Combined Rotating Ultra-High-Resolution Spectral Domain OCT and Scheimpflug Imaging for In Vivo Corneal Optical Biopsy.

PURPOSE: This article introduces the Pentacam® Cornea OCT (optical coherence tomography). This advanced corneal imaging system combines rotating ultra-high-resolution spectral domain OCT with sub- 2-micron axial resolution and Scheimpflug photography. The purpose of this study is to present the first experience with the instrument and its potential for corneal diagnostics, including optical biopsy. METHODS: In this prospective study, the Pentacam® Cornea OCT was used to image the corneas of seven patients. The novel wide-angle pericentric scan system enables optimal OCT imaging performance for the corneal layer structure over the entire width of the cornea, including the limbal regions. A detailed analysis of the resulting images assessed the synergism between the OCT and Scheimpflug photography. RESULTS: The Pentacam® Cornea OCT demonstrated significantly improved image resolution and ability to individualize corneal layers with high quality. There is a synergism between the OCT high-definition signal to individualize details on the cornea and Scheimpflug photography to detect and quantify corneal scattering. The noncontact exam was proven safe, user-friendly, and effective for enabling optical biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Pentacam® Cornea OCT is an advancement in corneal imaging technology. The ultra-high-resolution spectral domain OCT and Scheimpflug photography provide unprecedented detail and resolution, enabling optical biopsy and improving the understanding of corneal pathology. Further studies are necessary to compare and analyze the tomographic reconstructions of the cornea with the different wavelengths, which may provide helpful information for diagnosing and managing corneal diseases.

Keratoconus and Corneal Ectasia with Relatively Low Keratometry.

INTRODUCTION: The study aims to demonstrate and estimate the prevalence of clinical corneal ectasia and keratoconus (KC) in patients with relatively low keratometry (low-K KC). METHODS: In a retrospective, analytical, and non-interventionist study, one eye was randomly selected from 1054 patients from the original Tomographic Biomechanical Index (TBIv1) study and the external validation (from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and Milan, Italy clinics). Patients were stratified into three groups. Group 1 included 736 normal patients, and groups 2 and 3 included 318 patients with clinical KC in both eyes, divided into low-K KC (90 patients) and high-K KC (228 patients), respectively. All patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmological evaluation along with Pentacam and Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) examinations. Cases with maximum mean zone 3 mm keratometry (Kmax zone mean 3 mm) lower than 47.6 diopters (D) were considered as low-keratometry keratoconus, and cases with Kmax zone mean 3 mm higher than 47.6 D were regarded as high-keratometry keratoconus. RESULTS: Ninety (28.30%) of the 318 KC group presented ectasia with low-keratometric values (low-Kmax). The average age in the normal group was 39.28 years (range 6.99-90.12), in the low-Kmax KC group it was 37.49 (range 13.35-78.45), and in the high-Kmax KC group it was 34.22 years (range 12.7-80.34). Mean and SD values and median (range), respectively, of some corneal tomographic and biomechanical parameters evaluated from the low-Kmax KC group were as follows: Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display (BAD-D) 3.79 ± 1.62 and 3.66 (0.83-9.73); Pentacam random forest index (PRFI) 0.78 ± 0.25 and 0.91 (0.05-1); corneal biomechanical index (CBI) 0.58 ± 0.43 and 0.75 (0-1); TBI 0.93 ± 0.17 and 1 (0.35-1); and stiffness parameter at A1 (SP-A1) 86.16 ± 19.62 and 86.05 (42.94-141.66). CONCLUSION: Relatively low keratometry, with a Kmax lower than 47.6 D, can occur in up to 28.30% of clinical keratoconus. These cases have a less severe presentation of the disease. Future studies involving larger populations and prospective designs are necessary to confirm the prevalence of keratoconus with low keratometry and define prognostic factors in such cases.

Investigation of How Corneal Densitometry Artefacts Affect the Imaging of Normal and Keratoconic Corneas.

