ABSTRACT
5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) chemoresistance is a persistent impediment to the efficient treatment of many types of cancer, yet the molecular mechanisms underlying such resistance remain incompletely understood. Here we found CRC patients resistant to 5-FU treatment exhibited increased extracellular matrix protein 1 (ECM1) expression compared to CRC patients sensitive to this chemotherapeutic agent, and higher levels of ECM1 expression were correlated significantly with shorter overall survival and disease-free survival. 5-FU resistant HCT15 (HCT15/FU) cells expressed significantly higher levels of ECM1 relative to parental HCT15 cells. Changes in ECM1 expression altered the ability of both parental and HCT15/FU cells to tolerate the medication in vitro and in vivo via processes associated with apoptosis and EMT induction. From a mechanistic perspective, knocking down and overexpressing ECM1 in HCT15/FU and HCT15 cell lines inhibited and activated PI3K/AKT/GSK3ß signaling, respectively. Accordingly, 5-FU-induced apoptotic activity and EMT phenotype changes were affected by treatment with PI3K/AKT agonists and inhibitors. Together, these data support a model wherein ECM1 regulates CRC resistance to 5-FU via PI3K/AKT/GSK3ß pathway-mediated modulation of apoptotic resistance and EMT induction, highlighting ECM1 as a promising target for therapeutic intervention for efforts aimed at overcoming chemoresistance in CRC patients.
ABSTRACT
In prior reports, extracellular matrix protein 1 (ECM1) upregulation has been reported in colorectal cancer (CRC) patient tumor tissues, and has been suggested to be related to the metastatic progression of CRC, although the underlying mechanisms have yet to be clarified. In this study, we found that ECM1 was overexpressed in both CRC tissues and cell lines. Upregulation of ECM1 was correlated with tumor size, lymph node status and TNM stage in CRC patients. Knocking down ECM1 suppressed CRC cell growth, migration and invasion, in addition to reducing the expression of Vimentin and increasing E-cadherin expression. The overexpression of ECM1, in contrast, yielded the opposite phenotypic outcomes while also promoting the expression of p-AKT, p-GSK3ß, and Snail, which were downregulated when ECM1 was knocked down. Treatment with LY294002 and 740 Y-P reversed the impact upregulation and downregulation of ECM1 on CRC cell metastasis and associated EMT induction. In vivo analyses confirmed that ECM1 overexpression was able to enhance EMT induction and CRC tumor progression. In conclusion, ECM1 influences CRC development and progression in an oncogenic manner, and regulates CRC metastasis and EMT processes via the PI3K/AKT/GSK3ß/Snail signaling axis.
