ABSTRACT
Background: Topical capsaicin has been used to treat vulvodynia but has been poorly studied for use in neuroproliferative provoked vestibulodynia (PVD); capsaicin decreases allodynia by blocking vanilloid receptors (TRPV1) on C-afferent nociceptors, but the therapy causes discomfort to the point of intolerance in some patients. Aim: The present study evaluated tolerability and efficacy of topical capsaicin to treat neuroproliferative PVD. Methods: Patients with neuroproliferative PVD prescribed 0.025% capsaicin compounded in VersaBase cream were identified through prescription records. Outcome measures included the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised, and a 22-question questionnaire assessing patient experience and treatment tolerability. Outcomes: Among tolerant patients, capsaicin significantly decreased vestibular pain, but tolerance was highly variable. Results: Twenty-five patients responded to the follow-up questionnaire. The average age at presentation was 30 years (range, 18-52 years). Eighty percent of patients tolerated capsaicin application for the full 20 minutes within a median time of 1 to 2 weeks. Of the 16 patients reporting tolerance to 20-minute application, 12 (60%) experienced improvement in vestibular pain. On an 11-point numeric rating scale, the mean pain score was 8.96 and the median score was 10 with first application. Among all participants, 16 (64%) had reduction in pain during treatment. Fifty-six percent of patients would recommend capsaicin as a treatment for vulvar pain. Qualitative content analysis focused on categories of efficacy, value, and feasibility, which indicated that those able to tolerate the treatment experienced improvement while using the medication. The mean Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised score was 35.96 at baseline compared with 25.09 at follow-up (P < .0001). On a numeric rating scale, the mean self-reported vulvar pain score was 8.2 at baseline compared with 5.35 when using capsaicin consistently (P < .0001). The mean FSFI pain domain score was 2.45 at baseline compared with 0.98 at follow-up (P = .005). While not statistically significant, the mean total FSFI score was 15.44 at baseline compared with 17.84 at follow-up (P = .3730). Clinical Implications: Capsaicin is helpful for some patients with PVD, but thorough counseling is important because of highly variable tolerance. Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include examination of a poorly studied therapy and inclusion of narrative responses from patients to inform counseling. Limitations include small sample size, retrospective design, and low survey response rate. Conclusion: Patients should be appropriately selected and thoroughly counseled given high levels of intolerance, but capsaicin therapy may be considered for patients with neuroproliferative PVD who have failed conservative treatments and wish to avoid surgery.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Keratin pearls are foci of central keratinization within concentric layers of squamous cells that can form under the clitoral prepuce and cause pain (clitorodynia); in-office removal of keratin pearls may reduce clitoral pain and improve sexual function. AIM: This study aims to investigate clitoral pain and sexual function in women with partial clitoral phimosis and keratin pearls before and after in-office lysis of clitoral adhesions with keratin pearl excision (LCA-KPE). METHODS: A pre-post interventional study evaluated patients who underwent LCA-KPE between January 2017 and February 2023 in 2 metropolitan gynecology clinics specializing in vulvar pain. Patients presenting with keratin pearls and partial clitoral phimosis identified through retrospective chart review were asked to complete postprocedure questionnaires and provide subjective responses on clitoral discomfort, sexual function, sexual distress, and their experience with in-office LCA-KPE. Bivariate analyses with paired t tests were conducted to determine the effect of LCA-KPE. Qualitative data were analyzed with thematic coding. OUTCOMES: An 11-point pain visual analog scale was utilized to determine pre- and postprocedure clitoral discomfort and difficulty with orgasm. Female sexual dysfunction was measured with the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised. RESULTS: A total of 32 of 74 patients who met inclusion criteria completed postprocedure surveys (43% response rate). Mean clitoral pain for respondents was 6.91 at baseline and 2.50 after LCA-KPE (P < .001). Mean difficulty with orgasm was significantly decreased from 5.45 at baseline to 3.13 after LCA-KPE (P < .001). Participants had a mean FSFI total score of 17.68 after treatment compared with a mean total baseline FSFI of 12.12 (P = .017). The mean FSFI score for pain was 2.43 at follow-up compared with 1.37 at baseline (P = .049). There was no significant difference in the mean Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised score before vs after the procedure (P = .27). Qualitative themes described the procedure as painful but worthwhile, with 77% of participants reporting the overall experience as positive. Recurrence rate overall was 28%, with a median of 2 repeat procedures. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Recognizing keratin pearls as a structural cause of clitoral pain and offering in-office treatment is an important tool in addressing clitorodynia and improving sexual function. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This is the largest study to date documenting the occurrence, identifying associated pain conditions, and evaluating procedural outcomes for clitoral keratin pearls. This study was limited by a relatively small sample size. CONCLUSION: In-office LCA-KPE significantly reduced clitoral discomfort and difficulty with orgasm.
