Echocardiographic changes with non-invasive ventilation and CPAP in obesity hypoventilation syndrome.

RATIONALE: Despite a significant association between obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) and cardiac dysfunction, no randomised trials have assessed the impact of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or CPAP on cardiac structure and function assessed by echocardiography. OBJECTIVES: We performed a secondary analysis of the data from the largest multicentre randomised controlled trial of OHS (Pickwick project, n=221) to determine the comparative efficacy of 2 months of NIV (n=71), CPAP (n=80) and lifestyle modification (control group, n=70) on structural and functional echocardiographic changes. METHODS: Conventional transthoracic two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiograms were obtained at baseline and after 2 months. Echocardiographers at each site were blinded to the treatment arms. Statistical analysis was performed using intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: At baseline, 55% of patients had pulmonary hypertension and 51% had evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy. Treatment with NIV, but not CPAP, lowered systolic pulmonary artery pressure (-3.4 mm Hg, 95% CI -5.3 to -1.5; adjusted P=0.025 vs control and P=0.033 vs CPAP). The degree of improvement in systolic pulmonary artery pressure was greater in patients treated with NIV who had pulmonary hypertension at baseline (-6.4 mm Hg, 95% CI -9 to -3.8). Only NIV therapy decreased left ventricular hypertrophy with a significant reduction in left ventricular mass index (-5.7 g/m2; 95% CI -11.0 to -4.4). After adjusted analysis, NIV was superior to control group in improving left ventricular mass index (P=0.015). Only treatment with NIV led to a significant improvement in 6 min walk distance (32 m; 95% CI 19 to 46). CONCLUSION: In patients with OHS, medium-term treatment with NIV is more effective than CPAP and lifestyle modification in improving pulmonary hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy and functional outcomes. Long-term studies are needed to confirm these results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Pre-results, NCT01405976 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/).

The Effect of Supplemental Oxygen in Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Low flow supplemental oxygen is commonly prescribed to patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS). However, there is a paucity of data regarding its efficacy and safety. The objective of this study was to assess the medium-term treatment efficacy of adding supplemental oxygen therapy to commonly prescribed treatment modalities in OHS. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of a previous randomized controlled trial, we studied 302 sequentially screened OHS patients who were randomly assigned to noninvasive ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure, or lifestyle modification. Outcomes at 2 mo included arterial blood gases, symptoms, quality of life, blood pressure, polysomnography, spirometry, 6-min walk distance, and hospital resource utilization. Statistical analysis comparing patients with and without oxygen therapy in the three treatment groups was performed using an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: In the noninvasive ventilation group, supplemental oxygen reduced systolic blood pressure although this could be also explained by a reduction in body weight experienced in this group. In the continuous positive airway pressure group, supplemental oxygen increased the frequency of morning confusion. In the lifestyle modification group, supplemental oxygen increased compensatory metabolic alkalosis and decreased the apnea-hypopnea index during sleep. Oxygen therapy was not associated with an increase in hospital resource utilization in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: After 2 mo of follow-up, chronic oxygen therapy produced marginal changes that were insufficient to consider it, globally, as beneficial or deleterious. Because supplemental oxygen therapy did not increase hospital resource utilization, we recommend prescribing oxygen therapy to patients with OHS who meet criteria with close monitoring. Long-term studies examining outcomes such as incident cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are necessary. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrial.gov, ID: NCT01405976.

Eficacia a medio y largo plazo de la ventilación no invasiva en el síndrome de hipoventilación-obesidad (estudio Pickwick) / Mid- and Long-Term Efficacy of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome: The Pickwick's Study

El proyecto Pickwick es un estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado, abierto y controlado con grupos en paralelo que intenta dar respuesta a los interrogantes del síndrome de hipoventilación-obesidad (SHO), una enfermedad creciente en los países desarrollados. Para ello, pacientes con SHO fueron divididos en pacientes con índice de apneas-hipoapneas (IAH) ≥30 y <30 mediante polisomnografía. El grupo con IAH≥30 se aleatorizó a tratamiento mediante estilo de vida saludable, ventilación no invasiva (VNI) o presión en la vía aérea positiva continua (CPAP). El grupo con IAH<30, a VNI o estilo de vida saludable. Su objetivo ha sido evaluar la eficacia del tratamiento con ventilación VNI, CPAP y estilo de vida saludable (control) a medio y largo plazo en el SHO, analizando como variable primaria la PaCO2 y los días de hospitalización, respectivamente, y como variables operativas el porcentaje de abandonos por razones médicas y mortalidad. Los objetivos secundarios a medio plazo fueron: 1) evaluar la eficacia clínica-funcional, en calidad de vida, en variables polisomnográficas y ecocardiográficas; 2) investigar la importancia de los episodios apneicos y de la leptina en la génesis de la hipoventilación alveolar diurna y el cambio con los diferentes tratamientos; 3) investigar si las alteraciones metabólicas, bioquímicas y disfunción endotelial vascular dependen de la presencia de apneas e hipoapneas, y 4) cambio de marcadores inflamatorios y de daño endotelial con los tratamientos. Los objetivos secundarios a largo plazo fueron: 1) evaluar la eficacia clínico-funcional y en calidad de vida con VNI y CPAP; 2) cambio de la leptina, marcadores inflamatorios y de daño endotelial con los tratamientos; 3) cambio de la hipertensión pulmonar y otras variables ecocardiográficas, así como en la hipertensión arterial e incidencia de episodios cardiovasculares, y 4) frecuencia de abandonos y mortalidad

