Preclinical evaluation of sunitinib as a single agent in the prophylactic setting in a mouse model of bone metastases.

BACKGROUND: A substantial number of breast cancer patients are identified as being at high risk of developing metastatic disease. With increasing number of targeted therapeutics entering clinical trials, chronic administration of these agents may be a feasible approach for the prevention of metastases within this subgroup of patients. In this preclinical study we examined whether sunitinib, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor which has anti-angiogenic and anti-resorptive activity, is effective in the prevention of bone metastases. METHOD: Sunitinib was administered daily with the first dose commencing prior to tumor cell inoculation. Intracardiac injection was performed with MDA-MB23 bone-seeking cells, which were stably transfected with DsRed2. In vivo plain radiography and fluorescent imaging (Berthold NightOwl) was used in the analysis of bone metastases. Histomorphometry was used for the quantification of TRAP+ cells from bone sections and immunohistochemistry was performed using an antibody reactive to CD34 for quantification of microvessel density. RESULTS: Preventive dosing administration of sunitinib does not inhibit colonization of tumor cells to bone or reduce the size of osteolytic lesions. There was a decrease in the number of TRAP+ cells with sunitinib treatment but this did not reach significance. Sunitinib inhibited tumor growth as determined by imaging of fluorescent tumor area. Immunohistochemical analyses of microvessel density revealed a concomitant decrease in the number of tumor blood vessels. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that sunitinib can be used as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of bone metastases but as a single agent it is not effective in terms of prevention. Therefore a combination approach with other cytostatic drugs should be pursued.

Application of ex vivo micro-computed tomography for assessment of in vivo fluorescence and plain radiographic imaging for monitoring bone metastases and osteolytic lesions.

The intracardiac injection model is a commonly used in vivo model to test therapeutic response in bone metastases. However, few studies have critically compared the performance of different imaging methods in terms of sensitivity and quantitative assessment of osteolytic lesions. We performed in vivo optical and plain radiographic imaging of bone metastases followed by high-sensitivity ex vivo micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging. This approach allowed for quantitative assessment of in vivo imaging techniques using fluorescence and plain radiography. Comparison of lesions detected in vivo by fluorescent optical imaging with ex vivo micro-CT revealed that the limited spatial resolution of fluorescent optical imaging may underestimate the number of bone metastases. Radiography was compared with micro-CT for the detection of osteolytic lesions. When using dichotomous yes/no grading, there was a 64% agreement in detection of osteolytic lesions. When subjective semiquantitative grading methods were used to assess the extent of osteolytic lesions, a positive association between the micro-CT grades and the square root of the radiography-based grades was observed (p < 0.05). Micro-CT also showed a significant association with fluorescent optical values; however, no such association was observed between lesion scores based on radiographs and those based on fluorescent imaging. The findings reveal an approximate two-fold sensitivity for micro-CT compared to plain radiography in the detection of osteolytic lesions. Significant associations between micro-CT-based osteolytic lesion grade and tumor growth characterized by increased fluorescent area document the value of these two techniques for the assessment of osteolytic bone metastases.