Is source elevation an auditory distance cue? A preliminary study.

The aim of this work was to evaluate whether the angular elevation of a sound source could generate auditory cues which improve the auditory distance perception in a similar way to that previously reported by visual modality. For this purpose, we compared ADP curves obtained with sources located both at the listeners' ears and at ground level. Our hypothesis was that the participants can interpret the relation between elevation and distance of ground-level sources (which are linked geometrically) so we expected them to perceive their distances more accurately than those at ear level. However, the responses obtained with sources located at ground level were almost identical to those obtained at the height of the listeners' ears, showing that, under the conditions of our experiment, auditory elevation cues do not influence auditory distance perception.

Auditory distance perception by blind and sighted participants for both within- and beyond-reach sources.

This study aimed to test the hypothesis that associates blindness with a reduced ability to judge the absolute distance from sound sources. Our working hypotheses were the following: (a) Within reach, a blind subject will be able to make up for the lack of vision using proprioceptive information to calibrate the acoustic distance perception cues. (b) As the source becomes unreachable, blind people will show greater biases since, out of reach, the proposed mechanism for calibration could not be used. To approach these topics, we carried out a series of auditory distance experiments in which we asked sighted and blind participants to report their distance estimates verbally or by reaching the sound source. Within-reach results showed that blind participants performed better than (reaching) or similar to (verbal report) the sighted. The verbal report results showed similar biases between both groups. However, blind participants had more compressive responses than the sighted. Furthermore, blind participants showed more biased responses in the far field than in the peripersonal space, while sighted participants showed similar biases regardless of distance. Our results strongly suggest that the blind can calibrate their distance estimations through the use of proprioceptive spatial information. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).