Greenhouse gas emissions from lignocellulose-amended soil treatment areas for removal of nitrogen from wastewater.

Lignocellulose-amended, layered soil treatment areas (STAs) remove nitrogen (N) passively from wastewater by sequential nitrification and denitrification. As wastewater percolates through the STA, the top sand layer promotes nitrification, and the lower, lignocellulos-amended sand layer promotes heterotrophic denitrification. Layered STAs can remove large amounts of N from wastewater, which may increase their emissions of CO2, N2O, and CH4 to the atmosphere. We measured greenhouse gas (GHG) flux from sawdust-amended (Experimental) and sand-only (Control) STAs installed in three homes in southeastern Massachusetts, USA. The Experimental STAs did not emit significantly more GHGs to the atmosphere than Control STAs receiving the same wastewater inputs, and both Control and Experimental STAs emitted more CO2 and N2O - but not CH4 - than soil not treating wastewater. Median (range) flux (µmol m-2 s-1) for all homes for the Control STAs was 7.6 (0.8-23.0), 0.0001 (-0.0004-0.004), and 0.0008 (0-0.02) for CO2, CH4 and N2O, respectively, whereas values for the Experimental STAs were 6.6 (0.3-24.3), 0 (-0.0005-0.005), and 0.0004 (0-0.02) for CO2, CH4 and N2O, respectively. Despite the absence of differences in flux between Control and Experimental STAs, the Experimental STA had significantly higher subsurface GHG levels than the Control STA, suggesting microbial consumption of excess gas levels near the ground surface in the Experimental STA. The flux of GHGs from Experimental and Control STAs was controlled chiefly by temperature, soil moisture, and subsurface GHG concentrations. Total emissions (gCO2e capita-1 day-1) were higher than those reported by others for conventional STAs, with mean values ranging from 0 to 1835 for septic tanks, and from 30 to 1938 for STAs. Our results suggest that, despite a higher capacity to remove N from wastewater, layered STAs may have limited impact on air quality compared to conventional STAs.

Greenhouse gas emissions from advanced nitrogen-removal onsite wastewater treatment systems.

Advanced onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) designed to remove nitrogen from residential wastewater play an important role in protecting environmental and public health. Nevertheless, the microbial processes involved in treatment produce greenhouse gases (GHGs) that contribute to global climate change, including CO2, CH4, N2O. We measured GHG emissions from 27 advanced N-removal OWTS in the towns of Jamestown and Charlestown, Rhode Island, USA, and assessed differences in flux based on OWTS technology, home occupancy (year-round vs. seasonal), and zone within the system (oxic vs. anoxic/hypoxic). We also investigated the relationship between flux and wastewater properties. Flux values for CO2, CH4, and N2O ranged from -0.44 to 61.8, -0.0029 to 25.3, and -0.02 to 0.23 µmol GHG m-2 s-1, respectively. CO2 and N2O flux varied among technologies, whereas occupancy pattern did not significantly impact any GHG fluxes. CO2 and CH4 - but not N2O - flux was significantly higher in the anoxic/hypoxic zone than in the oxic zone. Greenhouse gas fluxes in the oxic zone were not related to any wastewater properties. CO2 and CH4 flux from the anoxic/hypoxic zone peaked at ~22-23 °C, and was negatively correlated with dissolved oxygen levels, the latter suggesting that CO2 and CH4 flux result primarily from anaerobic respiration. Ammonium concentration and CH4 flux were positively correlated, likely due to inhibition of CH4 oxidation by NH4+. N2O flux in the anoxic/hypoxic zone was not correlated to any wastewater property. We estimate that advanced N-removal OWTS contribute 262 g CO2 equivalents capita-1 day-1, slightly lower than emissions from conventional OWTS. Our results suggest that technology influences CO2 and N2O flux and zone influences CO2 and CH4 flux, while occupancy pattern does not appear to impact GHG flux. Manipulating wastewater properties, such as temperature and dissolved oxygen, may help mitigate GHG emissions from these systems.

Nitrifying and Denitrifying Bacterial Communities in Advanced Nitrogen-Removal Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems.

Advanced N-removal onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) rely on nitrification and denitrification to remove N from wastewater. Despite their use to reduce N contamination, we know little about microbial communities controlling N removal in these systems. We used quantitative polymerase chain reaction and high-throughput sequencing targeting nitrous oxide reductase () and bacterial ammonia monooxygenase () to determine the size, structure, and composition of communities containing these genes. We analyzed water samples from three advanced N-removal technologies in 38 systems in five towns in Rhode Island in August 2016, and in nine systems from one town in June, August, and October 2016. Abundance of ranged from 9.1 × 10 to 9 × 10 copies L and differed among technologies and over time, whereas bacterial abundance ranged from 0 to 1.9 × 10 copies L and was not different among technologies or over time. Richness and diversity of -but not -differed over time, with median Shannon diversity indices ranging from 2.61 in October to 4.53 in August. We observed weak community similarity patterns driven by geography and technology in The most abundant and containing bacteria were associated with water distribution and municipal wastewater treatment plants, such as and species. Our results show that communities in N-removal OWTS technologies differ slightly in terms of size and diversity as a function of time, but not geography, whereas communities are similar across time, technology, and geography. Furthermore, community composition appears to be stable across technologies, geography, and time for .

