Complete substitution of the left ureter with vermicular appendix during hemicolectomy for cancer in an adult patient.

We demonstrated that a complete left ureteral substitution with appendix is a feasible and safe technique. To our knowledge, this is the first case of a successful complete substitution of the left ureter with vermicular appendix in an adult patient reported in the literature.

Splenic Artery Syndrome as a Possible Cause of Late Onset Refractory Ascites After Liver Transplantation: Management With Proximal Splenic Artery Embolization.

BACKGROUND: Portal hyperperfusion (PHP) is a hemodynamic condition which may develop after liver transplantation and cause refractory ascites (RA). The diagnosis is established by exclusion of other causes of increased sinusoidal pressure/resistance such as cellular rejection or toxicity and outflow obstruction. PHP as part of the pathogenesis of the splenic artery syndrome (SAS) can be treated with splenic artery embolization (SAE). METHODS: This is a retrospective study on a cohort of first-time whole-size liver transplant recipients diagnosed with RA due to PHP and treated by proximal SAE (pSAE) at the Liver Transplant Unit of the University Hospital of Udine between 2004 and 2014. RESULTS: For this study, 23 patients were identified (prevalence 8%) and treated. Preliminary clinical workup to diagnose SAS was based on exclusion of other possible causes of RA with graft biopsy, cavogram with hepatic venous pressure measurement, computed tomography scan, and angiography. The pSAE was performed 110 ± 61 days after transplantation, and no procedure-related complications occurred. pSAE resulted in a significant decrease of portal vein velocity (P = .01) and wedge hepatic venous pressure (P = .03). The diameter of the spleen showed a slightly significant reduction (P = .047); no modification of hepatic artery resistive index were encountered (P = .34). Moreover, pSAE determined the resolution of RA in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: pSAE is a safe and effective procedure to modulate the hepatic inflow and thus to treat RA secondary to SAS, with a low incidence of complications and a high rate of clinical response.

De Novo Solid Tumors After Kidney Transplantation: Is It Time for a Patient-Tailored Risk Assessment? Experience From a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: Progress in immunosuppressive therapy and perioperative techniques has improved the survivals of both grafts and patients. The patient, however, is exposed to the risks of aging and side effects of immunosuppression. De novo tumors are the 2nd cause of death in the organ transplant population. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the current accepted guidelines for the pre-transplantation study and the post-transplantation follow-up have been effective, in our kidney transplant population, regarding early detection and treatment, improving prognosis, and reducing mortality of some curable neoplastic diseases. METHODS: We considered de novo tumors in kidney transplant patients from 1995 to 2010 (n = 636) excluding hematologic and nonmelanoma skin tumors from our study. RESULTS: There were 64 de novo tumors in 59 patients out of 636 kidney transplant patients; 29.68% were urogenital cancer, 26.56% gastrointestinal cancer, 12.5% melanoma, 6.25% lung cancer, 6.25% biliopancreatic cancer, 4.68% visceral Kaposi sarcoma, 4.68% breast cancer, 4.68% thyroid cancer, 1 pleural mesothelioma, 1 meningioma, 1 merkeloma. Twenty patients died because of cancer. Ten patients had a late de novo tumor diagnosis, when the stage of tumor was advanced and not suitable for curative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the increased neoplastic risk, we consider it mandatory to carry out a meticulous screening and to implement pre-transplantation study concerning this increased neoplastic risk population to detect a subgroup of patients presenting the highest risk to improve their outcome.

Necrosis percentage of radiologically treated hepatocellular carcinoma at hepatectomy for liver transplantation.

