ABSTRACT
Social theories of risk suggest that a combination of scientific and cultural perspectives converge to influence risk perception. This article first surveys sociological perspectives suggesting that risks from modern technological development have become predominant concerns in the social consciousness. Particular attention is given to those theses describing how social elements work to create perception of risks in relation to new technologies. The themes that emerge from this survey are then related to contemporary debates concerning biotechnology. Specific attention is given to recent controversies regarding genetically modified crops, and parallels are drawn between debates over nuclear power and biotechnology. A procedural ethic for public discourse and decision making over the diffusion of genetically modified foods is offered. Ethical and social theories are linked with the hope that by recognizing the social dimensions of debates over new technologies a broader framework for conducting risk analysis may emerge.
Subject(s)
Biotechnology , Culture , Risk , Animals , Butterflies , Communication , Democracy , Genetic Engineering , Humans , Nuclear Reactors , Plants, Edible/genetics , Social EnvironmentABSTRACT
This review was conducted to characterize the nature of contemporary occupational epidemiologic research involving genetic markers, consider how genetic information is unique with regard to its social applications, and examine some of the ethical dilemmas that may arise over the course of studies. We have reviewed the literature and the lessons from our experience in conducting occupational epidemiologic research involving genetic markers. This review describes how occupational epidemiologic studies differ from other epidemiologic studies on issues of participation, confidentiality, and the history of including genetic markers. Of primary concern in occupational studies are genes that have multiple alleles and are sometimes referred to as "metabolic polymorphisms." They generally do not confer risk on their own but rather only in combination with a specific exposure. There is a need for a clear policy and guidelines for the conduct of occupational epidemiologic studies using genetic material. This policy should address all of the steps in study design, implementation, interpretation, and communication of results.
Subject(s)
Epidemiologic Studies , Ethics, Medical , Ethics, Research , Genetic Markers , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Genetic Research/ethics , Occupational Diseases/genetics , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Genetic Privacy , Humans , Informed Consent , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
Genetic screening can identify individuals with increased susceptibility to certain workplace toxicants. One conceivable benefit is a reduction in occupational disease costs. We examine this rationale by considering the associations among genetic traits, exposure, disease risk, and disease incidence. Given appropriate information, we describe methods for computing the expectation and variance of the future number of disease cases and of the differential screening cost per worker hired (a cost-benefit measure). We present two hypothetical scenarios: (1) benzene-induced cancer with few expected cases, and (2) chronic beryllium disease with many expected cases. We show that variability in disease incidence and cost outcomes must be considered because in specific instances, screening can be cost-beneficial on average but yield an unfavorable outcome with high probability. This circumstance pertains to scenarios involving small differences between the expected number of cases in screened versus unscreened cohorts.
