Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 106(4): 630-7, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11031332

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intranasal glucocorticoids are effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Their effectiveness as an anti-inflammatory adjunct in the treatment of acute recurrent sinusitis has not been adequately established in a controlled clinical study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that intranasal corticosteroid treatment produces additional relief in the treatment of acute sinusitis with oral antibiotics. METHODS: Patients who were 12 years old and older with a history of recurrent sinusitis were treated while experiencing a new episode of acute sinusitis, which was diagnosed by symptoms and confirmed by computed tomography scan of the paranasal sinuses. Patients were treated for 21 days with amoxicillin clavulanate potassium and randomized to receive concurrent mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS; Nasonex [400 microg, twice daily]; n = 200 patients) or placebo spray (twice daily; n = 207 patients). Symptom scores for headache, facial pain, congestion, purulent rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, and cough were recorded at baseline and throughout treatment. RESULTS: Baseline symptom scores showed a moderate level of symptom severity comparable in both groups. Patient-recorded twice daily symptom scores showed that adjunctive treatment with MFNS caused a significantly greater decrease in total symptom score (primary efficacy variable) and in individual scores of inflammatory symptoms associated with the obstruction process (headache, congestion, and facial pain) compared with placebo. Symptoms associated with the secretory processes were improved to a lesser degree. Therapy-related local adverse events were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: The addition of intranasal corticosteroid, MFNS 400 microg twice daily, to antibiotics significantly reduces symptoms of acute sinusitis compared with antibiotic treatment alone.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacokinetics , Pregnadienediols/administration & dosage , Pregnadienediols/pharmacokinetics , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Administration, Inhalation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mometasone Furoate , Nasal Mucosa/drug effects , Therapeutic Equivalency
2.
Am J Ther ; 5(4): 245-51, 1998 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10099066

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of Claritin-D 24 Hour (once daily) with that of Claritin-D 12 Hour (twice daily) and placebo in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 469 patients with moderate-to-severe SAR symptoms were treated for 2 weeks with one of the following: Claritin-D 24 Hour (a combination tablet formulation of loratadine 10 mg in the coating and pseudoephedrine sulfate 240 mg in an extended-release core), Claritin-D 12 Hour (a combination tablet formulation of loratadine 5 mg in the tablet coating and 120 mg pseudoephedrine sulfate, 60 mg in the coating and 60 mg in the core), or placebo. Claritin-D 24 Hour and Claritin-D 12 Hour were consistently superior to placebo (P < 0.01) in reducing total, nasal, and nonnasal symptom scores. Patients in the Claritin-D 24 Hour and Claritin-D 12 Hour groups also had significantly greater (P

Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents/administration & dosage , Ephedrine/administration & dosage , Loratadine/administration & dosage , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Anti-Allergic Agents/adverse effects , Child , Delayed-Action Preparations , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Combinations , Ephedrine/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Loratadine/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Tablets , Treatment Outcome , United States , Vasoconstrictor Agents/adverse effects
3.
Chest ; 112(1): 34-9, 1997 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9228354

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a double-strength formulation of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP 84) metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with that of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP 42) MDI in the treatment of chronic asthma. DESIGN: A 28-day, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. SETTING: Outpatient. PATIENTS: A total of 423 patients aged 12 to 65 years (mean range, 34 to 36 years) with moderate asthma (FEV1, 50 to 80% of predicted) who required long-term inhaled corticosteroids were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive BDP 84, two oral inhalations bid (336 microg/d), BDP 42, four oral inhalations bid (336 microg/d), or placebo. A fourth treatment arm administering BDP 84, eight oral inhalations bid (HD BDP 84; 1,344 microg/d) was also included to determine whether a dose-response relationship could be demonstrated. MEASUREMENTS: Spirometry, clinical observations. RESULTS: The three active treatments were significantly more effective (p < or = 0.01) than placebo at all time points in improving FEV1, the primary efficacy parameter; BDP 42 and BDP 84 were comparable to each other at every time point. Secondary pulmonary function tests (FVC, forced expiratory flow at 25 to 75% of FVC, and peak expiratory flow rate) showed similar results. All three active treatments were well tolerated. A dose response between 336 microg/d and 1,344 microg/d was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: In this well-controlled 28-day study, BDP 42 and BDP 84 were shown to be comparable in efficacy and safety on a microgram-for-microgram basis.


