Engaging and retaining women in outpatient alcohol and other drug treatment: the effect of referral intensity.

Women with alcohol or other drug (AOD) problems experience a range of barriers to inpatient treatment. Although research in the general population shows that high-intensity referrals are more effective than low-intensity referrals at engaging and retaining individuals in outpatient AOD treatment, the impact of referral intensity has not been assessed for women only. To examine this issue, a secondary analysis was conducted using an existing data set that included a sample of 109 women. Although intensity of referral was not related to entry into or relapse during treatment, high-intensity referral was associated with completion of treatment. In addition, women who relapsed during treatment were less likely to complete it, underscoring the need for relapse prevention training.

The Johnson Intervention and relapse during outpatient treatment.

The Johnson Intervention is a therapeutic technique in which members of a person's social network confront him or her about the damage that drinking and drug use has caused and the action they will take if he or she does not enter treatment. Previously, we evaluated the effectiveness of the Johnson Intervention at engaging and retaining clients in outpatient alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment by comparing it to four other methods of referral. Although individuals who undergo a Johnson Intervention are most likely to enter treatment, the power of the Johnson Intervention to retain clients deteriorates over the course of treatment, as indicated by their diminished likelihood of completing. Given that abstinence from alcohol and other drugs is one of the first expectations placed on clients, we compared the Johnson Intervention to the other types of referral to evaluate the role of relapse during treatment. In a secondary analysis of 210 cases, we found relapse rates across the five types of referral ranged from 38% to 79%. Those in the Johnson Intervention group were more likely to relapse than three of the four other groups and, across all groups, those who relapsed were less likely to complete treatment. In spite of its high relapse rate, the Johnson Intervention is very effective in retaining those who relapse because it is very effective retaining all clients, whether they relapse or not.

A comparison of the Johnson Intervention with four other methods of referral to outpatient treatment.

The Johnson Intervention is a therapeutic technique in which members of the person's social network confront him or her about the damage the drinking or drug use has caused and the action they will take if treatment is refused. It is highly effective in engaging and retaining clients in inpatient treatment, but, since initial evaluations, two trends have emerged in the field. First, there has been an increase in the use of outpatient treatment and, second, a number of variations of the Johnson Intervention have been developed. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Johnson Intervention with four other methods of referral to outpatient treatment. The other methods included two naturally occurring types of referral (coerced and non-coerced) and two less intense and less costly variations of the Intervention (Unrehearsed and Unsupervised). Effectiveness was determined by both entry into and completion of treatment. A retrospective study was conducted on a sample of 331 cases drawn from an alcohol and other drug treatment agency. Those who had undergone the Johnson Intervention were more likely to enter treatment than those in any of the four other groups. Of those that entered treatment, the Johnson Intervention and the coerced referral groups were equally likely to complete treatment, and both groups were more likely to complete treatment than those in the other three types of referral. Although the Johnson Intervention was the most effective, the variations did show some measure of success and can be viewed as part of an Intervention continuum.