PURPOSE: To investigate corneal densitometry artefacts found in Pentacam Scheimpflug scans and their potential effect on assessing keratoconic (KC) corneas compared to normal (N) corneas. METHODS: The current study utilises Pentacam data of 458 N eyes, aged 35.6 ± 15.8 (range 10-87), referred to as the "N group", and 314 KC eyes, aged 31.6 ± 10.8 (range 10-72), referred to as the "KC group", where densitometry data were extracted and analysed via a custom-built MATLAB code. Radial summations of the densitometry were calculated at diameters ranging from 0.5 mm to 5.0 mm. The minimum normalised radial summation of densitometry (NRSD) value and angle were determined at each diameter and then linked. KC cone locations and areas of pathology were determined, and a comparison between N and KC groups was carried out both within the averaged area of pathology and over the corneal surface. RESULTS: Joining minimum NRSD trajectory points marked a clear distortion line pointing to the nasal-superior direction at 65° from the nasal meridian. The findings were found to be independent of eye laterality or ocular condition. Consistency was detected in the right and left eyes among both the N and KC groups. The location of the KC cone centre and the area of pathology were determined, and the densitometry output was compared both within the area of pathology and over the whole cornea. When the average densitometry was compared between N and KC eyes within the KC area of pathology, the N group recorded a 16.37 ± 3.15 normalised grey-scale unit (NGSU), and the KC group recorded 17.74 ± 3.4 NGSU (p = 0.0001). However, when the whole cornea was considered, the N group recorded 16.71 ± 5.5 NGSU, and the KC group recorded 15.72 ± 3.98 NGSU (p = 0.0467). A weak correlation was found between the Bad D index and NGSU when the whole measured cornea was considered (R = -0.01); however, a better correlation was recorded within the KC area of pathology (R = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Nasal-superior artefacts are observed in the densitometry Pentacam maps, and analysis shows no significant differences in their appearance between N or KC corneas. When analysing KC corneas, it was found that the cone positions are mostly on the temporal-inferior side of the cornea, opposite to the densitometry artefact NRSD trajectory. The analysis suggests that the corneal densitometry artefacts do not interfere with the KC area of pathology as it reaches its extreme in the opposite direction; therefore, weighting the densitometry map to increase the contribution of the inferior-temporal cornea and decreasing that of the superior-nasal area would improve the classification or identification of KC if densitometry is to be used as a KC metric.

Multimodal diagnostics for keratoconus and ectatic corneal diseases: a paradigm shift.

Different diagnostic approaches for ectatic corneal diseases (ECD) include screening, diagnosis confirmation, classification of the ECD type, severity staging, prognostic evaluation, and clinical follow-up. The comprehensive assessment must start with a directed clinical history. However, multimodal imaging tools, including Placido-disk topography, Scheimpflug three-dimensional (3D) tomography, corneal biomechanical evaluations, and layered (or segmental) tomography with epithelial thickness by optical coherence tomography (OCT), or digital very high-frequency ultrasound (dVHF-US) serve as fundamental complementary exams for measuring different characteristics of the cornea. Also, ocular wavefront analysis, axial length measurements, corneal specular or confocal microscopy, and genetic or molecular biology tests are relevant for clinical decisions. Artificial intelligence enhances interpretation and enables combining such a plethora of data, boosting accuracy and facilitating clinical decisions. The applications of diagnostic information for individualized treatments became relevant concerning the therapeutic refractive procedures that emerged as alternatives to keratoplasty. The first paradigm shift concerns the surgical management of patients with ECD with different techniques, such as crosslinking and intrastromal corneal ring segments. A second paradigm shift involved the quest for identifying patients at higher risk of progressive iatrogenic ectasia after elective refractive corrections on the cornea. Beyond augmenting the sensitivity to detect very mild (subclinical or fruste) forms of ECD, ectasia risk assessment evolved to characterize the inherent susceptibility for ectasia development and progression. Furthermore, ectasia risk is also related to environmental factors, including eye rubbing and the relational impact of the surgical procedure on the cornea.

Biomechanics in Keratoconus Diagnosis.

Purpose: To prospectively review the importance of biomechanical assessment in the screening, diagnosis, prognosis, individualized planning, and clinical follow-up for ectatic corneal diseases.Methods: We demonstrate two commercially available devices to assess the corneal biomechanics in vivo, the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA, Reichester, NY, USA) and the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). Novel devices have been demonstrated to provide in vivo biomechanical measurements, including Brillouin optical microscopy and OCT elastography. Conclusion: The integration of biomechanical data and other data from multimodal refractive imaging using artificial intelligence demonstrated the ability to enhance accuracy in diagnosing ectatic corneal diseases.

In Vivo Corneal Stiffness Mapping by the Stress-Strain Index Maps and Brillouin Microscopy.

