Second messenger signalling bypasses CGRP receptor blockade to provoke migraine attacks in humans.

There are several endogenous molecules that can trigger migraine attacks when administered to humans. Notably, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has been identified as a key player in a signalling cascade involved in migraine attacks, acting through the second messenger cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in various cells, including intracranial vascular smooth muscle cells. However, it remains unclear whether intracellular cAMP signalling requires CGRP receptor activation during a migraine attack in humans. To address this question, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel trial using a human provocation model involving the administration of CGRP and cilostazol in individuals with migraine pretreated with erenumab or placebo. Our study revealed that migraine attacks can be provoked in patients by cAMP-mediated mechanisms using cilostazol, even when the CGRP receptor is blocked by erenumab. Furthermore, the dilation of cranial arteries induced by cilostazol was not influenced by the CGRP receptor blockade. These findings provide clinical evidence that cAMP-evoked migraine attacks do not require CGRP receptor activation. This discovery opens up new possibilities for the development of mechanism-based drugs for the treatment of migraine.

Rationale for the selection of dual primary endpoints in prevention studies of cognitively unimpaired individuals at genetic risk for developing symptoms of Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: There is a critical need for novel primary endpoints designed to detect early and subtle changes in cognition in clinical trials targeting the asymptomatic (preclinical) phase of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The Alzheimer's Prevention Initiative (API) Generation Program, conducted in cognitively unimpaired individuals at risk of developing AD (e.g., enriched by the apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype), used a novel dual primary endpoints approach, whereby demonstration of treatment effect in one of the two endpoints is sufficient for trial success. The two primary endpoints were (1) time to event (TTE)-with an event defined as a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD and/or dementia due to AD-and (2) change from baseline to month 60 in the API Preclinical Composite Cognitive (APCC) test score. METHODS: Historical observational data from three sources were used to fit models to describe the TTE and the longitudinal APCC decline, both in people who do and do not progress to MCI or dementia due to AD. Clinical endpoints were simulated based on the TTE and APCC models to assess the performance of the dual endpoints versus each of the two single endpoints, with the selected treatment effect ranging from a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 (40% risk reduction) to 1 (no effect). RESULTS: A Weibull model was selected for TTE, and power and linear models were selected to describe the APCC score for progressors and non-progressors, respectively. Derived effect sizes in terms of reduction of the APCC change from baseline to year 5 were low (0.186 for HR = 0.67). The power for the APCC alone was consistently lower compared to the power of TTE alone (58% [APCC] vs 84% [TTE] for HR = 0.67). Also, the overall power was higher for the 80%/20% distribution (82%) of the family-wise type 1 error rate (alpha) between TTE and APCC compared to 20%/80% (74%). CONCLUSIONS: Dual endpoints including TTE and a measure of cognitive decline perform better than the cognitive decline measure as a single primary endpoint in a cognitively unimpaired population at risk of AD (based on the APOE genotype). Clinical trials in this population, however, need to be large, include older age, and have a long follow-up period of at least 5 years to be able to detect treatment effects.

Plasma Levels of CGRP During a 2-h Infusion of VIP in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Migraine: An Exploratory Study.

Introduction: The activation of perivascular fibers and the consequent release of vasoactive peptides, including the vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), play a role in migraine pathogenesis. A 2-h infusion of VIP provoked migraine, but the mechanisms remain unknown. We investigated whether 2-h infusion of VIP caused alterations in plasma levels of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and whether any changes might be related to the induced migraine attacks. Materials and Methods: We enrolled individuals with episodic migraine without aura and healthy participants to randomly receive a 2-h infusion of either VIP (8 pmol/kg/min) or placebo (sterile saline) in two randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trials. We collected clinical data and measured plasma levels of VIP and CGRP at fixed time points: at baseline (T0) and every 30 min until 180 min (T180) after the start of the infusion. Results: Blood samples were collected from patients with migraine (n = 19) and healthy individuals (n = 12). During VIP infusion, mixed effects analysis revealed a significant increase in plasma CGRP (p = 0.027) at T30 (vs. T180, adjusted p-value = 0.039) and T60 (vs. T180, adjusted p-value = 0.027) in patients with migraine. We found no increase in plasma CGRP during VIP-induced migraine attacks (p = 0.219). In healthy individuals, there was no increase in plasma CGRP during VIP (p = 0.205) or placebo (p = 0.428) days. Discussion: Plasma CGRP was elevated in patients with migraine during a prolonged infusion of VIP, but these alterations were not associated with VIP-induced migraine attacks. Given the exploratory design of our study, further investigations are needed to clarify the role of CGRP in VIP-induced migraine. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03989817 and NCT04260035.

Two-hour infusion of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide induces delayed headache and extracranial vasodilation in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptides (PACAPs) have gained special interest in headache science. VIP and PACAPs (two isoforms, PACAP27 and PACAP38) are related in structure and function, as are their receptors, but they show differences in vasodilating- and headache-inducing properties. Intravenous infusion of PACAP27 or PACAP38, but not VIP, induces a long-lasting dilation of cranial arteries and delayed headache. The relationship between the long-lasting cranial vasodilation and headache development is not fully clarified. METHODS: In a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study in 12 healthy volunteers, diameter changes of cranial arteries, occurrence of headache and the parasympathetic system were examined before, during and after a 2-hour continuous intravenous infusion of VIP and placebo. Primary endpoints were the differences in area under the curve for the superficial temporal artery diameter and headache intensity scores, as well as in headache incidence, between VIP and placebo. RESULTS: The superficial temporal artery diameter was significantly larger on the VIP day compared to placebo (p < 0.001) and the dilation lasted for more than 2 h. The incidence of headache was higher (p = 0.003) on the VIP day compared to the placebo day. The difference in headache intensity scores was more evident in the post-infusion period (120-200 min, p = 0.034) and in the post-hospital phase (4-12 h, p = 0.025). Cranial parasympathetic activity, measured through the production of tears, was higher during VIP compared to placebo (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Continuous intravenous infusion of VIP over 2 h induced a long-lasting cranial vasodilation, activation of the cranial parasympathetic system, and delayed mild headaches in healthy volunteers.Trial Registration: The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03989817).

[Treatment of the patient with castration-resistant biochemical progression of prostate cancer]. / Tratamiento del paciente con carcinoma de próstata en progresión bioquímica resistente a castración.

Castration resistant prostatic carcinoma (CRPC) is defined as tumor progression despite an effective castration (serum testosterone levels < 50 ng/dL). Biochemical progression requires at least two successive increases from the previous lowest value of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) spaced at least a week, and with a minimum value of 2 ng/mL. In patients receiving complete androgen blockade, antiandrogen should be discontinued prior to diagnosis of CRPC. CPRC is a heterogeneous entity. Baseline PSA and PSA velocity seem to be the most important prognostic factors in patients with biochemical relapse as the only manifestation of CRPC. Some of these patients can be followed without treatment until disease progression. Because of a large proportion of tumors progressing under androgen deprivation therapy remain hormone-dependent, the use of other hormonal therapies has been the preferred treatment for the majority of these patients. Besides inhibitors of adrenal steroidogenesis, other novel hormonal approaches are currently under investigation to avoid the effect of the activated androgenic receptor on the tumor cell. In recent years there has been an important development of immunotherapy, which has demonstrated to increase survival in CRPC oligosymptomatic patients. First and second line chemotherapy in CRPC are associated with an increase in overall survival, but they are usually recommended for patients with metastases. Until the results of ongoing trials are available, the type and timing of the treatment for patients with CRPC and biochemical recurrence should be individualized.