after failure to segregate the genome in mitosis, and the second step is clustering of centrosomes at a single spindle pole in subsequent tetraploid or aneuploid mitosis. The trigger for these events is mitotic or cleavage failure that is independent of p53 or RB status. Finally, we find that mouse embryo fibroblasts spontaneously enter tetraploid G(1), explaining the previous demonstration of centrosome amplification by p53 abrogation alone in these cells.