Among a cohort of 414 liver transplantations (OLT) performed form 1996 to 2009, we analyzed 86 patients (20.7%) who were affected by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) superimposed on cirrhosis, including 82 with a preoperative diagnosis of tumor; 4 cases had the diagnosis established upon histologic examination after hepatectomy. The gender of 75 patients was male (91.5%), and female in 7 cases (8.5%). The median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 10 (range, 6-23). The underlying liver disease was hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis (41.46%), hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis (15.6%), or alcohol-related cirrhosis (29.3%); cryptogenic; HCV+HIV; HBV+HIV; or HCV+HBV+HIV cirrhosis were present in an other few patients. The diagnosis of HCC and the preoperative staging were defined through radiologic evaluations, without biopsy confirmation in any case. All patients underwent pretransplant radiologic treatments to reduce the drop-out risk while a waiting OLT; OLT was performed for HCC patients within the Milan criteria. Upon histologic examination, the median HCC necrosis was 57 ± 36%; in 22 cases (26.8%), there were no necrotizing effects. Forty patients (48.8%) display a satisfying degree of disease control with 26 patients (31.7%) downstaged effect; 15 patients (18.3%) showed neoplastic progression with advanced neoplastic disease exceeding the Milan criteria at hepatectomy. One patient had nonevaluable necrosis (1.2%). Our experience showed preoperative radiologic treatments to be not curative but serving as a bridge to OLT.

Sequential versus contemporaneous portal and arterial reperfusion during liver transplantation.

Although sequential portal and arterial revascularization (SPAr) is the most common method of graft reperfusion at liver transplantation (OLT), contemporaneous portal and hepatic artery revascularization (CPAr) has been used to reduce arterial ischemia to the bile ducts. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare SPAr (group 1; n=19) versus CPAr (group 2; n=21) among 40 consecutive OLT from heart-beating donors. There were no differences in the demographics characteristics, Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores, indication for OLT and donor parameters between the groups. OLT was performed using the piggyback technique. The biliary anastomosis was performed in all cases by a duct-to-duct technique with a T-tube in 32% versus 29% of cases without a T tube (P=.83). In the CPAr group, the liver was reperfused simultaneously via the portal vein and hepatic artery. CPAr showed a longer warm ischemia (66 ± 8 vs 37 ± 7 minutes; P<.001), while SPAr had a longer arterial ischemia 103 ± 42 vs 66 ± 8 minutes (P=.0004). Recovery of graft function was similar. There was no primary nonfunction and delayed graft function occurred among 10% versus 9%. Liver function tests were similar between the two groups up to 90 days case of follow-up- One-year graft and patient survivals were, respectively, 89% and 95% versus 94% and 100% (P=.29). At a median follow-up of 13 ± 6 versus 14 ± 7 months, biliary complications included anastomotic stenoses in 15% versus 19% (P=.78) and intrahepatic non-anastomotic biliary strictures in 26% versus none (P=.01) for SPAr and CPAr, respectively. CPAr was safe and feasible, reducing the incidence of intrahepatic biliary strictures by decreasing the duration of arterial ischemia to the intrahepatic bile ducts.

Long-term outcomes of orthotopic liver transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients and comparison with human immunodeficiency virus-negative cases.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity is no longer a contraindication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) due to the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy. The aim of this study was to compare OLT among HIV-positive and HIV-negative cohorts; the results were also stratified for hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection. Between 2004 and 2009, all HIV-infected patients undergoing OLT from heart-beating deceased donors (n=27) were compared with an HIV-negative cohort (n = 27). The pure HCV infection rate was similar between HIV-positive and HIV-negative subjects (63% each). HIV-positive recipients were younger (P=.013). The CD4 count for HIV-positive subjects was 376 ± 156 at transplantation. The mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score at transplantation was 15 ± 7 in both groups (P=.92). No differences were observed for donor age (P=.72) or time on the waiting list (P=.56). The median follow-up was 26 (range, 1-64) and 27 months (range, 1-48) for HIV and non-HIV recipients, respectively (P=.85). The estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient and graft survival rates were 88%, 83%, and 83% versus 100%, 73%, and 73% (P=.95), and 92%, 87%, and 87% versus 95%, 88%, and 88% (P=.59) for HIV and non-HIV cases, respectively. HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were younger, namely 47 (range, 40-53) versus 52 years (range, 37-68; P=.003), and displayed lower MELD scores at transplantation compared with HCV-mono-infected patients 10 (range, 7-19) versus 17 (range, 8-30) (P=.008). For HIV/HCV-coinfected and HCV-mono-infected cases the estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year patients and graft survival rates were respectively 93%, 76%, and 76% versus 100%, 70%, and 60% (P=.99) and 93%, 84%, and 84% versus 100%, 70%, and 60% (P=.64), respectively. No difference was observed in the histological severity of HCV recurrence. In conclusion, under specific, well-determined conditions, OLT can be a safe, efficacious procedure in HIV patients.

