ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In patients with conventional pacemakers or ICD's, MRI is infrequently performed due to safety concerns. Recent reports have allayed many of these concerns. However, the additive clinical value of scanning patients with cardiac implants has not been established. OBJECTIVE: Assessing the additive value of thoracic and non-thoracic MRI in patients with implantable cardiac devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective data were analyzed in 500 patients with implanted cardiac devices that underwent MRI over a 12 year period at a single institution (Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA). A set of three questions were answered following scan interpretation by both the MRI technologist and interpreting MRI physician(s): 1) Did the primary diagnosis change? 2) Did MRI provide additional information to the existing diagnosis? 3) Did patient management change? If 'Yes' was answered to any of the above questions, it was considered that the MRI scan was of value to patient diagnosis and/or guiding therapy. Scans encountered were neurological/neurosurgical 354 (70.8%), cardiac 98 (19.6%) and orthopedic 48 (9.6%) in nature. In 431 (86%) MRI added additional information to the primary diagnosis and in 277 (55.4%) MRI changed the primary diagnosis. In 304 (60.8%) cases management changed, 265 (53%) due to a change in diagnosis and in 39 (7.8%) due to providing additional information. No safety issues were encountered and no adverse effects of MRI scan were noted. CONCLUSIONS: MRI in patients with implanted cardiac devices was of additive value to diagnosis and management thereby informing risk-benefit considerations. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: 500 patients with implanted cardiac devices who underwent a MRI examination over a 12 year period were followed prospectively. Imaging primarily focus on three anatomical regions (neurological/neurosurgical, cardiac and orthopedic) providing added information to the primary diagnosis in 431 (86%) cases and changing the primary diagnosis in 277 (55.4%) cases. In 304 (60.8%) cases management changed with 265 (53%) being due to a change of diagnosis and in 39 (7.8%) due to providing additional information. No safety issues were encountered using a defined protocol. CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging retains its diagnostic yield in patients with implanted devices.
Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable , Pacemaker, Artificial , Heart , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
To establish the clinical validity and accuracy of automatic thresholding and manual trimming (ATMT) by comparing the method with the conventional contouring method for in vivo cardiac volume measurements. CMR was performed on 40 subjects (30 patients and 10 controls) using steady-state free precession cine sequences with slices oriented in the short-axis and acquired contiguously from base to apex. Left ventricular (LV) volumes, end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and stroke volume (SV) were obtained with ATMT and with the conventional contouring method. Additionally, SV was measured independently using CMR phase velocity mapping (PVM) of the aorta for validation. Three methods of calculating SV were compared by applying Bland-Altman analysis. The Bland-Altman standard deviation of variation (SD) and offset bias for LV SV for the three sets of data were: ATMT-PVM (7.65, [Formula: see text]), ATMT-contours (7.85, [Formula: see text]), and contour-PVM (11.01, 4.97), respectively. Equating the observed range to the error contribution of each approach, the error magnitude of ATMT:PVM:contours was in the ratio 1:2.4:2.5. Use of ATMT for measuring ventricular volumes accommodates trabeculae and papillary structures more intuitively than contemporary contouring methods. This results in lower variation when analyzing cardiac structure and function and consequently improved accuracy in assessing chamber volumes.
ABSTRACT
Left atrial appendage mass can occasionally pose a serious challenge to physicians to identify the nature of the mass with the aid of imaging techniques. We present a case of 67-year-old man, who was evaluated for suspected left atria myxoma. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed a heterogeneous density originating from left atrial appendage, thought to be most consistent with a myxoma. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, uncharacteristically, gave an equivocal picture, suggesting the mass to be a myxoma on initial imaging and a thrombus with evidence of liquefaction necrosis following postcontrast enhancement. Surprisingly, histopathology of the mass following its surgical excision yielded a rare diagnosis of myxofibrosarcoma.