Subject(s)
Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Asthma/drug therapy , Beclomethasone/administration & dosage , Administration, Inhalation , Adult , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Beclomethasone/adverse effects , Beclomethasone/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Time Factors
4.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 98(2): 302-8, 1996 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8757207

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of intranasally administered corticosteroid sprays is an established treatment option for seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 438 patients with moderate to severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis were treated for 4 weeks with double-strength beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) aqueous nasal spray (84 micrograms/spray: BDP-ds), once daily; regular-strength BDP (42 micrograms/spray: BDP-rs), twice daily; high-strength BDP (336 micrograms/spray: BDP-hs), once daily; or placebo. BDP-hs was included as a safety comparison group. All treatments were given as two sprays per nostril. RESULTS: Physician-rated nasal symptom scores were significantly improved in all three active treatment groups compared with those of the placebo group within the initial 3 days of treatment. Improvement was maintained throughout the 4-week treatment period. BDP-ds and BDP-rs were equivalent at all time points. The BDP-ds, BDP-rs, and BDP-hs groups had greater numbers of patients with a good or excellent therapeutic response at end point than the placebo group. All treatments were well-tolerated, and no unexpected adverse events were reported. No effects on laboratory evaluations or vital signs were evident for any treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that BDP-ds given once a day and BDP-rs given twice a day in the same total daily dose are comparably safe and effective in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.


Subject(s)
Beclomethasone/therapeutic use , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Administration, Intranasal , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Beclomethasone/administration & dosage , Beclomethasone/adverse effects , Child , Chlorpheniramine/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Patient Satisfaction , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/physiopathology , Solutions
5.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 76(5): 462-8, 1996 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8630721

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Albuterol sulfate, in the syrup and tablet form for oral administration, has been an effective treatment for adults and children with bronchial asthma. Extended-release albuterol sulfate tablets (Proventil Repetabs, Schering Corp.) provide a convenient, twice-daily dosing regimen, but are indicated only for patients > or = 12 years of age. OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine whether patients 6 to 12 years of age could be effectively and safely treated with extended-release albuterol tablets. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study of 157 patients in five centers. Patients were randomized to 4 weeks' treatment with extended-release albuterol tablets, 4 mg twice daily (q 12h), increasing up to 12 mg q 12h, or placebo. Efficacy was evaluated based on pulmonary function tests (PFTs), physician and patient evaluations, and data collected from patients' diaries on PEFR, asthma symptoms, number of nighttime awakenings, and number of tablets taken. The primary efficacy parameter was area under the curve (AUC) for FEV1, evaluated for 8 to 12 hours post-dosing. Safety was evaluated based on vital signs, electrocardiograms, and adverse events. RESULTS: Mean AUCs for FEV1 were significantly greater in the albuterol group at days 1 and 8 (P < or = .03). The albuterol group showed consistently lower severity scores for asthma symptoms. Physicians' and patients' global evaluations favored the albuterol group over the placebo group. No serious, treatment-related adverse events were reported. There were no clinically meaningful changes from baseline in either treatment group for vital signs or electrocardiograms. CONCLUSIONS: Extended-release albuterol tablets (4 mg), administered to children 6 to 12 years old in divided doses of up to 24 mg/day, improved pulmonary function and asthmatic symptoms and were well tolerated.


