Subject(s)
Ultraviolet Therapy , Vitiligo , Humans , Vitiligo/radiotherapy , Treatment Outcome , Combined Modality Therapy , PhototherapyABSTRACT
Introduction: Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma patients can cause immune-related adverse effects, such as vitiligo. In vitiligo, specific autoimmunity against melanocytes results in depigmentation of the skin. Melanoma-associated vitiligo occurring in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors can be seen as a good prognostic sign as higher survival rates in melanoma-associated vitiligo cases have been reported.Areas covered: This review gives an insight into the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management of melanoma-associated vitiligo caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors.Expert opinion: Development of melanoma-associated vitiligo induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors could be a good clinical marker for response and overall survival. Induction of vitiligo in these patients could also potentially lead to better response and survival rates. Further research should focus on several aspects of melanoma-associated vitiligo, such as better screening and registration, more understanding of pathophysiology of the type of immune response and the predictive value of melanoma-associated in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Subject(s)
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Vitiligo/chemically induced , Vitiligo/drug therapy , Animals , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Melanoma/drug therapy , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Vitiligo/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Currently, vitiligo lacks a validated Physician Global Assessment (PGA) for disease extent. This PGA can be used to stratify and interpret the numeric scores obtained by the Vitiligo Extent Score (VES). We investigated the interrater reliability of a 5-point PGA scale during an international vitiligo workshop. Vitiligo experts from five different continents rated photographs of non-segmental vitiligo patients with varying degrees of extent with the PGA score. Good interrater agreements (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.6) were observed between the raters overall and within each continent. All hypotheses to evaluate construct validity were confirmed. Median VES values per category were for limited 1.10 [IQR: 0.21-1.67], moderate 3.17 [IQR: 1.75-6.21], extensive 9.58 [IQR: 6.21-13.03] and very extensive 42.67 [IQR: 21.20-42.67]. Defined categories for vitiligo extent can be valuable for inclusion criteria and may impact future reimbursement criteria.
Subject(s)
Dermatologists/standards , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards , Global Health , Risk Assessment/standards , Severity of Illness Index , Vitiligo/diagnosis , Humans , Internationality , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of ResultsSubject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Severity of Illness Index , Ultraviolet Therapy , Vitiligo/drug therapy , Vitiligo/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Body Surface Area , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Skin Pigmentation , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultSubject(s)
Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Severity of Illness Index , Ultraviolet Therapy/methods , Vitiligo/diagnosis , Administration, Cutaneous , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Skin Pigmentation/physiology , Treatment Outcome , Vitiligo/drug therapy , Vitiligo/radiotherapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Vitiligo Extent Score (VES) has recently been introduced as a physicians' score for the clinical assessment of the extent of vitiligo, but a good patient self-assessment score is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to develop and validate a simplified version of the VES as a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). METHODS: After extensive pilot testing, patients were asked to score their vitiligo extent twice with an interval of 2 weeks using the Self Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA-VES). The scores were compared with the physicians' evaluation (VES). RESULTS: The SA-VES demonstrated very good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation = 0.948, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.911-0.970) that was not affected by age, skin type, or vitiligo distribution pattern. According to patients, this evaluation method was easy to use (22% very easy; 49% easy; 29% normal) and required <5 minutes in the majority of patients (73%, <5 minutes; 24%, 5-10 minutes; 2%, 10-15 minutes). Comparison of the SA-VES and the VES demonstrated excellent correlation (r = 0.986, P <.001). LIMITATIONS: Few patients had a dark skin type. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate excellent reliability of the SA-VES and excellent correlation with its investigator-reported counterpart (VES). This patient-oriented evaluation method provides a useful tool for the assessment of vitiligo extent.
Subject(s)
Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Severity of Illness Index , Vitiligo/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Body Surface Area , Child , Diagnostic Self Evaluation , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Reproducibility of Results , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Melanoma-associated leukoderma (MAL) is a depigmenting disorder that can occur spontaneously in patients with melanoma. The differences in clinical presentation between MAL and vitiligo are not well defined. This may lead to misdiagnosing MAL as vitiligo, resulting in delayed detection of melanoma. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess whether experts in the field can distinguish between MAL and vitiligo, and to assess if discriminative features can be identified. METHODS: We designed an image comparison study in which 4 experts in the field blindly assessed photographs followed by medical history of 11 patients with MAL and 33 with vitiligo. RESULTS: The assessors misdiagnosed 72.7% of MAL cases and marked 80.0% of them as typical vitiligo. The median age at onset of the leukoderma was higher (55 years, P = .001) in MAL. No discriminative features were found. LIMITATIONS: Sampling bias because of inclusion in tertiary referral center is a limitation. CONCLUSION: The clinical presentation of leukoderma in patients with melanoma resembles that of vitiligo. We propose "melanoma-associated vitiligo" as the more appropriate term for leukoderma in patients with melanoma. Clinicians should be aware that depigmentation in vitiligo can also be caused by melanoma-associated vitiligo and a total body inspection should be performed.
