Treatment Tolerance of Cetuximab versus Alternative Chemotherapy Agents in Non-Cisplatin Candidates with Head and Neck Cancer Receiving Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Standard of care for radiosensitization in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with high-dose cisplatin. The optimal chemoradiation regimen for patients medically unfit for cisplatin is unclear. We compared our experience with concurrent cetuximab (CTX) versus other cytotoxic non-cisplatin agents. METHODS: We reviewed 53 patients between 2011 and 2017 with HNSCC treated with CCRT ineligible for cisplatin. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment tolerance was evaluated in those receiving CTX versus non-CTX chemotherapy (NCC). Of the NCC regimens, the majority were carboplatin/paclitaxel and were dosed at an area under the curve (AUC) of 2 and 45-50 mg/m2, respectively. Standard radiation dosing was 70 Gray (Gy) in the definitive setting and 60-66 Gy in the postoperative setting. Patient characteristics and treatment toxicities were evaluated using categorical methods. RESULTS: Patients were well balanced overall including differences between performance status and the comorbidity score. NCC patients experienced more radiation treatment breaks (52.4% vs. 21.9%, p = 0.022), radiation delays >1 week (33.3% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.01), and chemotherapy dose-limiting toxicity (61.9% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.015) compared to CTX patients. Nutritional dependence on a PEG tube was more likely in the NCC cohort (52.4% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest decreased treatment tolerance in non-cisplatin cytotoxic chemotherapy compared to cetuximab. Further prospective study is needed to clarify optimal chemotherapy in patients unable to receive cisplatin.

Prognostic Implications of Skin Invasion in Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of histopathologic skin invasion on 2- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with primary surgery for locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study was performed comparing previously untreated patients with pT4a OCSCC with and without skin invasion. SETTING: Academic medical center. METHODS: Propensity score-matched cohorts were derived by age, sex, surgical margins, pathologic N classification, adjuvant treatment, and primary tumor site. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate 2- and 5-year OS and DFS, which were compared between cohorts via the log rank (Mantel-Cox) test statistic. RESULTS: Overall 25 patients were identified to have pathologic skin invasion, and 50 were selected for the matched control group. OS was significantly lower for patients with skin invasion as compared with controls at 2 years (30.8% vs 53.3%, P = .018) and 5 years (16.6% vs 42.2%, P = .01). DFS was significantly lower for patients with skin invasion vs controls at 2 years (23.7% vs 47.7, P = .037) and 5 years (15.8% vs 41.4%, P = .024). CONCLUSION: Histopathologic skin invasion in OCSCC is associated with dismal prognosis in patients who underwent primary surgical treatment. OS outcomes for patients with skin invasion are comparable to survival of patients with recurrent/metastatic disease and T4N2 disease.

Sarcopenia and Treatment Toxicity in Older Adults Undergoing Chemoradiation for Head and Neck Cancer: Identifying Factors to Predict Frailty.

This study was performed to identify treatment related toxicities in older adults undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer and nutritional and skeletal muscle measures that might identify frailty. Imaging analysis was done with the following skeletal muscle measurements: skeletal muscle index (SMI), skeletal muscle density (SMD), and skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). Patients were dichotomized by age into younger (<70 years old, 221 patients) and older age groups (≥70 years old, 51 patients). Low SMI was more common in older patients (86.7%) compared to younger patients (51.7%, p < 0.01), as were low SMD (57.8% vs. 37.3%, p = 0.012) and low SMG (76.1% vs. 44.2%, p < 0.01), despite having similar BMIs (27.3 kg/m2 versus 27.7 kg/m2, p = 0.71). Older patients were significantly more likely to experience chemotherapy toxicity than younger patients (54.9% versus 32.3%, p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis age (p < 0.01), current smoking status (p < 0.01), and low SMI (p < 0.01) remained as significant predictors for missed chemotherapy cycles or discontinuation. Older patients were more likely to require ≥5-day radiation breaks than younger patients (27.5% versus 8.6%, p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, age (p < 0.01), low albumin status (p = 0.03), and low SMI (p = 0.04) were identified as predictors of prolonged radiation treatment breaks. Based on the results of our study, sarcopenia may be used as an additional marker for frailty alongside traditional performance status scales.

Mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase-2 (MK2) and its role in cell survival, inflammatory signaling, and migration in promoting cancer.

