ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infection (IFI) is one of the most challenging complications in children undergoing acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) treatment, but acute fungal osteomyelitis (OM) is rarely encountered. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we describe a case of Candida tropicalis osteomyelitis in a 10-year-old patient with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive ALL. He was on remission induction therapy at the time of neutropenia, and an abscess developed in his right arm. The blood and bone cultures were positive for C. tropicalis. Antibiotics and antifungals were administered. Magnetic resonance imaging of the arm revealed an intraosseous abscess, suggestive of OM. Surgical irrigation and debridement of the bone were performed immediately. The patient was effectively treated with antifungal therapy and ALL treatment. He has fully recovered into complete clinical remission but with visible sequelae on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). He took oral posaconazole for consolidation until disappearance of the lesion shadows on MRI and received subsequent cycles of chemotherapy in parallel. CONCLUSIONS: In the successful management of Ph-positive ALL, dasatinib, a second-generation Abl-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is crucial. The recommended treatment for Candida osteomyelitis in Ph-positive ALL patients is a fungicidal agent combined with surgery and modification chemotherapy with dasatinib. The use of combined modalities of treatment seems to be crucial in the successful management of Ph-positive ALL.
Subject(s)
Candidiasis/immunology , Candidiasis/microbiology , Dasatinib/therapeutic use , Osteomyelitis/immunology , Osteomyelitis/microbiology , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/complications , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Candida tropicalis , Candidiasis/therapy , Child , Combined Modality Therapy , Debridement , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Osteomyelitis/therapy , Philadelphia Chromosome , Remission Induction , Therapeutic IrrigationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine whether a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) combined with embolotherapy was superior to TIPS alone. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients were included in the study (43 in the TIPS and embolotherapy group and 36 in the TIPS alone group). Embolotherapy was performed after TIPS using coils and a tissue adhesive agent. The portosystemic pressure gradient (PPG) after TIPS was lower than 12 mm Hg in all patients. Multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox regression model, and the probabilities of survival and rebleeding were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Baseline patient survey data showed similar distributions in both groups. The mean follow-up time was 45.6 months (range: 1 to 85.6 mo). There were no significant differences in the incidences of rebleeding (P=0.889), stent revision (P=0.728), encephalopathy (P=0.728), the cumulative survival rate (P=0.552), or the probability of being free of rebleeding (P=0.806) between the 2 groups. Of 9 patients with rebleeding after TIPS plus embolotherapy, 7 had a history of esophageal variceal bleeding and 2 had gastric variceal bleeding. Of 8 patients with rebleeding after TIPS alone, 4 had a history of esophageal variceal bleeding and 4 had gastric variceal bleeding (P=0.247). Multivariate analysis showed that PPG after TIPS was an independent predictor of rebleeding (P=0.036). Age and Model of End-stage Liver Disease score were independent predictors of survival (P=0.048 and 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that TIPS with embolotherapy cannot reduce the risk of rebleeding if PPG is less than 12 mm Hg after TIPS. PPG after TIPS is an independent predictor of rebleeding.
Subject(s)
Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Liver Cirrhosis/surgery , Liver Cirrhosis/therapy , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic/methods , Adult , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/complications , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/surgery , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/therapy , Female , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/complications , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/surgery , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/therapy , Humans , Hypertension, Portal/surgery , Hypertension, Portal/therapy , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is technically divided into TIPS through the left branch of the portal vein (TIPS-LBPV) and TIPS through the right branch of the portal vein (TIPS-RBPV). In order to compare their advantages and disadvantages, this randomized, controlled trial was designed to investigate their outcomes in advanced cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Seventy-two patients were randomly placed into TIPS-LBPV (36 patients) and TIPS-RBPV (36 patients, with four failures) groups, and they were prospectively followed for 2 years after TIPS implantation. RESULTS: Patients who underwent the two different kinds of TIPS were balanced during recruitment for this study. The incidences of overall encephalopathy and de novo encephalopathy in the TIPS-LBPV group were significantly lower than that of the TIPS-RBPV group during follow-up (P=0.036 and 0.012 respectively). The incidences of rebleeding or re-intervention and improvement of ascites were similar between groups (P>0.05). Patients undergoing TIPS-RBPV required more rehospitalization and incurred more costs than those who underwent TIPS-LBPV (P=0.030 and 0.039 respectively). There was no significant difference between the two groups in survival based on a survival curve constructed according to the Kaplan-Meier method (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing TIPS-LBPV had a lower incidence of encephalopathy, less rehospitalization and lower costs after TIPS implantation compared with patients undergoing TIPS-RBPV.