The Pickwick project was a prospective, randomized and controlled study, which addressed the issue of obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), a growing problem in developed countries. OHS patients were divided according to apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 30 and < 30 determined by polysomnography. The group with AHI ≥ 30 was randomized to intervention with lifestyle changes, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP); the group with AHI < 30 received NIV or lifestyle changes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of NIV treatment, CPAP and lifestyle changes (control) in the medium and long-term management of patients with OHS. The primary variables were PaCO2 and days of hospitalization, and operating variables were the percentage of dropouts for medical reasons and mortality. Secondary medium-term objectives were: (I) to evaluate clinical-functional effectiveness on quality of life, echocardiographic and polysomnographic variables; (II) to investigate the importance of apneic events and leptin in the pathogenesis of daytime alveolar hypoventilation and change according to the different treatments; (III) to investigate whether metabolic, biochemical and vascular endothelial dysfunction disorders depend on the presence of apneas and hypopneasm and (IV) changes in inflammatory markers and endothelial damage according to treatment. Secondary long-term objectives were to evaluate: (I) clinical and functional effectiveness and quality of life with NIV and CPAP; (II) changes in leptin, inflammatory markers and endothelial damage according to treatment; (III) changes in pulmonary hypertension and other echocardiographic variables, as well as blood pressure and incidence of cardiovascular events, and (IV) dropout rate and mortality

Mid- and Long-Term Efficacy of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome: The Pickwick's Study.

The Pickwick project was a prospective, randomized and controlled study, which addressed the issue of obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), a growing problem in developed countries. OHS patients were divided according to apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥30 and <30 determined by polysomnography. The group with AHI≥30 was randomized to intervention with lifestyle changes, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP); the group with AHI<30 received NIV or lifestyle changes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of NIV treatment, CPAP and lifestyle changes (control) in the medium and long-term management of patients with OHS. The primary variables were PaCO2 and days of hospitalization, and operating variables were the percentage of dropouts for medical reasons and mortality. Secondary medium-term objectives were: (i)to evaluate clinical-functional effectiveness on quality of life, echocardiographic and polysomnographic variables; (ii)to investigate the importance of apneic events and leptin in the pathogenesis of daytime alveolar hypoventilation and change according to the different treatments; (ii)to investigate whether metabolic, biochemical and vascular endothelial dysfunction disorders depend on the presence of apneas and hypopneasm and (iv)changes in inflammatory markers and endothelial damage according to treatment. Secondary long-term objectives were to evaluate: (i)clinical and functional effectiveness and quality of life with NIV and CPAP; (ii)changes in leptin, inflammatory markers and endothelial damage according to treatment; (iii)changes in pulmonary hypertension and other echocardiographic variables, as well as blood pressure and incidence of cardiovascular events, and (iv)dropout rate and mortality.

Efficacy of Different Treatment Alternatives for Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome. Pickwick Study.

RATIONALE: The incidence of obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) may be increasing in parallel with the present obesity epidemic. Despite extensive noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use in patients with OHS, information regarding efficacy is limited. OBJECTIVES: We performed a large, multicenter randomized controlled study to determine the comparative efficacy of NIV, CPAP, and lifestyle modification (control group) using daytime PaCO2 as the main outcome measure. METHODS: Sequentially screened patients with OHS with severe sleep apnea were randomized into the above-mentioned groups for a 2-month follow up. Arterial blood gas parameters, clinical symptoms, health-related quality-of-life assessments, polysomnography, spirometry, 6-minute-walk distance, dropouts, compliance, and side effects were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using intention-to-treat analysis, although adjustments for CPAP and NIV compliance were also analyzed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In total, 351 patients were selected, and 221 were randomized. NIV yielded the greatest improvement in PaCO2 and bicarbonate, with significant differences relative to the control group but not relative to the CPAP group. In the CPAP group, PaCO2 improvement was significantly different than in the control group only after CPAP compliance adjustment. Additionally, clinical symptoms and polysomnographic parameters improved similarly with NIV and CPAP relative to the control. However, some health-related quality-of-life assessments, the spirometry, and 6-minute-walk distance results improved more with NIV than with CPAP. Dropouts were similar between groups, and compliance and secondary effects were similar between NIV and CPAP. CONCLUSIONS: NIV and CPAP were more effective than lifestyle modification in improving clinical symptoms and polysomnographic parameters, although NIV yielded better respiratory functional improvements than did CPAP. Long-term studies must demonstrate whether this functional improvement has relevant implications. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01405976).