An acetylcholinesterase-inspired biomimetic toxicity sensor.

This work demonstrates the ability of an acetylcholinesterase-inspired biomimetic sensor to accurately predict the toxicity of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors. In surface waters used for municipal drinking water supplies, numerous pesticides and other anthropogenic chemicals have been found that inhibit AChE; however, there is currently no portable toxicity assay capable of determining the potential neurotoxicity of water samples and complex mixtures. Biological assays have been developed to determine the toxicity of unknown samples, but the short shelf-life of cells and other biological materials often make them undesirable for use in portable assays. Chemical methods and structure-activity-relationships, on the other hand, require prior knowledge on the compounds of interest that is often unavailable when analyzing environmental samples. In the toxicity assay presented here, the acetylcholinesterase enzyme has been replaced with 1-phenyl-1,2,3-butanetrione 2-oxime (PBO) a biomimetic compound that is structurally similar to the AChE active site. Using a biomimetic compound in place of the native enzyme allows for a longer shelf-life while maintaining the selective and kinetic ability of the enzyme itself. Previous work has shown the success of oxime-based sensors in the selective detection of AChE inhibitors and this work highlights the ability of an AChE-inspired biomimetic sensor to accurately predict the toxicity (LD50 and LC50) for a range of AChE inhibitors. The biomimetic assay shows strong linear correlations to LD50 (oral, rat) and LC50 (fish) values. Using a test set of eight AChE inhibitors, the biomimetic assay accurately predicted the LC50 value for 75% of the inhibitors within one order of magnitude.

Non-biological inhibition-based sensing (NIBS) demonstrated for the detection of toxic arsenic compounds.

This work demonstrates the success of a recently developed technique in chemical amplification, non-biological inhibition-based sensing (NIBS), for the detection of toxic arsenic compounds. Screening for toxic arsenic compounds is especially important due to their prevalence in wastewater and water sources. The detection method presented in this work amplifies the chemical response of toxic arsenic compounds by developing a sensor chemistry where the analyte inhibits, rather than enhances, the rate of a catalytic reaction. This technique mimics the work done with enzyme inhibition; however, using non-biological molecules allows for selective detection without the shelf-life issue associated with biological molecules. Using NIBS we find that we can enhance the sensitivity of the system by two orders of magnitude with no apparent loss in selectivity. This work demonstrates the versatility of NIBS, showing that the technique can be of general use for the detection of toxic compounds.

Nonbiological inhibition-based sensing (NIBS) demonstrated for the detection of toxic sulfides.

The purpose of this paper is to report on a new technique in chemical detection: nonbiological inhibition-based sensing (NIBS). This method uses a new approach to chemical amplification, where the analyte inhibits rather than enhances the rate of catalytic reaction. Although there are many possible catalysts for this technique, such as enzymes, this paper focuses on using the selective binding found in colorimetric detection. Colorimetric methods are selective; however, they are not particularly sensitive. Using nonbiological-based molecules allows for selective detection without the shelf-life issues that are associated with enzymes. In practice, we can use the active substances in Draeger tubes and related systems as catalysts. Analytes of interest inhibit the catalysts that leads to a large signal. The work presented here focuses on the detection of toxic sulfide compounds. Using NIBS, we observe that we can enhance the sensitivity of the system by 2 orders of magnitude with no apparent loss in selectivity. We can also decrease the detection time from 5 h to 10 min. So far, we have demonstrated the technique for sulfide detection; however, we believe that the technique can have general use in the detection of toxic compounds.