The study of corneal stiffness in vivo has numerous clinical applications such as the measurement of intraocular pressure, the preoperative screening for iatrogenic ectasia after laser vision correction surgery and the diagnosis and treatment of corneal ectatic diseases such as keratoconus. The localised aspect of the microstructure deterioration in keratoconus leading to local biomechanical softening, corneal bulging, irregular astigmatism and ultimately loss of vision boosted the need to map the corneal stiffness to identify the regional biomechanical failure. Currently, two methods to map the corneal stiffness in vivo are integrated into devices that are either already commercially available or about to be commercialised: the stress-strain index (SSI) maps and the Brillouin Microscopy (BM). The former method produces 2D map of stiffness across the corneal surface, developed through numerical simulations using the corneal shape, its microstructure content, and the deformation behaviour under air-puff excitation. It estimates the whole stress-strain behaviour, making it possible to obtain the material tangent modulus under different intraocular pressure levels. On the other hand, BM produces a 3D map of the corneal longitudinal modulus across the corneal surface and thickness. It uses a low-power near-infrared laser beam and through a spectral analysis of the returned signal, it assesses the mechanical compressibility of the tissue as measured by the longitudinal modulus. In this paper, these two techniques are reviewed, and their advantages and limitations discussed.

Introduction and Clinical Validation of an Updated Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure bIOP (v2).

PURPOSE: To improve the stability of the Corvis ST biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure measurements (bIOP) after refractive surgery and its independence of corneal biomechanics. METHODS: A parametric study was carried out using numerical models simulating the behavior of the eye globe under the effects of IOP and Corvis ST external air pressure and used to develop a new algorithm for bIOP; bIOP(v2). It was tested on 528 healthy participants to evaluate correlations with CCT and age. Its ability to compensate for the geometrical changes was tested in 60 LASIK and 80 SMILE patients with six months follow up. The uncorrected Corvis ST IOP (CVS-IOP) and the two versions of biomechanically corrected IOP; bIOP(v1) and bIOP(v2), were compared. RESULTS: In the healthy dataset, bIOP(v2) had weak and non-significant correlation with both CCT (R = -0.048, p = .266) and age (R = 0.085, p = .052). For bIOP(v1), the correlation was non-significant with CCT (R = -0.064, p = .139) but significant with age (R = -0.124, p < .05). In both LASIK and SMILE groups, the median change in bIOP(v2) following surgery was below 1 mmHg at follow-up stages and the interquartile range was smaller than both bIOP(v1) and CVS-IOP. CONCLUSION: The bIOP(v2) algorithm performs better than bIOP(v1) and CVS-IOP in terms of correlation with CCT and age. The bIOP(v2) also demonstrated the smallest variation after LASIK and SMILE refractive surgeries indicating improved ability to compensate for geometrical changes.

Corneal Biomechanics Losses Caused by Refractive Surgery.

Recent advances, specifically in the understanding of the biomechanical properties of the cornea and its response to diseases and surgical interventions, have significantly improved the safety and surgical outcomes of corneal refractive surgery, whose popularity and demand continue to grow worldwide. However, iatrogenic keratectasia resulting from the deterioration in corneal biomechanics caused by surgical interventions, although rare, remains a global concern. On one hand, in vivo biomechanical evaluation, enabled by clinical imaging systems such as the ORA and the Corvis ST, has significantly improved the risk profiling of patients for iatrogenic keratectasia. That is despite the fact the biomechanical metrics provided by these systems are considered indicators of the cornea's overall stiffness rather than its intrinsic material properties. On the other hand, new surgical modalities including SMILE were introduced to offer superior biomechanical performance to LASIK, but this superiority could not be proven clinically, creating more myths than answers. The literature also includes sound evidence that tPRK provided the highest preservation of corneal biomechanics when compared to both LASIK and SMILE. The aim of this review is twofold; to discuss the importance of corneal biomechanical evaluation prior to refractive surgery, and to assess the current understanding of cornea's biomechanical deterioration caused by mainstream corneal refractive surgeries. The review has led to an observation that new imaging techniques, parameters and evaluation systems may be needed to reflect the true advantages of specific refractive techniques and when these advantages are significant enough to offer better protection against post-surgery complications.

