ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have increased risk of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers, including cervical and anal cancer. In this cross-sectional clinical study, we investigated the prevalence of cervical high-risk HPV (hrHPV) and low-risk (lrHPV), risk factors for cervical hrHPV infection, and the prevalence of cervical and anal hrHPV co-infection in KTRs and immunocompetent controls. METHODS: During 2016-2017, we recruited 125 female KTRs and 125 female immunocompetent controls from one dermatology department (KTRs and controls) and five nephrology departments (KTRs) in Denmark. Liquid-based cervical and anal cytology samples were tested for HPV DNA using the INNO-LiPA test and participants answered a questionnaire on lifestyle. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using logistic regression, adjusting for age, lifetime sexual partners, smoking, and (in models concerning anal HPV) receptive anal sex. RESULTS: KTRs had higher prevalence of cervical hrHPV than controls (35.5% vs. 18.2; ORadjusted = 2.9, 95% CI, 1.5-5.5). In contrast, the prevalence of lrHPV was similar in KTRs and controls (25.6% vs. 23.1; ORadjusted = 1.2, 95% CI, 0.7-2.3). KTRs were more likely than controls to have cervical and anal hrHPV co-infection (27.3% vs. 6.6%, ORadjusted = 6.3, 95% CI, 2.7-15.0). CONCLUSIONS: Female KTRs had high prevalence of cervical hrHPV, and co-infection with anal and cervical hrHPV was common. Our results underline that KTRs are an important target group for preventive efforts against HPV-related diseases.
Subject(s)
Coinfection , Kidney Transplantation , Papillomavirus Infections , Female , Humans , Human Papillomavirus Viruses , Coinfection/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Denmark/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Renal transplant recipients have increased risk of human papilloma virus-related anogenital (pre)cancers. Less is known about their risk of anogenital warts. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence and odds of anogenital warts in renal transplant recipients compared with immunocompetent controls, and to assess risk factors for intra- and perianal warts in renal transplant recipients. The study examined 248 renal transplant recipients and 250 controls for cutaneous and mucosal anogenital warts. Participants completed a questionnaire on lifestyle and sexual habits. For external anogenital warts (including penile, vulvar and perianal warts), renal transplant recipients had higher prevalence and odds than controls, both in men (8.1% vs 1.6%, adjusted odds ratio (ORadjusted)=5.09, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.03-25.04) and women (11.3% vs 1.6%, ORadjusted=8.09, 95% CI 1.69-38.82). For intra-anal warts, there was no clear pattern of higher odds in renal transplant recipients than controls. Current smoking and having had receptive anal sex increased the risk of intra-/perianal warts in renal transplant recipients. In conclusion, renal transplant recipients in this study had higher odds of external anogenital warts than controls.
Subject(s)
Anus Diseases , Condylomata Acuminata , Kidney Transplantation , Papillomavirus Infections , Warts , Anus Diseases/diagnosis , Anus Diseases/epidemiology , Condylomata Acuminata/diagnosis , Condylomata Acuminata/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Warts/diagnosis , Warts/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Renal transplant recipients (RTRs) have increased risk of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers, including anal cancer. We investigated the prevalence of anal high-grade intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) in RTRs compared with immunocompetent controls and risk factors for anal HSIL in RTRs. METHODS: We included 247 RTRs and 248 controls in this cross-sectional study. We obtained anal samples for HPV testing with INNO-LiPA and performed high-resolution anoscopy on all participants. The participants completed a questionnaire on lifestyle and sexual habits. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of histologically confirmed anal HSIL in RTRs vs controls and risk factors for anal HSIL in RTRs, stratified by sex and anal high-risk (hr) HPV status, adjusting for age, smoking, lifetime sexual partners, and receptive anal sex. RESULTS: RTRs had higher anal HSIL prevalence than controls, both among men (6.5% vs 0.8%; adjusted OR [aOR], 11.21 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.46-291.17]) and women (15.4% vs 4.0%; aOR, 6.41 [95% CI, 2.14-24.10]). Among those with anal hrHPV, RTRs had higher anal HSIL prevalence than controls (33.8% vs 9.5%; aOR, 6.06 [95% CI, 2.16-20.27]). Having had receptive anal sex (aOR, 6.23 [95% CI, 2.23-19.08]) or genital warts (aOR, 4.21 [95% CI, 1.53-11.48]) were risk factors for anal HSIL in RTRs. All HSIL cases occurred in individuals with anal hrHPV. CONCLUSIONS: RTRs had increased risk of anal HSIL compared with immunocompetent controls, with particularly high prevalence in female RTRs. Receptive anal sex, previous genital warts, and anal hrHPV infection were risk factors for anal HSIL in RTRs. Screening for anal HSIL in RTRs should be considered. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03018927.