Contemporaneous Portal-Arterial Reperfusion during Liver Transplantation: Preliminary Results.

We prospectively compared sequential portal-arterial revascularization (SPAr, group 1 no. 19) versus contemporaneous portal-hepatic artery revascularization (CPAr, group 2 no. 21) in 40 consecutive liver transplantation (LT). There were no differences in the demographics characteristics, MELD score, indication to LT, and donor's parameters between the two groups. CPAr had longer warm ischemia 66 ± 8 versus 37 ± 7 min (P < .001), while SPAr had longer arterial ischemia 103 ± 42 min (P = .0004). One-year patient's and graft survival were, respectively, 89% and 95% versus 94% and 100% (P = .29). At median followup of 13 ± 6 versus 14 ± 7 months biliary complications were anastomotic stenosis in 15% versus 19% (P = .78), and intrahepatic nonanastomotic biliary strictures in 26% versus none (P = .01), respectively, in SPAr and CPAr. CPAr reduces the incidence of intrahepatic biliary strictures by decreasing the duration of arterial ischemia.

Cardiovascular risk factors and immunosuppressive regimen after liver transplantation.

Cardiovascular and metabolic diseases represent important long-term complications after liver transplantation (LT), impairing long-term and disease-free survivals. A few mechanisms underlie the development of those complications, but the role of immunosuppressive drugs is major. Although several patients develop temporary metabolic diseases, which normalize after a short postoperative period and do not need long-term drug therapy, the incidences of de novo long-lasting arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus are high during the first year after LT. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate new-onset arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or diabetes among 100 LT patients at a single institution. We used chi-square statistical analysis to compare incidences during tacrolimus versus cyclosporine therapy. Hypertension did not seem to be more strongly related to tacrolimus than to cyclosporine, nor did diabetes, whereas there was a difference for the development of hyperlipidemia.

Apurinic apyrimidinic endonuclease/redox effector factor 1 immunoreactivity and grading in hepatocellular carcinoma risk of relapse after liver transplantation.

Apurinic apyrimidinic endonuclease (APE1)/redox effector factor 1 (Ref-1), which is a multifunction protein involved in both transcriptional regulation of gene expression during adaptive cellular responses to oxidative stress and in the base excision repair pathway of DNA lesions generated as a consequence of oxidant-induced base damage, contributes to the maintenance of genome stability. APE1/Ref-1 is normally localized in the nucleus; cytoplasmic localization observed in several tumors has been correlated with a poor prognosis. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) grading is an essential tool to predict the risk of relapse and patient prognosis, particularly in patients undergoing liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study was to identify the role of APE1/Ref-1 in predicting a posttransplant HCC relapse. We studied 48 patients transplanted for HCC to define grading as well as nuclear and cytoplasmic APE1/Ref-1 expression within neoplastic versus nonneoplastic parenchyma. We defined a cutoff of 60% of cytoplasmic APE1/Ref-1 expression to identify positive cases. At a minimum of 1.5-year follow-up after transplantation, 32 patients are alive and 16 patients are deceased after HCC relapse. Among low-grade HCC (grades 1 and 2), 76% of cases are alive; only 34% showed cytoplasmic APE1/Ref-1 immunoreactivity. Among the high-grade cases (grades 3 and 4), 50% were alive with 64% showing cytoplasmic immunoreactivity. Nuclear reactivity was generally similar either in neoplastic or in cirrhotic livers, irrespective of the grade. These data seemed to support the hypothesis of a predictive role of APE1/Ref-1 for HCC risk of relapse, which together with tumor grade by analysis of a pretransplant needle biopsy should aid decision making for OLT.

Safety of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf) to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf) in stable liver transplant recipients.

