ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Health disparities for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) adults are well documented, but LGBT health data at the municipal and county levels are lacking, especially in the southern United States. The objective of this study was to compare access to care, health outcomes, and behavioral risk factors between LGBT and non-LGBT adults in Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee. METHODS: Data for this study came from a randomly selected, population-based sample of LGBT (n = 128) and non-LGBT (n = 1583) adults in Nashville. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compare health outcomes between LGBT and non-LGBT Nashvillians while adjusting for demographic characteristics and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: LGBT Nashvillians were more likely to be uninsured (odds ratio [OR] 3.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.72-9.10), report unmet medical care needs because of cost (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.14-4.25), exhibit worse mental health outcomes (eg, frequent mental distress; OR 4.53, 95% CI 2.33-8.80), and report high-risk behaviors for human immunodeficiency virus (OR 9.47, 95% CI 3.96-22.62) compared with non-LGBT Nashvillians. CONCLUSIONS: To achieve health equity for LGBT individuals at the municipal level, Nashville and Tennessee should consider multifaceted approaches to expanding health insurance coverage and nondiscrimination protections and address mental health and human immunodeficiency virus risks among vulnerable populations.
Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , Sexual and Gender Minorities/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Health Surveys , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Medically Uninsured/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Tennessee , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The abrupt closure of universities across the U.S. in March 2020 may have sent some lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) college students home to unsafe or unaccepting families and environments. The objective of this study was to examine the mental health needs of LGBT college students in the U.S. during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We fielded a rapid-response online survey in the spring of 2020. We recruited 477 LGBT-identifying college students aged 18-25 years by contacting LGBT-serving organizations on 254 college campuses and through targeted social media advertising. RESULTS: Nearly half (45.7%) of LGBT college students have immediate families that do not support or know their LGBT identity. Approximately 60% of sampled LGBT college students were experiencing psychological distress, anxiety, and depression during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Health-care providers, college and university administrators, and campus counseling centers should take swift action to ensure that LGBT students receive mental health support during the pandemic.