Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Br J Soc Psychol ; 62(1): 215-240, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35822522

ABSTRACT

A longitudinal field study tested the long-term effects (three years) of intergroup contact on both explicit and implicit outgroup attitudes. Participants were majority (Italian) and minority (immigrant) high-school students, who were tested at four waves from the beginning of their first year in high-school to the end of the third school year. Results revealed, first, a longitudinal association of quantity (but not quality) of contact with lower intergroup anxiety and more positive explicit attitudes, as well as bidirectional effects over time between explicit attitudes and intergroup anxiety, on the one hand, and quantity and quality of contact, on the other. Second, reduced intergroup anxiety mediated the association between quantity of contact and improved explicit attitudes over time. Third, the product of quantity and quality of contact longitudinally predicted more positive implicit outgroup attitudes over school years. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of findings.


Subject(s)
Minority Groups , Prejudice , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Attitude , Anxiety
2.
Sci Rep ; 7(1): 4633, 2017 07 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28680099

ABSTRACT

Learning disabilities that affect about 10% of human population are linked to atypical neurodevelopment, but predominantly treated by behavioural interventions. Behavioural interventions alone have shown little efficacy, indicating limited success in modulating neuroplasticity, especially in brains with neural atypicalities. Even in healthy adults, weeks of cognitive training alone led to inconsistent generalisable training gains, or "transfer effects" to non-trained materials. Meanwhile, transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), a painless and more direct neuromodulation method was shown to further promote cognitive training and transfer effects in healthy adults without harmful effects. It is unknown whether tRNS on the atypically developing brain might promote greater learning and transfer outcomes than training alone. Here, we show that tRNS over the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (dlPFCs) improved learning and performance of children with mathematical learning disabilities (MLD) during arithmetic training compared to those who received sham (placebo) tRNS. Training gains correlated positively with improvement on a standardized mathematical diagnostic test, and this effect was strengthened by tRNS. These findings mirror those in healthy adults, and encourage replications using larger cohorts. Overall, this study offers insights into the concept of combining tRNS and cognitive training for improving learning and cognition of children with learning disabilities.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Learning Disabilities/therapy , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Adult , Child , Cognition/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Mathematical Concepts , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Pilot Projects , Reaction Time
3.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn ; 42(9): 1458-72, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26913930

ABSTRACT

Recent studies have highlighted the potential role of basic numerical processing in the acquisition of numerical and mathematical competences. However, it is debated whether high-level numerical skills and mathematics depends specifically on basic numerical representations. In this study mathematicians and nonmathematicians performed a basic number line task, which required mapping positive and negative numbers on a physical horizontal line, and has been shown to correlate with more advanced numerical abilities and mathematical achievement. We found that mathematicians were more accurate compared with nonmathematicians when mapping positive, but not negative numbers, which are considered numerical primitives and cultural artifacts, respectively. Moreover, performance on positive number mapping could predict whether one is a mathematician or not, and was mediated by more advanced mathematical skills. This finding might suggest a link between basic and advanced mathematical skills. However, when we included visuospatial skills, as measured by block design subtest, the mediation analysis revealed that the relation between the performance in the number line task and the group membership was explained by non-numerical visuospatial skills. These results demonstrate that relation between basic, even specific, numerical skills and advanced mathematical achievement can be artifactual and explained by visuospatial processing. (PsycINFO Database Record


Subject(s)
Discrimination, Psychological/physiology , Mathematical Concepts , Space Perception/physiology , Visual Perception/physiology , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Photic Stimulation , Reaction Time/physiology , Young Adult
4.
PLoS One ; 11(1): e0146895, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26751203

ABSTRACT

Five studies tested whether intergroup contact reduces negative outgroup attitudes through a process of ingroup distancing. Based on the deprovincialization hypothesis and Social Dominance Theory, we hypothesized that the indirect effect of cross-group friendship on outgroup attitudes via reduced ingroup identification is moderated by individuals' Social Dominance Orientation (SDO), and occurs only for members of high status majority groups. We tested these predictions in three different intergroup contexts, involving conflictual relations between social groups in Germany (Study 1; N = 150; longitudinal Study 2: N = 753), Northern Ireland (Study 3: N = 160; Study 4: N = 1,948), and England (Study 5; N = 594). Cross-group friendship was associated with reduced ingroup identification and the link between reduced ingroup identification and improved outgroup attitudes was moderated by SDO (the indirect effect of cross-group friendship on outgroup attitudes via reduced ingroup only occurred for individuals scoring high, but not low, in SDO). Although there was a consistent moderating effect of SDO in high-status majority groups (Studies 1-5), but not low-status minority groups (Studies 3, 4, and 5), the interaction by SDO was not reliably stronger in high- than low-status groups. Findings are discussed in terms of better understanding deprovincialization effects of contact.


Subject(s)
Friends , Minority Groups , Social Dominance , Social Identification , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Attitude , England , Female , Germany , Group Processes , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Northern Ireland , Prejudice , Social Behavior , Students , Universities , Young Adult
5.
J Soc Psychol ; 154(3): 217-32, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24873025

ABSTRACT

There is a growing awareness that responses to mental health disorders differ according to the label. Still, research on contact and prejudice against people with mental health disorders has generally focused on the broader label, "mental illness," as though various disorders were interchangeable. The present research specifically investigated the relationship between intergroup contact and avoidance of people with schizophrenia--a particularly stigmatized and challenging group--as well as mediators of that relationship. In Study 1, 78 students completed measures of their prior contact with and prejudice against people with schizophrenia. Prior contact predicted less desired avoidance of people with schizophrenia, and this relationship was mediated by more favorable attitudes. Study 2 (N = 122) replicated the results of Study 1, and also found that less fear and less intergroup anxiety mediated the relationship between contact and avoidance. This suggests that contact may effectively reduce prejudice, even against this highly stigmatized group.


Subject(s)
Interpersonal Relations , Prejudice , Psychological Distance , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Schizophrenic Psychology , Social Identification , Adolescent , Anxiety/psychology , Attitude , Avoidance Learning , Defense Mechanisms , Fear , Female , Humans , Male , Social Stigma , Stereotyping , Students/psychology , Young Adult
6.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 111(11): 3996-4000, 2014 Mar 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24591627

ABSTRACT

We assessed evidence for a contextual effect of positive intergroup contact, whereby the effect of intergroup contact between social contexts (the between-level effect) on outgroup prejudice is greater than the effect of individual-level contact within contexts (the within-level effect). Across seven large-scale surveys (five cross-sectional and two longitudinal), using multilevel analyses, we found a reliable contextual effect. This effect was found in multiple countries, operationalizing context at multiple levels (regions, districts, and neighborhoods), and with and without controlling for a range of demographic and context variables. In four studies (three cross-sectional and one longitudinal) we showed that the association between context-level contact and prejudice was largely mediated by more tolerant norms. In social contexts where positive contact with outgroups was more commonplace, norms supported such positive interactions between members of different groups. Thus, positive contact reduces prejudice on a macrolevel, whereby people are influenced by the behavior of others in their social context, not merely on a microscale, via individuals' direct experience of positive contact with outgroup members. These findings reinforce the view that contact has a significant role to play in prejudice reduction, and has great policy potential as a means to improve intergroup relations, because it can simultaneously impact large numbers of people.


Subject(s)
Interpersonal Relations , Models, Psychological , Prejudice/psychology , Social Behavior , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...