Nonadherence to immunosuppressive regimens among solid organ transplantation to range has been estimated from 15% to 55%. This problem has been identified as a leading cause of preventable graft loss. Tacrolimus once daily Advagraf has been developed to provide a more convenient dosing regimen to improve adherence. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety of a 1:1 dose conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf) to Advagraf in 36 stable liver transplant recipients. The tacrolimus whole blood trough level at T0 was 6.7 +/- 2.9 ng/mL with a daily dose of 3.7 +/- 1.8 mg. The mean tacrolimus blood trough levels at T1 (7 days) and T2 (14 days) were 5.8 +/- 2.5 and 5.8 +/- 1.8 ng/mL with mean daily doses of 3.9 +/- 1.9 and 4.1 +/- 1.8 mg, respectively. There was no significant difference between T0, T1, and T2, either for tacrolimus blood trough levels or for tacrolimus daily dosages. Liver and renal function tests remained stable; no episodes of acute rejection were encountered after the conversion. A switching policy using a dose ratio of 1:1 from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus was safely applied to stable liver transplant recipients.

Comparison of de novo tumours after liver transplantation with incidence rates from Italian cancer registries.

AIM: The purpose of this study is to describe de novo post-liver transplant malignancies and compare their frequency with incidence rates from Italian cancer registries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred and seventeen patients subjected to liver transplantation, from 1991 to 2005, surviving for at least 30 days and without a previous diagnosis of cancer (including hepatocellular carcinoma), were evaluated for the development of de novo malignancies excluding non-melanoma skin cancers. RESULTS: During a total follow-up time of 2856 person-years, 43 de novo malignancies were diagnosed in 43 liver transplantation recipients (10.3%). The most common cancers were non-Hodgkin lymphoma (9 cases), cancer of the head and neck (8 cases), Kaposi's sarcoma (6 cases) and esophageal carcinoma (5 cases). The 1, 3, 5 and 10 years estimated survival rates were 69%, 57%, 53% and 42%. Patients with de novo cancers had a lower 10-year survival rate than patients without cancers (58% versus 76%, p=0.005). The risk of cancer after liver transplantation was nearly 3-fold higher than that of the general population of the same age and sex (95% CI: 1.9-3.6). De novo tumour sites or types with significantly elevated SIR included Kaposi's sarcoma (SIR=144), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (SIR=13.8), esophagus (SIR=23.4), head and neck cancers (SIR=7) and cervix uteri (SIR=30.7). CONCLUSIONS: Tumours after liver transplantation are associated with lower long-term survival, confirming that cancer is a major cause of late mortality in liver transplantation.

Evaluation of prostate cancer staging in organ donors: intraoperative histology on periglandular soft tissues-a proposal.

An histopathologic screening method for prostate cancer assessment in organ donors is crucial because of the widening of the donor pool to older individuals. Evaluation of cancer grading with multiple biopsies is fundamental in the cases of abnormal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values and suspect ultrasound findings. However, multiple biopsies may fail to represent the whole neoplasia, and grading may be difficult particularly because there may not be information about capsular penetration. Since October 2007, 20 prostate autopsy specimens were submitted to an histopathologic screening method of the entire prostate based on extemporary frozen section analysis (maximum 75 minutes) of shavings of samples of the lateral surfaces of the prostate gland: namely, approximately 5 samples or 7 in the case of a large gland. We produced 3-mm-thick step sections at three levels: the first was immediately taken at the cutting level, and then 30-microm sections were discarded. The following three levels of 5 microm intervals for 10 sections for each level were evaluated. There were 7 cases of undiagnosed prostate cancer, three of which were demonstrated on frozen sections with neoplastic foci of extraglandular infiltration within connective and adipose tissues outside the gland. No neoplasia was present in the other 13 cases. In all cases, the final diagnosis was confirmed by the extemporary analysis. Our goal was to confirm the optimal number of samples that were representative of the whole prostatic contour, to define time to diagnosis and to evaluate reproducibility of frozen-section histopathologic screening compared with paraffin sections. This novel approach should permit a more refined risk-benefit analysis.

Technical aspects of living-related liver donation: single-center experience.

Living-related donor liver transplantation is the newest and both technically and ethically most challenging evolution in liver transplantation and has contributed to reduction in donor shortage. We briefly report the technical aspects of surgical procedures performed to achieve a partial graft from a live donor. Eighty-four adult and two pediatric recipients underwent living-related donor liver transplantation at our center. There were no donor deaths, and all patients returned to their normal activities after the perioperative period. This single-center experience may contribute to refinement of the surgical technique required to improve the outcome of these complex operations.

Elderly versus young liver transplant recipients: patient and graft survival.