Subject(s)
Albuterol/administration & dosage , Albuterol/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Adolescent , Albuterol/adverse effects , Asthma/physiopathology , Child , Delayed-Action Preparations , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Respiratory Function Tests
6.
J Asthma ; 32(4): 275-84, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7629003

ABSTRACT

This multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded, parallel group study compared the effects of converting patients from a q12h extended-release theophylline preparation (Theo-Dur) to a q24h extended-release product (Uni-Dur). Patients (n = 133) first received open-label Theo-Dur treatment with dosage titrated to achieve peak serum theophylline concentrations of 10-20 micrograms/ml. Patients then were randomized to continue Theo-Dur (n = 64) or to convert to Uni-Dur (n = 60) with peak serum theophylline concentrations maintained in the desired range. Pulmonary function tests were performed during the open-label and blinded periods; patients maintained diaries and performed peak flow measurements before each dose of study treatment. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. Respiratory status during blinded treatment was rated as the same or improved compared with open-label treatment by > 87% of evaluable patients and physicians, regardless of treatment group. There were no significant differences in mean peak serum theophylline concentrations at baseline, at the final evaluation, or at any point during the study. Few dosage adjustments were necessary (5/52, Uni-Dur; 9/57, Theo-Dur). There were no significant changes in pulmonary function test results or patient diary entries between the open-label and blinded periods. Headache and nausea were the most commonly reported adverse events. In conclusion, converting patients from twice- to once-daily theophylline treatment resulted in no significant changes in any measures of pulmonary function, and there were no significant differences between the groups during the blinded treatment period.


Subject(s)
Asthma/drug therapy , Bronchitis/drug therapy , Pulmonary Emphysema/drug therapy , Theophylline/administration & dosage , Adult , Bronchial Provocation Tests , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Delayed-Action Preparations , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Respiratory Function Tests , Theophylline/adverse effects , Theophylline/blood
7.
South Med J ; 82(6): 715-8, 1989 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2499934

ABSTRACT

In a prospective multicenter clinical trial, 69 patients with Pseudomonas infections were treated with netilmicin sulfate as the only antipseudomonal antibiotic. Clinical resolution or improvement was observed for 81% of the infections, whereas 19% were considered treatment failures. The bacteriologic response, based on follow-up culture results, showed elimination of Pseudomonas from 62% of the infection sites, with persistence in 30%. All isolates were susceptible by disk susceptibility testing (zone greater than or equal to 15 mm), and by microdilution testing in unsupplemented broth. The majority of isolates, however, were resistant in cation supplemented media. The clinical failures could be accounted for by factors other than netilmicin failure. In conclusion, netilmicin appeared effective as treatment for netilmicin-susceptible Pseudomonas infections in nonneutropenic adults. A low incidence of nephrotoxicity (12%) occurred despite careful monitoring of serum levels.


Subject(s)
Netilmicin/therapeutic use , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Evaluation , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Netilmicin/administration & dosage , Netilmicin/adverse effects , Netilmicin/pharmacology , Prospective Studies , Pseudomonas Infections/blood , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/pathogenicity , Retrospective Studies , South America , United States
8.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 23(5): 773-83, 1989 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2668247

ABSTRACT

This multicentric, randomized, double-blind trial compared the efficacy and safety of netilmicin, 4.5 mg/kg od and 1.5 mg/kg tid, in patients with intra-abdominal infections. Of 114 patients enrolled, 57 patients (mean age 40.3 years) in the od group and 55 (mean age 36.8 years) in the tid group were evaluated for efficacy; 58 and 56 patients in corresponding groups were evaluated for safety. Among those evaluated for efficacy were 12 od-treated and 11 tid-treated patients with documented septicaemia, and 32 and 30 patients of respective groups with polymicrobial infections. Initially, 86 and 81 netilmicin-susceptible causative microorganisms were isolated in corresponding groups. Of these pathogens, 55% in the od group and 62% in the tid group were Escherichia coli. Daily dosage of netilmicin ranged from 3.70 to 4.71 mg/kg (mean 4.50) for the od group and from 3.06 to 4.76 mg/kg (mean 4.46) for the tid group. Duration of netilmicin therapy ranged from six to 13 days (mean 8.7 days) for od-treated patients and from seven to 16 days (mean 8.8 days) for tid-treated patients. Concomitant metronidazole was administered to 41 patients of the od group and 34 of the tid group; one patient in the tid group received clindamycin. Clinical and bacteriological responses were assessed, and peak and trough serum netilmicin levels were measured periodically, during therapy. Laboratory tests, including determinations of serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen values, were performed throughout the trial. A clinical cure was achieved in 57/57 od-treated patients and 54/55 tid-treated patients; treatment failed in one tid-treated patient (1/55). In od and tid groups, 86/86 and 80/81 netilmicin-susceptible pathogens initially isolated were considered to be eliminated, respectively; one isolate (Esch. coli) persisted in the tid group. Mean peak serum netilmicin concentration in the od group was approximately two-fold greater than that in the tid group; mean trough serum netilmicin concentrations were similar for the two groups. Adverse reactions were limited to mild pain at the site of netilmicin administration in several patients in each treatment group. Netilmicin od and tid (alone or in combination with metronidazole) were similarly efficacious in the treatment of patients with appendicitis and other intra-abdominal infections caused by netilmicin-susceptible pathogens. Both dosage regimens of netilmicin were safe and well tolerated.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Netilmicin/therapeutic use , Abdomen , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Netilmicin/administration & dosage , Netilmicin/pharmacokinetics , Random Allocation
9.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 31(10): 1514-8, 1987 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3124731