Repetibilidade do estudo tomográfico da córnea com Scheimpflug rotacional, em olhos normais, olhos com ceratocone e olhos com ceratocone operados por crosslinking / Repeatability of the tomographic study of the cornea with a rotational Scheimpflug in normal eyes, eyes with keratoconus and eyes with crosslinking for keratoconus

RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar a precisão da tomografia corneana com imagens de Scheimpflug (Pentacam® AXL, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Alemanha) nos padrões de escaneamento com 25 e 50 imagens, verificando sua repetibilidade e reprodutibilidade em olhos normais, com ceratocone e com ceratocone após crosslinking. Métodos Estudo prospectivo, transversal, misto, no qual foram incluídos os pacientes que tinham córneas normais, ou com ceratocone; e não tinham realizado cirurgias corneanas, com exceção do crosslinking. Foram excluídos os pacientes que tivessem realizado outras cirurgias, como implante de anel intracorneano ou transplante de córnea. Foram realizadas três medidas com 25 imagens e três medidas com 50 imagens em cada olho incluído no estudo. Resultados O estudo avaliou 54 olhos de 41 pacientes. Destes, dez (18,52%) olhos eram com córneas normais e sem cirurgia ocular prévia aleatoriamente selecionados de 5 pacientes; 22 (40,74%) olhos aleatoriamente selecionados de 18 pacientes com ceratocone, sem cirurgia ocular prévia; e 22 (40,74%) olhos com ceratocone de 18 pacientes operados por crosslinking. No estudo da repetibilidade, percebemos uma maior variação de valores em todos os índices nos pacientes com ceratocone comparados aos de pacientes com olhos normais, em grande parte dos parâmetros analisados. Conclusão Não houve diferença significativa entre os métodos de escaneamento por 25 e 50 imagens, sendo o escaneamento por 25 imagens mais conveniente. A presença de ceratocone teve impacto negativo na repetibilidade de ambos os tipos de exame, e foi grande a concordância entre os métodos nos três grupos estudados. O coeficiente de repetibilidade permite considerar a relevância clínica dos dados para avaliar a progressão de ceratocone.

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the accuracy of corneal tomography with Scheimpflug images (Pentacam® AXL, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany) in scanning patterns with 25 and 50 images, by analyzing their repeatability and reproducibility in normal eyes, eyes with keratoconus and with keratoconus after crosslinking. Methods Prospective, cross-sectional, mixed study including patients who had normal corneas, or who had keratoconus, who had not undergone corneal surgery, with the exception of crosslinking. Patients who had undergone surgery for intracorneal ring implantation or corneal transplantation were excluded. Three measurements were performed with 25 images and three measurements were performed with 50 images on each eye included in the study. Results The study evaluated a total of 54 eyes of 41 patients. Of these, 10 (18.52%) eyes had normal corneas, without previous eye surgery, 22 (40.74%) were eyes with keratoconus, without previous eye surgery, and 22 (40.74%) were eyes with keratoconus, with crosslinking for keratoconus. In the study of repeatability, we noticed a greater variation of values in all indices in patients with KC compared to those with normal eyes, in most of the parameters analyzed. Conclusion There is no significant difference between the scanning methods with 25 and 50 images. However, 25 scans has advantages that make it the main method suggested. The presence of keratoconus has a negative impact on the repeatability of both types of examination, and there is great agreement between the methods in the three groups studied. The high repeatability coefficient in some parameters suggests that these data should be used with care in the assessment of keratoconus progression.

Investigation of the relationship between contact lens design parameters and refractive changes in Ortho-K.

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between Ortho-K contact lens design parameters and refractive power change of the eye through a parametric mathematical representation. Methods: The current study utilises fully anonymized records of 249 eyes, 132 right eyes, and 117 left eyes from subjects aged 14.1 ± 4.0 years on average (range 9-38 years) which were selected for secondary analysis processing. The data were split into 3 groups (G1 up to 35 days wear, from 10 to 35 days, G2 up to 99 days wear, more than 35-99 days & G3 more than 100 days wear) according to the length of time, in days, that the lenses were worn. Corneal shape was measured before and after contact lens wear using the Medmont E300 topographer, from which height and distance files were read by a custom-built MATLAB code to construct the corneal anterior surface independently. Changes in refractive power pre and post-Ortho-K wear were determined using constructed tangential refractive power maps from which both centrally flattened and annular steepened zones were automatically bounded, hence used to determine the refractive power change. Results: On average, flat Sim-K and steep Sim-K were reduced after Ortho-K lens wear by 1.6 ± 1.3 D and 1.3 ± 1.4 D respectively. The radius of the base curve was correlated with the mean central flattened zone power change strongly in G1 (R = 0.7, p < 0.001) and moderately in G2 (R = 0.4) and G3 (R = 0.4, p < 0.001). Hence, a strong correlation with the base curve was recorded in group G1 and moderate in G2 and G3. The reverse curve was very strongly correlated to the mean central flattened zone power change in G1 (R = 0.8, p < 0.001) and strongly correlated with G2 (R = 0.6, p < 0.001) and G3 (R = 0.7, p < 0.001). The reverse curve was also strongly correlated with the mean annular steepened zone power change among all groups G1, G2, and G3 (R = 0.7, R = 0.6 and R = 0.6) respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although the central corneal refractive power change was strongly correlated to the Ortho-K lens base curve, it characterized only 50% of the target power change. However, the annular steepened zone refractive power change appears to be a clearer predictor of target power change, as there appears to be a one-to-one inverse relationship with the target refractive power correction. Differences between these results and the literature may be a result of the topography software smoothing effect.