The indications for organ transplantation continue to broaden with advances in perioperative care and immunosuppression. The elderly have especially benefited from this progress; advanced age is no longer considered a contraindication to transplantation at most centers. Although numerous studies support the use of renal allografts in older patients, only a few centers have addressed this issue as it pertains to liver transplantation. Published studies have revealed that operative course, length of hospitalization, and incidence of perioperative complications among patients older than 60 years of age are comparable with their younger adult counterparts. In our study we analyzed the clinical experiences of two centers with primary cadaveric orthotopic liver transplantations comparing patients older than 63 with patients younger than 40 years of age, suggesting no difference in unadjusted survival with age stratification. Now age cannot be considered to be a contraindication to liver transplantation.

De novo tumors are a major cause of late mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation.

The purpose of this study was to describe de novo post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) malignancies for comparison with incidence rates in Italian cancer registries. Three hundred thirteen OLT patients engrafted from 1991 to 2006 and surviving 12 months without a previous diagnosis of cancer were evaluated for the development of de novo malignancies excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers. During a total follow-up time of 1753 PYs, 40 (12.8%) de novo malignancies were diagnosed in 40 recipients. The most common cancers were non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; 20%), cancer of the head and neck (17%), Kaposi sarcoma (KS; 17%), and esophageal tumors (12%). The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year estimated survival rates were 70%, 56%, 48%, and 39%. Patients with de novo cancers showed a lower 10-years survival rate (P = .0047) than patients without (39% vs 75%). The risk of cancer after OLT was 3-fold higher than that of the general population of the same age and gender (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-4.3). De novo tumor sites or types with significantly elevated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) included KS (SIRs = 212), NHL (SIRs = 13.7), oesophagus (SIRs = 18.7), melanoma (SIRs = 10.1), and head and neck cancers (SIRs = 4.6). Tumors after OLT were associated with lower long-term survival, confirming that cancer is a major cause of late mortality.

Steatosis of the graft is a risk factor for posttransplantation biliary complications.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in organ preservation, immunosuppression, and surgical techniques, the biliary tree is still considered the Achilles' heel of liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the incidence of biliary complications and identify predisposing risk factors. METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2007, 117 consecutive deceased donor liver transplantations were retrospectively analyzed for the development of biliary complications by review of medical records. Patients were divided into group 1 with biliary complications (n = 43) and group 2 without biliary complications (n = 74). RESULTS: The overall biliary complication rate was 36.8%; leakage 6% and stricture 30.8%. Univariate analysis indicated that significant predictors of biliary complications were the time interval between portal and arterial reperfusion (P = .037) and macrovacuolar steatosis of the graft >25% (P = .004). A stepwise logistic regression model demonstrated that >25% macrosteatosis of the graft was the only independent risk factor predicting biliary complications after liver transplantation (odds ratio [OR] = 5.21; CI 95% [1.79-15.15]; P = .002). No differences were noted in patient or graft survival between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Transplantation of a liver with >25% steatosis was a risk factor for the development of a biliary complication.

Graft vessel wall pathology in a case of hepatic artery pseudo-aneurysm in a liver transplant recipient.

Pseudo-aneurysms (PAs) of the hepatic artery are rare complications of liver transplantation, which are characterized by a high mortality rate. The majority occur within the first 2 months after orthotopic liver transplantation. They become clinically manifest with sudden hypotension, gastrointestinal bleeding, and abnormal liver function test results. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to prevent life-threatening hemorrhage. Conventional treatment consists of surgical resection and vascular reconstruction, but a feasible treatment option involves an angiographic approach with the positioning of a stent or transarterial coil embolization followed by revascularization. We report a case of posttransplantation hepatic artery PA (HA-PA) with bleeding into the duodenum, diagnosed using abdominal computed tomography (CT). Arterial kinking prevented a covered stent graft from being inserted successfully using X-ray angiography, so the patient underwent emergency surgery in an attempt to exclude the PA and revascularize the organ via an aorto-hepatic bypass with an iliac vascular graft obtained from the donor. The surgical procedure failed due to progressive macroscopic dissection of the HA wall up to the bifurcation. The patient underwent retransplantation but died 25 days later due to multiple-organ failure. Histopathology of the first liver graft confirmed arterial graft dissection and pathological changes in the donor HA wall.