Cancer and the immune system share an intimate relationship. Chronic inflammation increases the risk of cancer occurrence and can also drive inflammatory mediators into the tumor microenvironment enhancing tumor growth and survival. The p38 MAPK pathway is activated both acutely and chronically by stress, inflammatory chemokines, chronic inflammatory conditions, and cancer. These properties have led to extensive efforts to find effective drugs targeting p38, which have been unsuccessful. The immediate downstream serine/threonine kinase and substrate of p38 MAPK, mitogen-activated-protein-kinase-activated-protein-kinase-2 (MK2) protects cells against stressors by regulating the DNA damage response, transcription, protein and messenger RNA stability, and motility. The phosphorylation of downstream substrates by MK2 increases inflammatory cytokine production, drives an immune response, and contributes to wound healing. By binding directly to p38 MAPK, MK2 is responsible for the export of p38 MAPK from the nucleus which gives MK2 properties that make it unique among the large number of p38 MAPK substrates. Many of the substrates of both p38 MAPK and MK2 are separated between the cytosol and nucleus and interfering with MK2 and altering this intracellular translocation has implications for the actions of both p38 MAPK and MK2. The inhibition of MK2 has shown promise in combination with both chemotherapy and radiotherapy as a method for controlling cancer growth and metastasis in a variety of cancers. Whereas the current data are encouraging the field requires the development of selective and well tolerated drugs to target MK2 and a better understanding of its effects for effective clinical use.

What is the hold up?-Mixed-methods analysis of postoperative radiotherapy delay in head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Delays in postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) increase the risk for recurrence and mortality. The multifactorial nature of delays calls for an in-depth understanding of potential contributors from the patient's and provider's perspectives. We sought to identify causes of delays in adjuvant radiotherapy initiation for HNC. METHODS: We performed a mixed-methods study including patients with HNC care team members. Forty in-depth interviews were performed (26 patients; 14 care team members). Timing and demographic data were collected from medical records. RESULTS: Median time from surgery to radiotherapy initiation was 45 days; 15 participants began after 42 days. Process delays and failure to communicate the urgency and significance of PORT initiation contributes to delays. Patients with a strong social support system experience less delays. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving reductions in PORT initiation requires efficient care coordination, improved communication between interdisciplinary teams, and strengthening social support systems for patients with HNC.

The impact of sarcopenia on tolerance of radiation and outcome in patients with head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Sarcopenia is a predictor of poor prognosis in cancer patients. One potential mechanism for worse outcomes in sarcopenic patients is worse tolerance to treatment; this has not been investigated with regard to radiation treatment. We reviewed our institutional experience of head and neck cancer patients receiving concurrent chemoradiation and assessed outcomes with respect to sarcopenia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated between 2012 and 2016 were reviewed. Sarcopenia was assessed from radiation planning computed tomography (CT) scans using muscles at the C3 vertebral body using previously published methods. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Association between patient factors and outcome was calculated in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-six patients were included. Fifty-eight percent met criteria for sarcopenia. Thirty-seven percent experienced chemotherapy delays of >1 week and 14% had radiation treatment breaks >1 week. On multivariate analysis, concurrent smoking (HR 3.85, p < 0.01) and sarcopenia (HR 2.15, p = 0.01) were associated with chemotherapy toxicity and age >65 years (HR 2.94, p < 0.01) and sarcopenia (HR 2.99, p = 0.04) were associated with prolonged radiation breaks. Sarcopenia was associated with worse overall survival (HR 1.83, p = 0.03) and progression-free survival (HR 1.65, p = 0.03) in the overall cohort. When analyzed separately, sarcopenia was not associated with outcomes in p16-positive oropharynx cancers. CONCLUSION: Sarcopenic patients receiving concurrent chemoradiation are more likely to require radiation treatment breaks and suffer chemotherapy toxicity than their non-sarcopenic counterparts. This may contribute to worse survival outcomes in head and neck cancer, with the exception of p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer.

Weekly cisplatin chemotherapy dosing versus triweekly chemotherapy with concurrent radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Triweekly high-dose cisplatin (100 mg/m2 ) with concurrent radiation therapy is the current standard of care in the definitive or appropriate postoperative setting in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We compared triweekly 100 mg/m2 with alternative weekly 40 mg/m2 and weekly <40 mg/m2 cisplatin regimens. METHODS: From 2011 to 2016, 163 patients received concurrent cisplatin and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced HNSCC. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. RESULTS: Cisplatin weekly <40 mg/m2 showed inferior OS outcomes when compared to weekly 40 mg/m2 (P = 0.084) and triweekly 100 mg/m2 (P = 0.04) regimens. CONCLUSION: Our study displayed inferior outcomes with weekly cisplatin doses under 40 mg/m2 , suggesting the inferiority of low-dose weekly chemotherapy and the need for ongoing randomized trials to further explore 40 vs 100 mg/m2 chemotherapy regimens.