Enhanced Diagnostics for Corneal Ectatic Diseases: The Whats, the Whys, and the Hows.

There are different fundamental diagnostic strategies for patients with ectatic corneal diseases (ECDs): screening, confirmation of the diagnosis, classification of the type of ECD, severity staging, prognostic assessment, and clinical follow-up. The conscious application of such strategies enables individualized treatments. The need for improved diagnostics of ECD is related to the advent of therapeutic refractive procedures that are considered prior to keratoplasty. Among such less invasive procedures, we include corneal crosslinking, customized ablations, and intracorneal ring segment implantation. Besides the paradigm shift in managing patients with ECD, enhancing the sensitivity to detect very mild forms of disease, and characterizing the inherent susceptibility for ectasia progression, became relevant for identifying patients at higher risk for progressive iatrogenic ectasia after laser vision correction (LVC). Moreover, the hypothesis that mild keratoconus is a risk factor for delivering a baby with Down's syndrome potentially augments the relevance of the diagnostics of ECD. Multimodal refractive imaging involves different technologies, including Placido-disk corneal topography, Scheimpflug 3-D tomography, segmental or layered tomography with layered epithelial thickness using OCT (optical coherence tomography), and digital very high-frequency ultrasound (VHF-US), and ocular wavefront. Corneal biomechanical assessments and genetic and molecular biology tests have translated to clinical measurements. Artificial intelligence allows for the integration of a plethora of clinical data and has proven its relevance in facilitating clinical decisions, allowing personalized or individualized treatments.

In vivo Assessment of Localised Corneal Biomechanical Deterioration With Keratoconus Progression.

Purpose: To evaluate the regional corneal biomechanical deterioration with keratoconus (KC) progression as measured by the Stress-Strain Index (SSI) maps. Methods: The preoperative examinations of 29 progressive KC cases that were submitted to corneal cross-linking (CXL) were evaluated. The examinations included the tomography and the SSI measured by the Pentacam HR and the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany), respectively. The results were recorded twice, the latter of which was at the last visit before the CXL procedure. The patient-specific SSI maps were built, using data at each examination, based on finite element modelling and employing inverse analysis to represent the regional variation of biomechanical stiffness across the cornea. Results: All cases presented significant shape progression (above the 95% CI of repeatability) in anterior and posterior curvatures and minimum thickness. The overall corneal stiffness as measured by the SSI within the central 8 mm-diameter area underwent slight but significant reductions from the first to the last examination (-0.02 ± 0.02, range: -0.09 to 0, p < 0.001). In all 29 cases, the reduction in stiffness was localised and concentred in the area inside the keratoconus cone. The SSI values inside the cone were significantly lower in the last examination (by 0.15 ± 0.09, range: -0.42 to -0.01, p < 0.001), while the SSI outside the cone presented minimal, non-significant variations (0 ± 0.01, range: -0.04 to 0.01, p = 0.999). Conclusion: It has been observed through the SSI maps that the regional deterioration in stiffness was concerted inside the area of pathology, while only mild non-significant alterations were observed outside the area of pathology.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Topographically and Tomographically Normal Fellow Eyes of Patients With Keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of parameters and indices based on biomechanical measures at discriminating fellow eyes with topographically and tomographically normal corneas in patients with keratoconus from normal control corneas. METHODS: The study included 47 keratoconus suspect eyes, defined as the topographically and tomographically normal fellow eyes of patients with frank keratoconus in the other eye. Eyes were imaged using the Pentacam HR and Corvis ST (both Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH). Fellow eyes were then categorized as topographically/tomographically normal fellow eyes (TNF) and topographically/tomographically borderline fellow eyes (TBF). The ability of each of the Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI), Tomographic and Biomechanical Index (TBI), stiffness parameter at applanation 1 (SP-A1), and stress-strain index (SSI) at discriminating between normal controls and keratoconus suspects was assessed. RESULTS: The TBI had the best discriminative ability with the greatest area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve value of 0.946 for normal controls versus TBF eyes, and 0.824 for normal controls versus TNF eyes. Compared to the TBI AUROC curves, SP-A1 and CBI had AUROC curve values of 0.833 (P = .09) and 0.822 (P = .01) for normal controls versus TBF eyes, respectively, and AUROC curve values of 0.822 (P = .96) and 0.550 (P = .0002) for normal controls versus TNF eyes, respectively. The TBI had the best positive predictive value for TNF and TBF eyes, followed by CBI and SP-A1. CONCLUSIONS: The TBI and the purely biomechanical parameter SP-A1 were of moderate utility in distinguishing between normal and keratoconus suspect eyes. In the absence of topographic/tomographic evidence of keratectasia, an independently abnormal biomechanical parameter may suggest an increased risk of ectasia. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(5):318-325.].