[Uretero-vescical anastomosis during kidney transplantation. Preliminary results of two surgical techniques]. / L'anastomosi uretero-vescicale nel trapianto di rene. Risultati preliminari di due tecniche a confronto.

AIM: The most frequent urologic complications after renal transplantation involve the uretero-vescical anastomosis (leakage, stenosis, and reflux), with a frequency of 1% to 30% in different series. METHODS: We present our results in a prospective randomized trial performed from October 2004 to September 2005, in a cohort of 36 patients, who underwent renal transplantation from cadaveric donor at our institution. A uretero-vescical anastomosis according to Lich-Gregoir was used in 18 cases (group A), whereas an anastomosis according to Knechtle was performed in other 18 patients (group B), respectively. The groups were comparable for donors and recipients characteristics. The mean donor age was 46.3 years vs 44.9 years, and the mean duration of cold ischemia was 1 086+/-296 min vs 1 100+/-381 min for group A and for group B respectively. The mean recipient age was 47.5 years vs 46.1 for group A and group B, respectively. RESULTS: No differences were evidenced between the two uretero-vescical anastomosis in term of surgical complications, infections or patient and graft survival at one year of follow-up. Stenosis and leakage involved 2 patients for each group respectively. Numbers of infections, days of antibiotic therapy were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our early experience does not evidence differences between the two types of uretero-vescical anastomosis.

Intraperitoneal Tenckhoff catheter for the treatment of recurrent lymphoceles after kidney transplantation: our early experience.

Lymphoceles may occur as frequently as 16% of the time after kidney transplantation, becoming clinically evident between 18 and 180 days after surgery. The management of lymphoceles is unclear. Percutaneous needle aspiration and external drainage are associated with high recurrence and complications. Surgical intraperitoneal marsupialization of lymphocele is considered the treatment of choice, but requires hospital admission, general anesthesia, and sometimes extensive surgical dissection. We discuss our experience in the treatment of recurrent symptomatic lymphocele intraperitoneally drained using a Tenckhoff catheter in 7 consecutive patients. Clinical manifestations became evident between 26 and 90 days after transplantation. The diagnosis was obtained with abdominal ultrasound in all cases; mean lymphocele diameter was 14 +/- 6 cm. After percutaneous drainage, performed to differentiate urinoma/lymphocele and to rule out infections, the lymphocele recurred within 1 month. Thereafter, we decided to treat recurrent lymphatic collection using a Tenckhoff catheter. The lymphocele was located during the operative procedure using a sterile 3.5-MHz ultrasound probe. With the patient under local anesthesia, we performed 2 vertical 1-cm incisions to the lymphocele and peritoneum, respectively. The Tenckoff catheter was first positioned into the lymphocele and the tunneled inside the peritoneal cavity. One cuff of the Tenckhoff was fixed to the fascia to avoid possible delocalization. The patients were discharged the same day. The catheter was removed 6 months later with no evidence of lymphocele recurrence.

Comparison of two techniques of arterial anastomosis during adult cadaveric liver transplantation.

Arterial complications are a major source of morbidity and mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) ranges from 1.6% to 8%, with a mortality rate that ranges from 11% to 35%. We have described herein a technique of arterial anastomosis aiming to perform the anastomosis as straight as possible to avoid any kinking, redundancy, or malposition of the artery when the liver is released in its final position. We compared this technique with the traditional technique of arterial anastomosis using an aortic Carrel patch, namely, 198 OLT (group A) with the traditional technique and 117 OLT (group B) with the modified technique. An aorto-hepatic bypass was necessary in 25% of the cases in group A and in 21% of the cases in group B (P = .33). Vascular anomalies were present in 20% of cases in group A and in 27.5% in group B (P = .14). Fourteen cases (7%) of HAT developed in group A versus 0 cases in group B (P = .003). In group B, we experienced 2 (1.7%) late arterial stenoses that were successfully treated using percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. The 14 cases of HAT occurring in group A were successfully managed using immediate surgical revascularization with graft salvage in 6 cases (43%), whereas the remaining 8 cases needed urgent retransplantation. We suggest that a technique of arterial anastomosis aimed at avoiding kinking, redundancy, or malposition of the artery may be a viable option to reduce the risk of HAT after OLT.