Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 29(7): 863-875, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37068548

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Prudent handling of reported antibiotic allergies is an important aspect of antibiotic stewardship. The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) constituted a multidisciplinary expert committee to provide evidence-based recommendations for bedside decision-making in antibiotic therapy in patients that report an antibiotic allergy. METHODS: The guideline committee generated 12 key questions, most of which were population, intervention, comparison, and outcome questions relevant to both children and adults with suspected antibiotic allergies. For each question, a systematic literature search was performed and reviewed for the best available evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The quality of evidence was graded from very low to high, and recommendations were formulated in structured discussions as strong or weak. RESULTS: Sixty recommendations were provided for suspected allergy to ß-lactam antibiotics (BLAs) and non-ß-lactam antibiotics. Owing to the absence of randomized controlled trials in this field, the underlying evidence was predominantly graded as low or very low. Available data support that a detailed allergy history should always be performed and critically appraised. When cross-allergy between BLA groups is not to be expected due to the absence of molecular similarity of the side chains, the patient can be safely exposed to the alternative BLA. An exception to this rule is severe delayed-type reactions in which re-exposure to a BLA should only be considered after consultation with a multidisciplinary team. CONCLUSIONS: Accumulated scientific data now support a more liberal approach that better balances the benefits of treatment with first choice and usually smaller spectrum antibiotics with appropriate avoidance of antibiotics in case of a truly high risk of a (severe) allergic reaction. In The Netherlands, a formal guideline was developed that provides recommendations for the approach toward suspected allergy to BLA and frequently used non-ß-lactam antibiotics, thereby strongly supporting antimicrobial stewardship.


Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , Drug Hypersensitivity , Hypersensitivity , Adult , Child , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , beta-Lactams/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/drug therapy
2.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1642020 Mar 25.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32392007

ABSTRACT

The current guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of primary respiratory infections are still useful during the COVID-19 epidemic.Telephone triage of patients with respiratory complaints aims to identify patients with complications or an increased risk of complications.There are no indications to test for SARS-CoV-2 virus in general practice.During this COVID-19 epidemic, protective clothing is recommended in all physical contacts with patients with respiratory complaints.There is no reason to be cautious about using NSAIDs in patients suspected of COVID-19.Amoxicillin is first choice treatment for respiratory infections during the COVID-19 epidemic; there is lack of evidence to support azithromycin as a first choice.Respiratory rate > 24 / min or saturation <92-94% indicate imminent respiratory decompensation and may be reasons for referral.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , General Practice , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Aged, 80 and over , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Female , General Practice/methods , General Practice/standards , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Triage
3.
Br J Sports Med ; 52(15): 956, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29514819

ABSTRACT

This guideline aimed to advance current understandings regarding the diagnosis, prevention and therapeutic interventions for ankle sprains by updating the existing guideline and incorporate new research. A secondary objective was to provide an update related to the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic procedures, therapeutic interventions and prevention strategies. It was posited that subsequent interaction of clinicians with this guideline could help reduce health impairments and patient burden associated with this prevalent musculoskeletal injury. The previous guideline provided evidence that the severity of ligament damage can be assessed most reliably by delayed physical examination (4-5 days post trauma). After correct diagnosis, it can be stated that even though a short time of immobilisation may be helpful in relieving pain and swelling, the patient with an acute lateral ankle ligament rupture benefits most from use of tape or a brace in combination with an exercise programme.New in this update: Participation in certain sports is associated with a heightened risk of sustaining a lateral ankle sprain. Care should be taken with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) usage after an ankle sprain. They may be used to reduce pain and swelling, but usage is not without complications and NSAIDs may suppress the natural healing process. Concerning treatment, supervised exercise-based programmes preferred over passive modalities as it stimulates the recovery of functional joint stability. Surgery should be reserved for cases that do not respond to thorough and comprehensive exercise-based treatment. For the prevention of recurrent lateral ankle sprains, ankle braces should be considered as an efficacious option.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries/diagnosis , Ankle Injuries/prevention & control , Ankle Injuries/therapy , Sprains and Strains/diagnosis , Sprains and Strains/prevention & control , Sprains and Strains/therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Athletic Injuries/therapy , Braces , Humans , Lateral Ligament, Ankle/injuries , Physical Examination , Risk Factors , Sports Medicine
4.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 158: A8659, 2014.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25690070

ABSTRACT

The revised guideline on 'Acute diarrhoea' from the Dutch College of General Practitioners covers the diagnosis and management of suspected acute infectious diarrhoea. Acute diarrhoea resulting from infectious gastroenteritis is often caused by a virus and is usually self-limiting; stool testing is rarely indicated. The main complication of acute diarrhoea is dehydration, although this is rare in the Netherlands. Children under 2 years old and patients over 70 are at an increased risk of dehydration. Dehydration is a clinical diagnosis based on a combination of patient history and physical examination. DNA diagnostic methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are now available for stool testing, in addition to stool culture and the triple faeces test (TFT). PCR is preferred for its better test properties. Treatment with oral rehydration salts (ORS) is indicated for patients with dehydration and may also be useful in patients at an increased risk of this event. Acute diarrhoea after hospitalisation or after visiting the tropics or subtropics merits special attention on account of the risk of infection with unusual pathogens and the consequences with regard to management.


Subject(s)
Diarrhea/diagnosis , Diarrhea/therapy , General Practitioners/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Acute Disease , Age Factors , Dehydration/complications , Dehydration/etiology , Fluid Therapy , Humans , Netherlands , Societies, Medical
5.
Br J Sports Med ; 46(12): 854-60, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22522586

ABSTRACT

Ankle injuries are a huge medical and socioeconomic problem. Many people have a traumatic injury of the ankle, most of which are a result of sports. Total costs of treatment and work absenteeism due to ankle injuries are high. The prevention of recurrences can result in large savings on medical costs. A multidisciplinary clinical practice guideline was developed with the aim to prevent further health impairment of patients with acute lateral ankle ligament injuries by giving recommendations with respect to improved diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities. The recommendations are based on evidence from published scientific research, which was extensively discussed by the guideline committee. This clinical guideline is helpful for healthcare providers who are involved in the management of patients with ankle injuries.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries/prevention & control , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Sprains and Strains/prevention & control , Ankle Injuries/diagnosis , Ankle Injuries/therapy , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Athletic Injuries/therapy , Braces , Evidence-Based Medicine , Exercise Therapy/methods , Health Personnel , Humans , Hypothermia, Induced/methods , Ice , Immobilization/methods , Interprofessional Relations , Ligaments, Articular/injuries , Physical Therapy Modalities , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prognosis , Rehabilitation, Vocational/methods , Risk Factors , Sprains and Strains/diagnosis , Sprains and Strains/therapy , Surgical Tape
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...