Comparison of N2O Emissions and Gene Abundances between Wastewater Nitrogen Removal Systems.

Biological nitrogen removal (BNR) systems are increasingly used in the United States in both centralized wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and decentralized advanced onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) to reduce N discharged in wastewater effluent. However, the potential for BNR systems to be sources of nitrous oxide (NO), a potent greenhouse gas, needs to be evaluated to assess their environmental impact. We quantified and compared NO emissions from BNR systems at a WWTP (Field's Point, Providence, RI) and three types of advanced OWTS (Orenco Advantex AX 20, SeptiTech Series D, and Bio-Microbics MicroFAST) in nine Rhode Island residences ( = 3 per type) using cavity ring-down spectroscopy. We also used quantitative polymerase chain reaction to determine the abundance of genes from nitrifying () and denitrifying () microorganisms that may be producing NO in these systems. Nitrous oxide fluxes ranged from -4 × 10 to 3 × 10 µmol NO m s and in general followed the order: centralized WWTP > Advantex > SeptiTech > FAST. In contrast, when NO emissions were normalized by population served and area of treatment tanks, all systems had overlapping ranges. In general, the emissions of NO accounted for a small fraction (<1%) of N removed. There was no significant relationship between the abundance of or genes and NO emissions. This preliminary analysis highlights the need to evaluate NO emissions from wastewater systems as a wider range of technologies are adopted. A better understanding of the mechanisms of NO emissions will also allow us to better manage systems to minimize emissions.

Hell and High Water: Diminished Septic System Performance in Coastal Regions Due to Climate Change.

Climate change may affect the ability of soil-based onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) to treat wastewater in coastal regions of the Northeastern United States. Higher temperatures and water tables can affect treatment by reducing the volume of unsaturated soil and oxygen available for treatment, which may result in greater transport of pathogens, nutrients, and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) to groundwater, jeopardizing public and aquatic ecosystem health. The soil treatment area (STA) of an OWTS removes contaminants as wastewater percolates through the soil. Conventional STAs receive wastewater from the septic tank, with infiltration occurring deeper in the soil profile. In contrast, shallow narrow STAs receive pre-treated wastewater that infiltrates higher in the soil profile, which may make them more resilient to climate change. We used intact soil mesocosms to quantify the water quality functions of a conventional and two types of shallow narrow STAs under present climate (PC; 20°C) and climate change (CC; 25°C, 30 cm elevation in water table). Significantly greater removal of BOD5 was observed under CC for all STA types. Phosphorus removal decreased significantly from 75% (PC) to 66% (CC) in the conventional STA, and from 100% to 71-72% in shallow narrow STAs. No fecal coliform bacteria (FCB) were released under PC, whereas up to 17 and 20 CFU 100 mL-1 were released in conventional and shallow narrow STAs, respectively, under CC. Total N removal increased from 14% (PC) to 19% (CC) in the conventional STA, but decreased in shallow narrow STAs, from 6-7% to less than 3.0%. Differences in removal of FCB and total N were not significant. Leaching of N in excess of inputs was also observed in shallow narrow STAs under CC. Our results indicate that climate change can affect contaminant removal from wastewater, with effects dependent on the contaminant and STA type.

Evaluation of water quality functions of conventional and advanced soil-based onsite wastewater treatment systems.

Shallow narrow drainfields are assumed to provide better wastewater renovation than conventional drainfields and are used for protection of surface and ground water. To test this assumption, we evaluated the water quality functions of two advanced onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS) drainfields-shallow narrow (SND) and Geomat (GEO)-and a conventional pipe and stone (P&S) drainfield over 12 mo using replicated ( = 3) intact soil mesocosms. The SND and GEO mesocosms received effluent from a single-pass sand filter, whereas the P&S received septic tank effluent. Between 97.1 and 100% of 5-d biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), fecal coliform bacteria, and total phosphorus (P) were removed in all drainfield types. Total nitrogen (N) removal averaged 12.0% for P&S, 4.8% for SND, and 5.4% for GEO. A mass balance analysis accounted for 95.1% (SND), 94.1% (GEO), and 87.6% (P&S) of N inputs. When the whole treatment train (excluding the septic tank) is considered, advanced systems, including sand filter pretreatment and SND or GEO soil-based treatment, removed 99.8 to 99.9% of BOD, 100% of fecal coliform bacteria and P, and 26.0 to 27.0% of N. In contrast, the conventional system removed 99.4% of BOD and 100% of fecal coliform bacteria and P but only 12.0% of N. All drainfield types performed similarly for most water quality functions despite differences in placement within the soil profile. However, inclusion of the pretreatment step in advanced system treatment trains results in better N removal than in conventional treatment systems despite higher drainfield N removal rates in the latter.