Active surveillance of low-grade prostate cancer using the SurACaP Criteria: A multi-institutional series with a median follow-up of 10years.

PURPOSE: To report on the oncological outcomes of active surveillance (AS) in low-grade prostate cancer (PCa) patients using the French SurACaP protocol, with a focus on long-term outcomes. METHODS: This multicenter study recruited patients with low-grade PCa between 2007 and 2013 in four referral centers in France. The cohort included patients meeting the SurACaP inclusion criteria, i.e., aged ≤75years, with low-grade PCa (i.e., ISUP 1), clinical stage T1c/T2a, PSA ≤10ng/mL and ≤3 positive cores and tumor length ≤3mm per core. The SurACaP protocol included a digital rectal examination every six months, PSA level measurement every three months for the first two years after inclusion and twice a year thereafter, a confirmatory biopsy in the first year after inclusion, and then follow-up biopsy every two years or if disease progression was suspected. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) was progressively included over the study period. RESULTS: A total of 86 consecutive patients were included, with a median follow-up of 10.6 years. Only one patient developed metastases and died of PCa. The estimated rates of grade reclassification and treatment-free survival at 15 years were 53.4% and 21.2%, respectively. A negative mpMRI at baseline and a negative confirmatory biopsy were significantly associated with a lower risk of disease progression (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: AS using the French SurACaP protocol is a safe and valuable strategy for patients with low-risk PCa, with excellent oncological outcomes after more than 10 years' follow-up. Future studies are crucial to broaden the inclusion criteria and develop a personalized, risk based AS protocol with the aim of de-escalating follow-up examinations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Grade 4.

Active surveillance in favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A single-center experience.

PURPOSE: To report the long-term oncological outcomes of active surveillance (AS) in selected patients with favorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: A retrospective database review of two academic centers was conducted to identify favorable IR PCa patients initially managed by AS between 2014 and 2022. Favorable IR PCa was defined by the presence of one single element of IR disease (i.e., PSA 10-20ng/mL, Gleason Grade Group [GG] 2, or cT2b). All patients were diagnosed and followed up according to a contemporary scheme, including MRI and image-guided biopsies. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients met our inclusion criteria and the median follow-up was 56months. During follow-up, there were no cases of metastasis or death due to PCa, but 6 deaths due to competing causes. A total of 25 (44%) and 6 patients (11%) had definitive treatment and GG 3 reclassification during follow-up, respectively. In multivariable Cox hazard regression analysis, the risk of undergoing definitive treatment was significantly associated with PSA density>0.15 (HR: 4.82, 95% CI: 1.47 to 15; P=0.01) and PI-RADS 4-5 lesions on mpMRI (HR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.06 to 5.19; P=0.006). Interestingly, tumor burden (P=0.3) and GG (P=0.7) on biopsy were not associated with definitive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: AS is a safe and valuable strategy for well-selected patients with favorable IR prostate cancer, with excellent oncological outcomes after five years' follow-up.

Mid-term oncologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy in lymph node metastatic prostate cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: Lymph node invasion (LNI) has been reported in 10-15% of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy (RP). The objective of this study was to describe the mid-term oncological outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with metastatic lymph node. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study at two French referral centers including consecutive cN0 PCa patients who underwent RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection and had lymph node metastases on final pathological analysis (pN1) between January 2000 and May 2020. Follow-up was per institution, which generally included a PSA level measurement every 3 to 12 months for 5 years and annually thereafter. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were included: two (1.6%) low-risk, 64 (52%) intermediate-risk and 57 (46.4%) high-risk PCa according to the D'Amico risk classification. The median number of nodes removed and metastatic nodes per patient was 15 (IQR 11-22) and 1 (IQR 1-2), respectively. Adverse pathological features, i.e., ≥pT3a stage, ISUP grade ≥3, and positive surgical margins were reported in 113 (91.9%), 103 (83.7%), and 73 (59%) of cases, respectively. Postoperative treatment was administered in 104 patients, including radiotherapy alone (n=6), androgen deprivation therapy alone (n=27) or combination with androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy (n=71). The mean follow-up was 42.7 months. The estimated 3-year biochemical-free survival, clinical recurrence-free survival, and cancer-specific survival was 66% and 85% and 98.8%, respectively. In Cox regression analysis, the number of metastatic nodes was associated with clinical recurrence (P=0.04) and a persistently elevated PSA with biochemical recurrence (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The management of lymph node metastatic PCa patients is challenging. Risk stratification of node-positive patients, based on postoperative PSA levels and pathologic features being identified, should help physicians determine which patient would best benefit from multimodal treatment.