Biomechanical Effects of tPRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE on the Cornea.

Purpose: The objective of this study is to evaluate the in vivo corneal biomechanical response to three laser refractive surgeries. Methods: Two hundred and twenty-seven patients who submitted to transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK), femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), or small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) were included in this study. All cases were examined with the Corvis ST preoperatively (up to 3 months) and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 6 months, and the differences in the main device parameters were assessed. The three groups were matched in age, gender ratio, corneal thickness, refractive error corrections, optical zone diameter, and intraocular pressure. They were also matched in the preoperative biomechanical metrics provided by the Corvis ST including stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), integrated inverse radius (IIR), deformation amplitude (DA), and deformation amplitude 2 mm away from apex and the apical deformation (DARatio2mm). Results: The results demonstrated a significant decrease post-operation in SP-A1 and significant increases in IIR, DA, and DARatio2mm (p < 0.05), all of which indicated reductions in overall corneal stiffness. Inter-procedure comparisons provided evidence that the smallest overall stiffness reduction was in the tPRK group, followed by the SMILE, and then the FS-LASIK group (p < 0.05). These results remained valid after correction for the change in CCT between pre and 6 months post-operation and for the percentage tissue altered. In all three surgery groups, higher degrees of refractive correction resulted in larger overall stiffness losses based on most of the biomechanical metrics. Conclusion: The corneal biomechanical response to the three surgery procedures varied significantly. With similar corneal thickness loss, the reductions in overall corneal stiffness were the highest in FS-LASIK and the lowest in tPRK.

In Vivo Biomechanical Changes Associated With Keratoconus Progression.

PURPOSE: To assess the biomechanical deterioration arising from keratoconus progression in-vivo. METHODS: The preoperative examinations of 32 progressive KC cases that were submitted to corneal cross-linking were evaluated. The examinations included the corneal tomography using the Pentacam HR and biomechanical parameters assessed by the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). The results were recorded at two time points, the latter of which was at the last visit before the CXL procedure. Keratoconus progression was characterised by a significant change in the ABCD system. RESULTS: At the last follow-up visit (41.4 ± 40.9 months) all morphological parameters of the ABCD grading system showed significant deterioration (p < 0.001). The comparative analyses revealed a significant reduction in corneal stiffness expressed by a significant reduction in the stress-strain index (SSI: -0.10 ± 0.06, p < 0.001), the Stiffness parameter A1 (SP-A1: -6.1 ± 12.0 mmHg/mm, p = 0.011), by a significant increase in the integrated Inverse Radius (IIR: 0.95 ± 1.04 mm-1, p < 0.001) and in the deflection amplitude (DA) ratio (0.23 ± 0.58, p = 0.034). A barely significant increase in the DA also pointed towards corneal stiffness reduction. (0.04 ± 0.13 mm, p = 0.056). The SSI and the IIR were the indices with the smallest overlaps between the two examinations. CONCLUSIONS: It has been demonstrated in-vivo that corneal biomechanical deterioration occurs with keratoconus progression. The larger changes observed in the SSI and the IIR when compared to the remaining biomechanical parameters suggests that these parameters could be suitable to assess the corneal stiffness reduction in keratoconus natural progression.