Safety and efficacy of hypofractionated stereotactic body reirradiation in head and neck cancer: Long-term follow-up of a large series.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report long-term outcomes for a large cohort of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) reirradiation. METHODS: From 2002 to 2011, 85 patients with previously irradiated HNSCC were treated with SBRT to 94 lesions. Some underwent surgery (29%), and many were treated with induction, concurrent, and/or adjuvant chemotherapy or biologic therapy (70%). RESULTS: Reirradiation occurred at a median interval from initial radiotherapy (RT) of 32 months. Median follow-up for survivors was 17.3 months. Two-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS) and locoregional control for patients and lesions treated with curative intent were 24% and 28%, respectively. Interval from initial RT to SBRT of 2 years or more was associated with improved OS (p = .019). Five patients had grade 3 or higher late toxicity (5.9%). CONCLUSION: SBRT reirradiation results in limited toxicity. Further research is needed to refine optimal roles for SBRT and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) reirradiation.

Risk factors for posttreatment edema in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for meningiomas.

BACKGROUND: Peritumoral edema is a recognized complication following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of posttreatment peritumoral edema following SRS for intracranial meningiomas and determine predictive factors. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2008, 173 evaluable patients underwent CyberKnife or Gamma Knife SRS for meningiomas. Eighty-four patients (49%) had prior surgical resections, 13 patients had World Health Organization grade II (atypical) meningiomas, and 117 patients had a neurological deficit before SRS. Sixty-two tumors were in parasagittal, parafalcine, and convexity locations. The median tumor volume was 4.7 mL (range, 0.1-231.8 mL). The median prescribed dose and median prescribed biologically equivalent dose were 15 Gy (range, 9-40 Gy) and 67 Gy (range, 14-116 Gy), respectively. Ninety-seven patients were treated with single-fraction SRS, 74 received 2 to 5 fractions, and 2 received >5 fractions. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 21.0 months. Thirteen patients (8%) developed symptomatic peritumoral edema, with a median onset time of 4.5 months (range, 0.2-9.5 months). The 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month actuarial symptomatic edema rates were 2.9%, 4.9%, 7.7%, and 8.5%, respectively. The crude tumor control rate was 94%. On univariate analysis, large tumor volume (P = .01) and single-fraction SRS (P = .04) were predictive for development of posttreatment edema. CONCLUSION: SRS meningioma treatment demonstrated a low incidence of toxicity; however, large tumor volumes and single-fraction SRS treatment had an increased risk for posttreatment edema. Risk factors for edema should be considered in meningiomas treatment.

Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for reirradiation of head-and-neck cancer.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an appealing treatment option after previous radiotherapy because of its precision, conformality, and reduced treatment duration. We report our experience with reirradiation using fractionated SRS for head-and-neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2002 to 2008, 65 patients received SRS to the oropharynx (n = 13), hypopharynx (n = 8), nasopharynx (n = 7), paranasal sinus (n = 7), neck (n = 7), and other sites (n = 23). Thirty-eight patients were treated definitively and 27 patients with metastatic disease and/or untreated local disease were treated palliatively. Nine patients underwent complete macroscopic resection before SRS. Thirty-three patients received concurrent chemoradiation. The median initial radiation dose was 67 Gy, and the median reirradiation SRS dose was 30 Gy (21-35 Gy) in 2-5 fractions. RESULTS: Median follow-up for surviving patients was 16 months. Fifty-six patients were evaluable for response: 30 (54%) had complete, 15 (27%) had partial, and 11 (20%) had no response. Median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 12 months. For definitively treated patients, the 2-year OS and locoregional control (LRC) rates were 41% and 30%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher total dose, surgical resection, and nasopharynx site were significantly associated with improved LRC; surgical resection and nonsquamous histology were associated with improved OS. Seven patients (11%) experienced severe reirradiation-related toxicity, including one treatment-attributed death. CONCLUSION: SRS reirradiation for head-and-neck cancer is feasible. This study demonstrates encouraging response rates with acceptable toxicity. Fractionated SRS reirradiation with concurrent chemotherapy in select patients warrants further study.