[Home uroflowmetry technics and clinical relevance: A narrative review]. / Techniques et intérêt clinique de la débitmétrie à domicile : une revue de la littérature.

INTRODUCTION: Urine flowmetry (UF) is a key non-invasive urodynamic test for the evaluation of the voiding phase in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Traditional free urodynamic testing (FUT) performed on a one-time basis in the office is limited by difficulty in capturing normal voiding and high intrapatient variability in urine flow parameters. Home measurement of urine flow by the patient could be a way to obtain multiple data in real-life conditions, addressing its limitations. The objective of this article was to review the literature on the different techniques of home uroflowmetry (HUF) and their clinical interest in comparison with FUT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search on the PubMed database using the key words "Urodynamics, Uroflowmetry, non-invasive urodynamics, Ambulatory urodynamics, bladder outlet obstruction, male LUTS" was performed to find articles in English or French that had been published with no time limit and March 2022. The sorting by reading the abstract allowed the selection of all articles describing and/or evaluating a HUF technique that were read entirely according to the same collection grid to propose a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Thirty-one articles were identified, selected, and analyzed. Simple and inexpensive techniques by timing or use of funnels reliably and reproducibly estimate the average and maximum urine flow in relation to the FUT, without providing a complete flow curve. More sophisticated electronic or sonometric methods, some using connected mobile applications, present results that are more consistent with ICS recommendations for flow measurement. With the possibility of studying the average of several values of the maximum urinary flow (Qmax) captured during micturition in physiological conditions, some studies suggest a gain in diagnostic value in the evaluation of the emptying phase and lower urinary tract symptoms in men. However, the literature is sparse, old and the clinical benefits are not yet proven. CONCLUSION: There is a wide range of techniques for measuring urine flow in the patient's home, all of which aim to fill the gaps in conventional urine flow measurement. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the acceptability of this type of measurement by patients, the existence of a real clinical benefit, to assess the cost/benefit balance and finally to define a possible place for home uroflowmetry in daily practice, compared with traditional free flowmetry and invasive urodynamics (pressure-flow test).

[Place of preperitoneal pelvic packing in severe pelvic traumatisms: 20 cases in a French level 1 trauma center]. / Place du packing pré-péritonéal pelvien dans les traumatismes graves du bassin : étude à partir de 20 cas réalisés dans un trauma center de niveau 1 français.

BACKGROUND: The overall mortality of hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic trauma is high. Their management is controversial concerning places of arterioembolization and pelvic packing associated with pelvic stabilization. The aim of this study was to collect the pre-peritoneal pelvic packing (PPP) performed in our institution over 10years in order to propose a management algorithm. METHOD: From January 2010 to December 2020, all patients with a hemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture who had PPP combined with pelvic stabilization were included. Data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. The main judgement criteria were early hemorrhage-induced mortality (<24h) and overall mortality (<30d). RESULTS: Twenty patients had PPP out of 287 polytrauma patients with pelvic fracture. The first-line PPP proposed in our algorithm significantly reduced the number of red blood cells (RBCs) (P=0.0231) and improved systolic blood pressure (SBP) (P<0.001) within 24hours of first-line PPP (compared with preoperative). Six patients (30%) were embolized postoperatively for active bleeding not necessarily pelvic. The overall mortality at 30days was 50% (10/20). CONCLUSION: PPP is a fast, easy, effective and safe procedure for venous, bone and sometimes arterial bleeding. PPP is part of damage control surgery and we propose it as a first-line procedure. AE remains complementary in a second step.

[Learning of self-catheterization: For whom? Why? How?] / Éducations aux auto-sondages : pour quels patients ? Pourquoi ? Comment ?

Since the 1970s, self-catheterization is the preferred method of urine drainage in case of urinary retention of neurological etiology (paraplegia, multiple sclerosis…) and non-neurological cause (benign prostatic hypertrophy, acontractile bladder of the elderly subject…). The main objective is to allow the physiological alternation of filling and complete emptying phases, in order to preserve the renal function and prevent urinary infections. The learning of self-catheterization is simple but requires a therapeutic education session with trained personnel, at home or in a specialized center. Cognitive disorders, poor vision, lack of dexterity or lack of knowledge of urogenital anatomy are the main limitations to their implementation. Their success depends on the frequency of catheterization (every 4h), which is performed in a clean but non-sterile manner. The benefit/risk ratio is largely in favor of using them to replace the indwelling probe whenever possible.