Evaluation of corneal biomechanical behavior in vivo for healthy and keratoconic eyes using the stress-strain index.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the characteristics of corneal material properties in healthy individuals and keratoconic patients using the stress-strain index (SSI). SETTING: Vincieye Clinic in Milan, Italy, and Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrósio in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cross-sectional study. METHODS: Records of 1221 patients were divided into 3 groups: healthy corneas (n = 728), bilateral keratoconus (KC, n = 388), and very asymmetric ectasia (VAE, n = 105) when patients presented with clinical ectasia in 1 eye and normal topography (VAE-NT) in the fellow eye. All patients were examined with Pentacam HR and Corvis ST. Severity of KC cases was stratified according to the Pentacam topographic KC classification. The SSI distribution across the different groups and its correlation with age, biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP), and central corneal thickness (CCT) were assessed. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference between healthy individuals and each of the keratoconic groups ( P < .001) was observed, and a progressive reduction in the SSI was observed across the groups. A significant correlation was observed between the SSI and age in all groups ( P < .010) but KC severe subgroup ( P = .361). No correlation between the SSI and bIOP and CCT was observed in all KC subgroups and VAE-NT groups ( P > .050). Among healthy eyes, there was only a mild correlation between the SSI and bIOP ( R = 0.12, P = .002) and CCT ( R = 0.13, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study estimates the in vivo corneal material properties in healthy individuals and patients with KC using a new method. The SSI showed a progressive deterioration within the advance in disease stages while being relatively independent of bIOP and CCT but positively correlated with age.

New artificial intelligence index based on Scheimpflug corneal tomography to distinguish subclinical keratoconus from healthy corneas.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficiency of an index derived from multiple logistic regression analysis (MLRA) to measure differences in corneal tomography findings between subclinical keratoconus (KC) in 1 eye, corneal ectasia, and healthy corneas. SETTING: 2 private Brazilian ophthalmological centers. DESIGN: Multicenter case-control study. METHODS: This study included 187 eyes with very asymmetric ectasia and with normal corneal topography and tomography (VAE-NTT) in the VAE-NTT group, 2296 eyes with healthy corneas in the control group (CG), and 410 eyes with ectasia in the ectasia group. An index, termed as Boosted Ectasia Susceptibility Tomography Index (BESTi), was derived using MLRA to identify a cutoff point to distinguish patients in the 3 groups. The groups were divided into 2 subgroups with an equal number of patients: validation set and external validation (EV) set. RESULTS: 2893 patients with 2893 eyes were included. BESTi had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 with 86.02% sensitivity (Se) and 83.97% specificity (Sp) between CG and the VAE-NTT group in the EV set, which was significantly greater than those of the Belin-Ambrósio Deviation Index (BAD-D) (AUC: 0.81; Se: 66.67%; Sp: 82.67%; P < .0001) and Pentacam random forest index (PRFI) (AUC: 0.87; Se: 78.49%; Sp: 79.88%; P = .021). CONCLUSIONS: BESTi facilitated early detection of ectasia in subclinical KC and demonstrated higher Se and Sp than PRFI and BAD-D for detecting subclinical KC.

Limitations of Reconstructing Pentacam Rabbit Corneal Tomography by Zernike Polynomials.

The study aims to investigate the likelihood of Zernike polynomial being used for reconstructing rabbit corneal surfaces as scanned by the Pentacam segment tomographer, and hence evaluate the accuracy of corneal power maps calculated from such Zernike fitted surfaces. The study utilised a data set of both eyes of 21 rabbits using a reverse engineering approach for deductive reasoning. Pentacam raw elevation data were fitted to Zernike polynomials of orders 2 to 20. The surface fitting process to Zernike polynomials was carried out using randomly selected 80% of the corneal surface data points, and the root means squared fitting error (RMS) was determined for the other 20% of the surface data following the Pareto principle. The process was carried out for both the anterior and posterior surfaces of the corneal surfaces that were measured via Pentacam scans. Raw elevation data and the fitted corneal surfaces were then used to determine corneal axial and tangential curvature maps. For reconstructed surfaces calculated using the Zernike fitted surfaces, the mean and standard deviation of the error incurred by the fitting were calculated. For power maps computed using the raw elevation data, different levels of discrete cosine transform (DCT) smoothing were employed to infer the smoothing level utilised by the Pentacam device. The RMS error was not significantly improved for Zernike polynomial orders above 12 and 10 when fitting the anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea, respectively. This was noted by the statistically non-significant increase in accuracy when the order was increased beyond these values. The corneal curvature calculations suggest that a smoothing process is employed in the corneal curvature maps outputted by the Pentacam device; however, the exact smoothing method is unknown. Additionally, the results suggest that fitting corneal surfaces to high-order Zernike polynomials will incur a clinical error in the calculation of axial and tangential corneal curvature of at least 0.16 ± 01 D and 0.36 ± 0.02 D, respectively. Rabbit corneal anterior and posterior surfaces scanned via the Pentacam were optimally fitted to orders 12 and 10 Zernike polynomials. This is essential to get stable values of high-order aberrations that are not affected by Zernike polynomial fittings, such as comas for Intracorneal Ring Segments (ICRS) adjustments or spherical aberration for pre-cataract operations. Smoothing was necessary to replicate the corneal curvature maps outputted by the Pentacam tomographer, and fitting corneal surfaces to Zernike polynomials introduces errors in the calculation of both the axial and tangential corneal curvatures.

