Cardiac rehabilitation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary disease: a comparative study.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Diabetic patients have a 2-4 times higher risk of cardiovascular disease than non-diabetic individuals. The aims of this study are to evaluate the effects of a cardiac rehabilitation program (phase II) in patients with diabetes and coronary disease and to compare the results with regard to control of cardiovascular risk factors and improvement in functional capacity with coronary patients without diabetes. METHODS: This was a prospective study of patients diagnosed with ischemic heart disease referred for a cardiac rehabilitation program between January 2009 and June 2013. The population was divided into two groups: diabetic and non-diabetic. Patients were assessed at the beginning of phase II and three months later and the following parameters were recorded: body mass index, waist circumference, lipid profile, blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin in diabetic patients, blood pressure, smoking, physical activity level (using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire) and functional capacity (on treadmill stress testing). RESULTS: The study population consisted of 682 patients (253 diabetic and 429 non-diabetic). Diabetic patients were significantly older, had a worse cardiovascular risk profile (higher prevalence of overweight, dyslipidemia, hypertension and sedentary lifestyle) and lower functional capacity. At the end of phase II, there was a statistically significant improvement (p<0.05) in all risk factors and functional capacity, which was similar in both groups, except for body mass index, triglycerides and functional capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients may benefit from a cardiac rehabilitation program and achieve comparable results to non-diabetic patients.

The benefits of cardiac rehabilitation in coronary heart disease: a gender issue?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of death in women worldwide and several studies have shown that they are under-represented in cardiac rehabilitation therapy. The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of women in a cardiac rehabilitation program and to assess their response to this intervention. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 858 patients who attended an exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program after an acute coronary syndrome or elective percutaneous coronary intervention, between January 2008 and December 2012. The patients were analyzed by gender, and the impact of the intervention on cardiovascular risk factors and NT-proBNP was studied. In a subgroup of 386 patients the impact on functional capacity, resting heart rate, chronotropic index and heart rate recovery was also analyzed. RESULTS: Only 24% of the 858 patients who attended the program were women. Women showed statistically significant improvements in all cardiovascular risk factors, NT-proBNP, functional capacity and heart rate recovery (p<0.05) after the program. There were also improvements in resting heart rate and chronotropic index, but these were not statistically significant (p=0.08 and p=0.40, respectively) and when the improvements in these two parameters were compared between genders, there was no statistically significant difference (p=0.33 and p=0.17, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Only 24% of the patients attending the program were women. We found that they benefited from cardiac rehabilitation therapy, with significant improvements in cardiovascular risk factors and in most of the prognostic markers studied.

[Long-term effects of a cardiac rehabilitation program in the control of cardiovascular risk factors]. / Efeitos a longo prazo de um programa de reabilitação cardíaca no controlo dos fatores de risco cardiovasculares.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac rehabilitation programs are designed to improve patients' functional capacity, as well as to educate them and to monitor their cardiovascular risk factors. AIM: The study aims to evaluate the effects of cardiac rehabilitation programs in patients with coronary disease over a 12-month follow-up period with regard to control of cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: This was a prospective study of patients diagnosed with coronary disease who completed an exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program between January 2008 and December 2009 and who were not lost to follow-up. Patients were evaluated at an early stage (first medical consultation in phase II of the program) and 3, 6 and 12 months later, the following parameters being assessed: weight and body mass index, waist circumference, lipid profile, HbA1c in diabetic patients, blood pressure, smoking status and physical activity (using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire). RESULTS: In the sample of 256 patients (76.2% male, mean age 67 years), dyslipidemia proved to be the most prevalent risk factor (74.2%), followed by overweight (71.5%). There was a statistically significant improvement (p<0,05) in all risk factors studied at the end of phase II of the program, which was maintained at 6 and 12 months of follow-up, with the exception of body mass index (loss of statistical significance at 6-month assessment, p=0,92). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the need for cardiac rehabilitation programs in the context of secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and the importance of implementing strategies that promote long-term maintenance of their benefits.