STereotactic Ablative RadioTherapy in NEWly Diagnosed and Recurrent Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Unfit for ConcurrEnt RAdio-Chemotherapy: Early Analysis of the START-NEW-ERA Non-Randomised Phase II Trial.

PURPOSE: This is a single arm phase 2 trial (Clinical trials.gov NCT05291780) to assess local control (LC) and safety of SAbR in patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) unfit for concurrent chemo-radiation therapy (ChT-RT). METHODS: Neoadjuvant ChT was prescribed in fit patients. The tumor volume included primary tumor and any regionally positive node/s. The coprimary study endpoints were LC and safety. RESULTS: Between December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2020, 50 patients with LA-NSCLC were enrolled. Histology was squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma (ADC) in 52% and 48%, respectively. Forty (80%) patients had ultracentral tumor. Twenty-seven (54%) received neoadjuvant ChT and 7 (14%) adjuvant durvalumab. Median prescribed dose was 45 Gy (range, 35-55) and 40 Gy (35-45) in 5 daily fractions to tumor and node/s, respectively. After a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 12-80), 19 (38%) patients had experienced local recurrence (LR) at a median time of 13 months (range, 7-34). The median LR-free survival (FS) was not reached (95% confidence interval [CI], 28 to not reached). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year LR-FS rates were 86% ± 5%, 66% ± 7%, and 56% ± 8%, respectively. At last follow-up, 33 (66%) patients were alive. Median overall survival (OS) was 55 months (95% CI, 43-55 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 94% ± 3%, 79% ± 6%, and 72% ± 7%, respectively. No patients developed ≥ grade (G) 3 toxicity. ADC (hazard ratio [HR], 3.61; 95% CI, 1.15-11.35) was a significant predictor of better LC, while OS was significantly conditioned by smaller planning target volumes (HR, 1.004; 95% CI, 1.001-1.010) and tumor, node, and metastasis stage (HR, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.34-17). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LA-NSCLC treated with SABR had optimal LC and promising OS in absence of ≥G3 toxicity. Our early outcomes would suggest the feasibility of using this approach in patients with LA-NSCLC unfit for concurrent ChT-RT.

Analysis of the Different Lymphatic Drainage Patterns during Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Skin Melanoma.

In the last two decades, studies of lymphoscintigraphy imaging in lymphatic mapping reported an extreme heterogeneity of skin lymphatic drainage of some skin area, in contrast with the previous scientific literature. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of any correlations between the topographical location of cutaneous melanoma and the topographical location of sentinel lymph nodes. Data from 165 patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy between January 2013 and May 2021 were analyzed, demonstrating that melanomas in the Lumbar region presented a significant more heterogeneous drainage by site than those in the Scapular region (p < 0.01) and that melanomas in the Subscapular region were significantly more heterogeneous by laterality (unilateral vs. bilateral) than those in the Scapular region (p < 0.05). Results of this study supported the evidence of multiple lymphatic drainage as regards the sentinel node biopsy performed in skin melanoma located on the dorsal subscapular region and lumbar region. For this reason, the association of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with another imaging evaluation is needed in these critical cutaneous areas. Recent technical developments enabling fluorescence lymphography together with indocyanine green have significantly improved the visualization of lymphatic drainage patterns at a microscopic level. In the preoperative phase, any doubt can be resolved by associating the SPET-CT scan to lymphoscintigraphy, while during the intraoperative phase, an additional evaluation with indocyanine green can be performed in doubtful cases. The aim of the duplex lymphatic mapping (pre and/or intraoperative) is an accurate search of sentinel nodes, in order to reduce the rate of false negatives.