Effect of Mydriasis-Caused Intraocular Pressure Changes on Corneal Biomechanical Metrics.

Purpose: To evaluate the dependence of biomechanical metrics on intraocular pressure (IOP). Methods: 233 refractive surgery patients were included in this study-all were examined 3 times with the Corvis ST before and after dilation, and the differences (∆) in the main device parameters were assessed. The data collected included the biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP), the central corneal thickness (CCT), and six dynamic corneal response (DCR) parameters, namely DA, DARatio2mm, IIR, SP-A1, CBI, and SSI. Participants were divided into three groups according to the changes in patients' bIOP after mydriasis. Results: Intra-operator repeatability was generally high in most of the DCR parameters obtained before and after dilation. The mean changes in bIOP and CCT after dilation were -0.12 ± 1.36 mmHg and 1.95 ± 5.23 µm, respectively. Only ∆DARatio2mm, ∆IIR, and ∆CBI exhibited a statistically significant correlation with ∆CCT (p < 0.05). The changes in all DCR parameters, especially ∆DA and ∆SP-A1 were also correlated with ∆bIOP (p < 0.01)-a 1-mmHg change in bIOP was associated, on average, with 5.612 and -0.037 units of change in SP-A1 and DA, respectively. In contrast, the weakest correlation with ∆bIOP was exhibited by ∆SSI. Conclusion: Most corneal DCR parameters, provided by the Corvis ST, were correlated with IOP, and more weakly with CCT. Changes experienced in CCT and IOP should therefore be considered in studies on corneal biomechanics and how it is affected by disease progression and surgical or medical procedures.

A new approach for quantifying epithelial and stromal thickness changes after orthokeratology contact lens wear.

The aim of the study was to develop an automatic segmentation approach to optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and to investigate the changes in epithelial and stromal thickness profile and radius of curvature after the use of orthokeratology (Ortho-K) contact lenses. A total of 45 right eyes from 52 participants were monitored before, and after one month of, uninterrupted overnight Ortho-K lens wear. The tomography of their right eyes was obtained using optical OCT and rotating Scheimpflug imaging (OCULUS Pentacam). A custom-built MATLAB code for automatic segmentation of corneal OCT images was created and used to assess changes in epithelial thickness, stromal thickness, corneal and stromal profiles and radii of curvature before, and after one month of, uninterrupted overnight wear of Ortho-K lenses. In the central area (0-2 mm diameter), the epithelium thinned by 12.8 ± 6.0 µm (23.8% on average, p < 0.01) after one month of Ortho-K lens wear. In the paracentral area (2-5 mm diameter), the epithelium thinned nasally and temporally (by 2.4 ± 5.9 µm, 4.5% on average, p = 0.031). The stroma thickness increased in the central area (by 4.8 ± 16.1 µm, p = 0.005). The radius of curvature of the central corneal anterior surface increased by 0.24 ± 0.26 mm (3.1%, p < 0.01) along the horizontal meridian and by 0.34 ± 0.18 mm (4.2%, p < 0.01) along the vertical meridian. There were no significant changes in the anterior and posterior stromal radius of curvature. This study introduced a new method to automatically detect the anterior corneal surface, the epithelial posterior surface and the posterior corneal surface in OCT scans. Overnight wear of Ortho-K lenses caused thinning of the central corneal epithelium. The anterior corneal surface became flattered while the anterior and posterior surfaces of the stroma did not undergo significant changes. The results are consistent with the changes reported in previous studies. The reduction in myopic refractive error caused by Ortho-K lens wear was mainly due to changes in corneal epithelium thickness profile.