ABSTRACT

In vitro studies were performed with 74 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates which were collected during a multicenter trial. The isolates were obtained from 70 patients who had been treated with netilmicin as the only antipseudomonal antibiotic. Clinically, 83% of the patients were cured or improved, and 64% of the Pseudomonas isolates were eliminated by chemotherapy. The 74 clinical isolates and 38 additional isolates with known mechanisms of aminoglycoside resistance were tested in three separate laboratories by disk diffusion methods and by microdilution tests with three broth media (Mueller-Hinton broth with full, half, and no cation supplements). Isolates that responded to netilmicin therapy and those that failed to respond were all susceptible by the disk test, and most were susceptible by microdilution tests with unsupplemented broth. However, over half of the clinical isolates appeared to be resistant when cations were added to the broth medium. Strains capable of producing enzymes that inactivate netilmicin were resistant by all methods tested. Broth dilution and agar dilution results were most comparable when half of the recommended cation supplements was added to Mueller-Hinton broth. Further consideration should be given to reducing the concentration of cations that are added to Mueller-Hinton broth when netilmicin susceptibility tests are being performed. However, additional studies with other aminoglycosides are needed before appropriate testing conditions can be standardized.


Subject(s)
Cations/pharmacology , Netilmicin/pharmacology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Adult , Amikacin/pharmacology , Female , Gentamicins/pharmacology , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Tobramycin/pharmacology
10.
Arch Intern Med ; 146(12): 2329-34, 1986 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3535719

ABSTRACT

We prospectively compared the efficacy and safety of netilmicin sulfate or tobramycin sulfate in conjunction with piperacillin sodium in 118 immunocompromised patients with presumed severe infections. The two treatment regimens were equally efficacious. Nephrotoxicity occurred in a similar proportion in patients treated with netilmicin and tobramycin (17% vs 11%). Ototoxicity occurred in four (9.5%) of 42 netilmicin and piperacillin and in 12 (22%) of 54 tobramycin and piperacillin-treated patients. Of those evaluated with posttherapy audiograms, three of four netilmicin and piperacillin-treated patients had auditory thresholds return to baseline compared with one of nine tobramycin and piperacillin-treated patients. The number of greater than or equal to 15-dB increases in auditory threshold as a proportion of total greater than or equal to 15-dB changes (increases and decreases) was significantly lower in netilmicin and piperacillin- vs tobramycin and piperacillin-treated patients (18 of 78 vs 67 of 115). We conclude that aminoglycoside-associated ototoxicity was less severe and more often reversible with netilmicin than with tobramycin.


Subject(s)
Infections/drug therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Netilmicin/therapeutic use , Tobramycin/therapeutic use , Adult , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Therapy, Combination , Hearing Loss/chemically induced , Humans , Immune Tolerance , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/immunology , Netilmicin/adverse effects , Piperacillin/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Random Allocation , Tobramycin/adverse effects
11.
Clin Ther ; 7(3): 338-46, 1985.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3922616

ABSTRACT

The effectiveness of netilmicin was evaluated retrospectively in 40 patients with culture-documented bacteremia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Netilmicin was the only antibiotic active in vitro against P aeruginosa that was administered to these patients. In 18 patients, Pseudomonas bacteremia developed in association with a Pseudomonas infection of the urinary tract; in 22 patients, Pseudomonas bacteremia developed from nonurinary or unknown sources. A clinical resolution or improvement was observed in 92% of the evaluable patients, and P aeruginosa was eliminated from the blood of 90% of the patients. The drug had nephrotoxic effects in two patients, but in no patient was there subjective or audiometric evidence of ototoxic effects. Three patients died during therapy. Based on these data, netilmicin is effective, and is associated with a low incidence of toxic effects, in the treatment of patients with Pseudomonas bacteremia.