Prevalence of interstitial pneumonia suggestive of COVID-19 at 18F-FDG PET/CT in oncological asymptomatic patients in a high prevalence country during pandemic period: a national multi-centric retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To assess the presence and pattern of incidental interstitial lung alterations suspicious of COVID-19 on fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) ([18F]FDG PET/CT) in asymptomatic oncological patients during the period of active COVID-19 in a country with high prevalence of the virus. METHODS: This is a multi-center retrospective observational study involving 59 Italian centers. We retrospectively reviewed the prevalence of interstitial pneumonia detected during the COVID period (between March 16 and 27, 2020) and compared to a pre-COVID period (January-February 2020) and a control time (in 2019). The diagnosis of interstitial pneumonia was done considering lung alterations of CT of PET. RESULTS: Overall, [18F]FDG PET/CT was performed on 4008 patients in the COVID period, 19,267 in the pre-COVID period, and 5513 in the control period. The rate of interstitial pneumonia suspicious for COVID-19 was significantly higher during the COVID period (7.1%) compared with that found in the pre-COVID (5.35%) and control periods (5.15%) (p < 0.001). Instead, no significant difference among pre-COVID and control periods was present. The prevalence of interstitial pneumonia detected at PET/CT was directly associated with geographic virus diffusion, with the higher rate in Northern Italy. Among 284 interstitial pneumonia detected during COVID period, 169 (59%) were FDG-avid (average SUVmax of 4.1). CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase of interstitial pneumonia incidentally detected with [18F]FDG PET/CT has been demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic. A majority of interstitial pneumonia were FDG-avid. Our results underlined the importance of paying attention to incidental CT findings of pneumonia detected at PET/CT, and these reports might help to recognize early COVID-19 cases guiding the subsequent management.

A prospective phase II trial on reirradiation of brain metastases with radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: In our previous published trial on radiosurgery (SRS) of recurrent brain metastases (BM) after whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and administered dose conditioned outcome and late toxicity, respectively. Brain radionecrosis was registered in 6% of patients. With the aim to obtain similar satisfactory outcomes and limit toxicity, we started a phase II trial in which reirradiation of BM with SRS were done using a tighter patient selection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with BM recurring after WBRT were recruited for reirradiation with SRS. Only patients with good KPS (≥70), good neurologic functional score (NFS 0-1) and lesions with a diameter ≤20 mm were considered eligible for retreatment. Dose exceeding 20 Gy was never administered. RESULTS: The 59 patients reirradiated had 109 BM with a diameter range of 6-20 mm. Median interval between prior WBRT and SRS was 15 months and median SRS administered dose was 18 Gy (range 10-20 Gy). Complete and partial response (CR, PR) was obtained in 42% of patients with 2 years of control rate of 81%. Median overall survival (OS) after reirradiation was 14 months. No radionecrosis was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of our current trial compared with results of our previous data suggests that a tighter patient selection (KPS ≥ 70; NFS 0-1, BM with ≤20 mm of diameter) and SRS dose ≤20 Gy allowed a high OS rate, a good percentage of CR and PR which last for >2 years, and no brain radionecrosis.

Positron emission tomography for staging locally advanced cervical cancer and assessing intensity modulated radiotherapy approach.

AIMS: To evaluate toxicity and outcome of concomitant chemotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) based simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). METHODS: Patients with LACC underwent chemo-radiation with IMRT and SIB. Staging and follow-up were performed with clinical evaluation and CT, MRI, 18FDG-PET/CT. SIB was done on positive nodes with 18FDG-PET/CT based planning. CT-based planning high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) was delivered as subsequent boost to the primary tumor. Cisplatin concomitant chemotherapy was administered during IMRT. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with cervical cancer were prospectively recruited between August 2014 and June 2017, 13 (93%) had a LACC, one (7%) patient was not evaluable because 18FDG-PET/CT evidenced metastases to the liver undetected by previous CT/MRI. Patients had a median age of 59 years, a median Karnofsky performance status of 100%, and a prevalence of squamous cell carcinoma histology (85%). SIB was delivered on 23 positive lymph nodes. IMRT median dose to the pelvis was 48.6 Gy in 27 fractions, SIB median dose 54 Gy in 27 fractions, HDR-BT boost median dose 21 Gy in 3 fractions. After a median follow-up of 30 months, 2-year local control and distant control were 86% and 86%, respectively. There were no grade 4 acute and/or late toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: The 18FDG-PET/CT influenced stage assessment and RT treatment planning due to its high specificity in distant metastases and nodal involvement detection. The IMRT with SIB for positive nodes was an effective therapy with acceptable toxicity in LACC.

