Cost saving in implementing ERAS protocol in emergency abdominal surgery.

INTRODUCTION: ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol is now proposed as the standard of care in elective major abdominal surgery. Implementation of the ERAS protocol in emergency setting has been proposed but his economic impact has not been investigated. Aim of this study was to evaluate the cost saving of implementing ERAS in abdominal emergency surgery in a single institution. METHODS: A group of 80 consecutive patients treated by ERAS protocol for gastrointestinal emergency surgery in 2021 was compared with an analogue group of 75 consecutive patients treated by the same surgery the year before implementation of ERAS protocol. Adhesion to postoperative items, length of stay, morbidity and mortality were recorded. Cost saving analysis was performed. RESULTS: 50% Adhesion to postoperative items was reached on day 2 in the ERAS group in mean. Laparoscopic approach was 40 vs 12% in ERAS and control group respectively (p ,002). Length of stay was shorter in ERAS group by 3 days (9 vs 12 days p ,002). Morbidity and mortality rate were similar in both groups. The ERAS group had a mean cost saving of 1022,78 € per patient. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS protocol implementation in the abdominal emergency setting is cost effective resulting in a significant shorter length of stay and cost saving per patient.

Risk Factors for Prolonged Postoperative Ileus in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery: An Observational Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Prolonged Postoperative Ileus (PPOI) after abdominal surgery may affect unfavourably the patient recovery. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of PPOI in patients elective for colorectal resection and investigate perioperative variables associated with PPOI. METHODS: A consecutive series of 428 patients undergoing colorectal resection (median age 72, range 24-92, years; men/women ratio 1.14) were analyzed. Data were extracted retrospectively throughout a five-year period from an electronic prospectively maintained database. PPOI was defined as the need for postoperative insertion of a nasogastric tube in a patient experiencing nausea and two episodes of vomiting and further showing absence of adequate bowel function (absence of flatus/stool) with lack of bowel sounds and abdominal distension. RESULTS: Incidence of PPOI was 7% [95% confidence interval (95%CI), 4.8-9.9%]. Mean hospital stay was 8 days longer in patients with PPOI. Male gender, cancer, cardiac and respiratory co-morbidity, rectal resection, open/converted access, duration of operation, stoma formation and body mass index were associated with PPOI at univariate analysis (0.001< P< 0.048). PPOI was independently associated with male gender [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 4.2; 95%CI, 1.5-11.5], stoma formation (OR, 2.8; 95%CI, 1.2-6.8) and obesity (OR of obese vs. normal weight patients, 3.8, 95%CI, 1.2-12.0). CONCLUSION: After colorectal resection, PPOI leads to a prolonged hospital stay and slower patient's recovery. An international standardized definition of PPOI is strongly needed to make comparable results from researches and to reliably identify patients with increased risk, also to improve the therapeutic preventive policies in these patients.