ABSTRACT
In this study Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) data recorded from mouse mammary glands cancer cells (4T1 cell line) was used to assess information regarding differences between control, death and viable cells after Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) treatment. The treatment used nanoemulsions (NE/PS) loaded with different chloroaluminumphthalocyanine (ClAlP) photosensitizer (PS) contents (5 and 10 µmol × L-1) and illumination (660 nm wavelength) at 10 J × cm-2 (10 minutes). The SERS data revealed significant molecular alterations in proteins and lipids due to the PDT treatment. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied to analyze the data recorded. Three-dimensional and well reproductive PCA scatter plots were obtained, revealing that two clusters of dead cells were well separated from one another and from control cluster. Overlap between two clusters of viable cells was observed, though well separated from control cluster. Moreover, the data analysis also pointed out necrosis as the main cell death mechanism induced by the PDT, in agreement with the literature. Finally, Raman modes peaking at 608 cm-1 (proteins) and 1231 cm-1 (lipids) can be selected for follow up of survival rate of neoplastic cells after PDT. We envisage that this finding is key to contribute to a quick development of quantitative infrared thermography imaging.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Indoles/pharmacology , Organometallic Compounds/pharmacology , Photochemotherapy/methods , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Animals , Cell Death/drug effects , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Survival/drug effects , Indoles/administration & dosage , Mice , Nanotechnology , Organometallic Compounds/administration & dosage , Photosensitizing Agents/administration & dosage , Principal Component Analysis , Spectrum Analysis, Raman/methodsABSTRACT
Photodynamic therapy is a well-established and clinically approved treatment for several types of cancer. Antineoplastic photodynamic therapy is based on photosensitizers, i.e., drugs that absorb photons translating light energy into a chemical potential that damages tumor tissues. Despite the encouraging clinical results with the approved photosensitizers available today, the prolonged skin phototoxicity, poor selectivity for diseased tissues, hydrophobic nature, and extended retention in the host organism shown by these drugs have stimulated researchers to develop new formulations for photodynamic therapy. In this context, due to their amphiphilic characteristic (compatibility with both hydrophobic and hydrophilic substances), liposomes have proven to be suitable carriers for photosensitizers, improving the photophysical properties of the photosensitizers. Moreover, as nanostructured drug delivery systems, liposomes improve the efficiency and safety of antineoplastic photodynamic therapy, mainly by the classical phenomenon of extended permeation and retention. Therefore, the association of photosensitizers with liposomes has been extensively studied. In this review, both current knowledge and future perspectives on liposomal carriers for antineoplastic photodynamic therapy are critically discussed.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Photochemotherapy/methods , Photosensitizing Agents/administration & dosage , Administration, Topical , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , LiposomesABSTRACT
Photodynamic therapy is a well-established and clinically approved treatment for several types of cancer. Antineoplastic photodynamic therapy is based on photosensitizers, i.e., drugs that absorb photons translating light energy into a chemical potential that damages tumor tissues. Despite the encouraging clinical results with the approved photosensitizers available today, the prolonged skin phototoxicity, poor selectivity for diseased tissues, hydrophobic nature, and extended retention in the host organism shown by these drugs have stimulated researchers to develop new formulations for photodynamic therapy. In this context, due to their amphiphilic characteristic (compatibility with both hydrophobic and hydrophilic substances), liposomes have proven to be suitable carriers for photosensitizers, improving the photophysical properties of the photosensitizers. Moreover, as nanostructured drug delivery systems, liposomes improve the efficiency and safety of antineoplastic photodynamic therapy, mainly by the classical phenomenon of extended permeation and retention. Therefore, the association of photosensitizers with liposomes has been extensively studied. In this review, both current knowledge and future perspectives on liposomal carriers for antineoplastic photodynamic therapy are critically discussed.
Subject(s)
Humans , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Photochemotherapy/methods , Photosensitizing Agents/administration & dosage , Administration, Topical , Injections, Intravenous , LiposomesABSTRACT
In this study, oral carcinoma cells were used to evaluate chloroaluminum-phthalocyanine encapsulated in liposomes as the photosensitizer agent in support of photodynamic therapy (PDT). The genotoxicity and cytotoxicity behavior of the encapsulated photosensitizer in both dark and under irradiation using the 670-nm laser were investigated with the classical trypan blue cell viability test, the acridine orange/ethidium bromide staining organelles test, micronucleus formation frequency, DNA fragmentation, and cell morphology. The cell morphology investigation was carried out using light and electronic microscopes. Our findings after PDT include reduction in cell viability (95%) associated with morphologic alterations. The neoplastic cell destruction was predominantly started by a necrotic process, according to the assay with acridine orange and ethidium bromide, and this was confirmed by electronic microscopy analysis. Neither the PDT agent nor laser irradiation alone showed cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, or even morphologic alterations. Our results reinforce the efficiency of light-irradiated chloroaluminum-phthalocyanine in inducing a positive effect of PDT.