Subject(s)
Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Netilmicin/therapeutic use , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Sepsis/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netilmicin/adverse effects , Netilmicin/blood , Pseudomonas Infections/mortality , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , Sepsis/mortality
13.
Lancet ; 1(8334): 1123-6, 1983 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6133153

ABSTRACT

254 patients with serious gram-negative bacillary infections were enrolled into a multicentre, randomised, blind clinical trial and treated with tobramycin-ticarcillin or netilmicin-ticarcillin. The two treatment groups were similar as to sex, age, and weight. The mean daily dose of netilmicin (237 mg) was higher than that of tobramycin (211 mg), p less than 0.01, but the mean duration of therapy was longer with tobramycin (9.4 days versus 8.7 days), p less than 0.01. The netilmicin cohort also had more serious underlying diseases, p less than 0.028. Clinical (tobramycin, 93% and netilmicin, 91%) and bacteriological responses (tobramycin, 87% and netilmicin, 89%) were similar. 84 tobramycin and 73 netilmicin patients had serial audiograms. Eighth nerve deficits developed in 10 (12%) tobramycin and two (3%) netilmicin patients, p = 0.037. Drug-related renal dysfunction developed in 5 (4%) of 114 tobramycin patients whose renal function was monitored and in 1 (1%) of 116 netilmicin patients, p = 0.12.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Ear/drug effects , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Kidney/drug effects , Netilmicin/therapeutic use , Tobramycin/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Double-Blind Method , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Female , Humans , Male , Netilmicin/adverse effects , Netilmicin/pharmacology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Random Allocation , Tobramycin/adverse effects , Tobramycin/pharmacology , Vestibulocochlear Nerve/drug effects
14.
Clin Ther ; 5(5): 515-24, 1983.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6352035

ABSTRACT

A double-blind, randomized study of gentamicin and netilmicin, each in combination with cefoxitin, was done to compare their respective efficacy and toxicity in patients with serious systemic infection. Thirty-seven surgical patients were evaluated for efficacy and 46 patients were evaluated for toxicity. The most frequently cultured organisms were Escherichia coli (15), Klebsiella sp (9), Proteus sp (6), and Bacteroides sp (4). For 23 patients treated with gentamicin-cefoxitin (G-C), the clinical response was favorable in 20/21 (95.2%) evaluable cases, and elimination or marked reduction of 33/34 (97.1%) organisms was achieved. For 14 patients treated with netilmicin-cefoxitin (N-C), the clinical response was favorable in 13/13 (100%) evaluable cases, and 19/20 (95%) organisms were eliminated or markedly reduced. Nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase in serum creatinine to greater than 25% over baseline with an absolute rise of at least 0.5 mg/100 ml to a value greater than or equal to 1.3 mg/100 ml. Based on these criteria, nephrotoxicity was seen in 2/27 (7.4%) patients treated with G-C and in 3/19 (15.8%) patients treated with N-C. Ototoxicity was defined as a greater than 20 dB loss at any frequency. Based on these criteria, ototoxicity was seen in 5/27 (18.5%) patients treated with G-C and 2/19 (10.5%) patients treated with N-C. The data show no significant difference in toxicity and suggest that netilmicin and gentamicin are both highly effective in combination with cefoxitin in patients who have serious infections after surgery.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Cefoxitin/administration & dosage , Gentamicins/administration & dosage , Netilmicin/administration & dosage , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bacteroides Infections/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/drug therapy , Female , Hearing/drug effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Random Allocation , Vestibular Function Tests
15.
Clin Ther ; 6(1): 94-102, 1983.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6370440