A rare breast tumor: solid neuroendocrine carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Solid neuroendocrine carcinoma of breast (NECB) is extremely rare. In this paper, we present a case of inflammatory primary solid neuroendocrine carcinoma of breast managed by surgery and chemotherapy and a brief review of the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, pathologic features, treatment, and prognosis of solid NECB. METHODS: A 63-year-old woman was admitted in our institution with inflammatory primary solid neuroendocrine carcinoma of breast. A bulky mass of 6,5 cm tumor was located in the upper-outer and intern quadrant of her right breast. The patient underwent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and subsequent radical mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. Microscopically, the tumor was classified as solid cohesive, the tumor cells were positive for neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin. 19 lymph nodes of 27 were metastatic. RESULTS: Local recurrence and metastatic progression was noted only one month after the surgery, the patient was managed by chemotherapy and hormone-therapy. She is still alive, 24 months after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Solid neuroendocrine carcinoma is a subtype of mammary carcinoma with several distinctive features. Because of the rarity of this disease, there is no standard treatment, they are characterized by a higher propensity for local and distant recurrence, This case reinforces the importance to explore the novels therapeutics regimen and one of ways to explore is the use of VP16-cisplatine as treatment as it was partially efficacy for this kind of tumor.

Reirradiation of brain metastases with radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcome of reirradiation with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases (BM) recurring after whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 2001 and October 2008, 69 patients who recurred after WBRT were re-irradiated with SRS using a linear accelerator. The dose prescription was generally chosen according to maximum diameter of the tumor as suggested by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 90-05 protocol. Patients were stratified by Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Neurologic Functional Score (NFS), RTOG Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA), Score Index for Radiosurgery (SIR), primary disease, dimension and number of BM, and time to first brain recurrence after WBRT. Response, survival, and toxicity were analyzed. RESULTS: At time of this retrospective analysis all patients had died. The 69 patients reirradiated with SRS had 150 metastases. Median interval between prior WBRT and SRS was 11 months and median SRS prescribed dose was 20 Gy. Response was obtained in 91% of lesions with 1-year local control rate of 74±4%. Significantly longer duration of response was associated with higher doses (≥23 Gy) and response achieved after SRS (complete and partial response better than stable disease). Cause of death was brain failure only in 36 (52%) patients. Median overall survival after reirradiation was 10 months. Variables which significantly conditioned survival were KPS and NFS. Four (6%) patients had asymptomatic radionecrosis that developed prevalently when lesion diameters were larger and cumulative doses exceeded the values recommended by RTOG 90-05 protocol. About three-fourth of the patients had a good KPS and NFS after reirradiation. CONCLUSIONS: Reirradiation of BM with SRS resulted feasible and effective. A correct patient selection and an accurate evaluation of the cumulative irradiation dose were suggested.

Treatment of recurrent glioblastoma with stereotactic radiotherapy: long-term results of a mono-institutional trial.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Few clinical data exist concerning normal brain tissue tolerance to re-irradiation. The present study evaluated long-term outcome of 22 recurrent glioblastoma patients re-irradiated with radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. METHODS: Twenty-two patients were treated with radiosurgery (13, 59%) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (9, 41%) for 24 lesions of recurrent glioblastoma. The male/female ratio was 14:8, median age 55 years (range, 27-81), and median Karnofsky performance status 90 (range, 70-100). The majority of the cases (77%) was in recursive partitioning analysis classes III or IV Radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy was chosen according to lesion size and location. RESULTS: Median time between primary radiotherapy and re-irradiation was 9 months. Median doses were 17 Gy and 30 Gy, whereas median cumulative normalized total dose was 141 Gy and 98 Gy for radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, respectively. All patients submitted to radiosurgery had a cumulative normalized total dose of more than 100 Gy, whereas only a few (44%) of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy patients had a cumulative normalized total dose exceeding 100 Gy. Median follow-up from re-irradiation was 54 months. At the time of analysis, all patients had died. After re-irradiation, 1 (4%) lesion was in partial remission, 16 (67%) lesions were stable, and the remaining 7 (29%) were in progression. Median duration of response was 6 months, and median survival from re-irradiation 11 months. Three of 13 (23%) patients submitted to radiosurgery developed asymptomatic brain radionecrosis. The cumulative normalized total dose for the 3 patients was 122 Gy, 124 Gy, and 141 Gy, respectively. In one case, the volume of the lesion was large (14 cc), and in the other 2 the interval between the first and second cycle of radiotherapy was short (5 months). CONCLUSIONS: Re-irradiation with radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is feasible and effective in recurrent glioblastoma patients. Apart from the importance of an accurate patient selection, cumulative radiotherapy dose and a correct indication for radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy must be taken into account to avoid brain toxicity.