ABSTRACT

A total of 804 pediatric patients (572 neonates and 232 infants and children) with suspected or documented serious infections were enrolled in a multicenter open study of netilmicin, a new semisynthetic aminoglycoside. All patients were evaluable for safety; 161 (20%) had bacteriologically documented infections and were thus evaluable for efficacy. Clinical success was seen in 94.4% (169/179) and bacteriological success in 91.1% (163/179) of sites; clinical success was seen in 94% (205/218) and bacteriological success was seen in 90.3% (196/217) of organisms. No significant adverse renal function changes were seen, and only one instance of an eighth nerve problem, probably related to netilmicin therapy, was encountered.


Subject(s)
Aminoglycosides/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gentamicins/administration & dosage , Netilmicin/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Aminoglycosides/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Trials as Topic , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infusions, Parenteral , Injections, Intramuscular , Male
16.
Arzneimittelforschung ; 31(2): 366-70, 1981.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7194655

ABSTRACT

Netilmicin and gentamicin were compared in a multicenter clinical trial in 12 study locations. The two aminoglycosides were randomly assigned to hospitalized adult patients with systemic infections, and were administered by i.m. injection or slow i.v. infusion in divided doses generally calculated to deliver either 4-6.5 mg/kg per day of netilmicin, or 3-5 mg/kg per day of gentamicin. Lower dosages were given to patients with impaired renal function. Data from 210 patients receiving netilmicin and 212 receiving gentamicin were analyzed for efficacy. Favorable bacteriologic responses occurred in 95.5% (255/267) of the netilmicin-treated sites and in 90.1% (247/274) of the gentamicin-treated sites (p = 0.05). Netilmicin eliminated or reduced 95.6% (283/296) of all pathogens isolated from all infection sites compared with 89.5% (289/323) for gentamicin (p = 0.012). Favorable clinical responses were observed in 94.2% (275/292) of the netilmicin-treated patients and 89.5% (289/323) of the gentamicin-treated patients. Data from 377 netilmicin-treated patients and 378 gentamicin-treated patients were analyzed for safety. Evidence of nephrotoxicity probably related to treatment was observed in 8 of the netilmicin-treated patients and 14 of the gentamicin-treated patients. Audiometrically documented hearing loss probably related to treatment was observed in one gentamicin-treated patient. In one netilmicin-treated patient there were transient auditory and vestibular effects. Local tolerance to parenteral administration of the two drugs was excellent.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Netilmicin/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Female , Gentamicins/administration & dosage , Gentamicins/adverse effects , Hearing Disorders/chemically induced , Humans , Kidney Diseases/chemically induced , Male , Netilmicin/administration & dosage , Netilmicin/adverse effects , Vestibular Function Tests
17.
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl ; Suppl 23: 20-9, 1980.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7010547

ABSTRACT

Netilmicin is a new semisynthetic aminoglycoside which was developed by Schering Corporation, USA, for the treatment of serious gram-negative and staphylococcal infections. Nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity in animal studies have indicated that netilmicin is both quantitatively and qualitatively safer than other aminoglycosides. Also, netilmicin has a broader spectrum of activity than either gentamicin or tobramycin. 37 clinical studies were conducted by 29 investigators in 10 countries. 840 courses of treatment in 960 infection sites were analyzed for effectiveness. Of the 724 courses in which a clinical determination could be made, 91% had either complete resolution or improvement. Bacteriologic responses were available for 782 infecting organisms and showed an 82% elimination rate. The pharmacokinetic profile of netilmicin permits twice daily administration in most patients with systemic infections and in all patients with urinary tract infections. The clinical safety of netilmicin was measured in 890 evaluable treatment courses, and only 0.4% auditory reactions, 0.6% vestibular reactions, and 0.9% renal reactions were considered to be probably netilmicin related, when netilmicin was given as recommended.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Netilmicin/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Female , Hearing Loss/chemically induced , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Kidney/drug effects , Male , Middle Aged , Netilmicin/adverse effects , Netilmicin/metabolism , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Skin Diseases, Infectious/drug therapy , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...