Chaperonin-mediated protein folding.

Molecular chaperones are required to assist folding of a subset of proteins in Escherichia coli. We describe a conceptual framework for understanding how the GroEL-GroES system assists misfolded proteins to reach their native states. The architecture of GroEL consists of double toroids stacked back-to-back. However, most of the fundamentals of the GroEL action can be described in terms of the single ring. A key idea in our framework is that, with coordinated ATP hydrolysis and GroES binding, GroEL participates actively by repeatedly unfolding the substrate protein (SP), provided that it is trapped in one of the misfolded states. We conjecture that the unfolding of SP becomes possible because a stretching force is transmitted to the SP when the GroEL particle undergoes allosteric transitions. Force-induced unfolding of the SP puts it on a higher free-energy point in the multidimensional energy landscape from which the SP can either reach the native conformation with some probability or be trapped in one of the competing basins of attraction (i.e., the SP undergoes kinetic partitioning). The model shows, in a natural way, that the time scales in the dynamics of the allosteric transitions are intimately coupled to folding rates of the SP. Several scenarios for chaperonin-assisted folding emerge depending on the interplay of the time scales governing the cycle. Further refinement of this framework may be necessary because single molecule experiments indicate that there is a great dispersion in the time scales governing the dynamics of the chaperonin cycle.

Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding.

The ability of the GroEL chaperonin to unfold a protein trapped in a misfolded condition was detected and studied by hydrogen exchange. The GroEL-induced unfolding of its substrate protein is only partial, requires the complete chaperonin system, and is accomplished within the 13 seconds required for a single system turnover. The binding of nucleoside triphosphate provides the energy for a single unfolding event; multiple turnovers require adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis. The substrate protein is released on each turnover even if it has not yet refolded to the native state. These results suggest that GroEL helps partly folded but blocked proteins to fold by causing them first to partially unfold. The structure of GroEL seems well suited to generate the nonspecific mechanical stretching force required for forceful protein unfolding.

GroES in the asymmetric GroEL14-GroES7 complex exchanges via an associative mechanism.

The interaction of the chaperonin GroEL14 with its cochaperonin GroES7 is dynamic, involving stable, asymmetric 1:1 complexes (GroES7.GroEL7-GroEL7) and transient, metastable symmetric 2:1 complexes [GroES7.GroEL7-GroEL7.GroES7]. The transient formation of a 2:1 complex permits exchange of free GroES7 for GroES7 bound in the stable 1:1 complex. Electrophoresis in the presence of ADP was used to resolve free GroEL14 from the GroES7-GroEL14 complex. Titration of GroEL14 with radiolabeled GroES7 to molar ratios of 32:1 demonstrated a 1:1 limiting stoichiometry in a stable complex. No stable 2:1 complex was detected. Preincubation of the asymmetric GroES7.GroEL7-GroEL7 complex with excess unlabeled GroES7 in the presence of ADP demonstrated GroES7 exchange. The rates of GroES7 exchange were proportional to the concentration of unlabeled free GroES7. This concentration dependence points to an associative mechanism in which exchange of GroES7 occurs by way of a transient 2:1 complex and excludes a dissociative mechanism in which exchange occurs by way of free GroEL14. Exchange of radiolabeled ADP from 1:1 complexes was much slower than the exchange of GroES7. In agreement with recent structural studies, this indicates that conformational changes in GroEL14 following the dissociation of GroES7 must precede ADP release. These results explain how the GroEL14 cavity can become reversibly accessible to proteins under in vivo conditions that favor 2:1 complexes.

A thermodynamic coupling mechanism for GroEL-mediated unfolding.

Chaperonins prevent the aggregation of partially folded or misfolded forms of a protein and, thus, keep it competent for productive folding. It was suggested that GroEL, the chaperonin of Escherichia coli, exerts this function 1 unfolding such intermediates, presumably in a catalytic fashion. We investigated the kinetic mechanism of GroEL-induced protein unfolding by using a reduced and carbamidomethylated variant of RNase T1, RCAM-T1, as a substrate. RCAM-T1 cannot fold to completion, because the two disulfide bonds are missing, and it is, thus, a good model for long-lived folding intermediates. RCAM-T1 unfolds when GroEL is added, but GroEL does not change the microscopic rate constant of unfolding, ruling out that it catalyzes unfolding. GroEL unfolds RCAM-T1 because it binds with high affinity to the unfolded form of the protein and thereby shifts the overall equilibrium toward the unfolded state. GroEL can unfold a partially folded or misfolded intermediate by this thermodynamic coupling mechanism when the Gibbs free energy of the binding to GroEL is larger than the conformational stability of the intermediate and when the rate of its unfolding is high.

Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism.

We develop a heuristic model for chaperonin-facilitated protein folding, the iterative annealing mechanism, based on theoretical descriptions of "rugged" conformational free energy landscapes for protein folding, and on experimental evidence that (i) folding proceeds by a nucleation mechanism whereby correct and incorrect nucleation lead to fast and slow folding kinetics, respectively, and (ii) chaperonins optimize the rate and yield of protein folding by an active ATP-dependent process. The chaperonins GroEL and GroES catalyze the folding of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase at a rate proportional to the GroEL concentration. Kinetically trapped folding-incompetent conformers of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase are converted to the native state in a reaction involving multiple rounds of quantized ATP hydrolysis by GroEL. We propose that chaperonins optimize protein folding by an iterative annealing mechanism; they repeatedly bind kinetically trapped conformers, randomly disrupt their structure, and release them in less folded states, allowing substrate proteins multiple opportunities to find pathways leading to the most thermodynamically stable state. By this mechanism, chaperonins greatly expand the range of environmental conditions in which folding to the native state is possible. We suggest that the development of this device for optimizing protein folding was an early and significant evolutionary event.

A quantitative assessment of the role of the chaperonin proteins in protein folding in vivo.

In vitro the chaperonin proteins, GroEL and GroES, facilitate the folding of some other proteins under conditions where that process does not occur spontaneously. Using values drawn from a number of such in vitro studies, together with the known rates of in vivo protein synthesis by Escherichia coli and the known quantities of GroEL and GroES in E. coli, an assessment of the general role of these proteins in protein folding in vivo has been made. Three specific cases are examined, where compelling evidence points to the involvement of the chaperonins; the in vivo folding of the bacteriophage coat protein during the burst phase of phage morphogenesis and of Rubisco during chloroplast development and during expression of recombinant Rubisco in E. coli. In each case the maximum in vitro rates are nearly sufficient to account for the observed in vivo rates of formation of the native protein. However, in general, there appears to be sufficient GroEL and GroES to facilitate the folding of no more than 5% of all of the proteins within E. coli.

Dethiobiotin synthetase: the carbonylation of 7,8-diaminonanoic acid proceeds regiospecifically via the N7-carbamate.

Dethiobiotin synthetase (DTBS) catalyzes the penultimate step in biotin biosynthesis, the formation of the ureido ring of dethiobiotin from (7R,8S)-7,8-diaminononanoic acid (7,8-diaminopelargonic acid, DAPA), CO2, and ATP. Solutions of DAPA at neutral pH readily formed a mixture of the N7- and N8-carbamates in the presence of CO2. However, four lines of evidence together indicated that only the N7-carbamate of DAPA was an intermediate in the reaction catalyzed by DTBS. (1) Addition of diazomethane to mixtures of DAPA and [14C]CO2 yielded a mixture of the N7- and N8-methyl carbamate esters, consistent with carbamate formation in free solution. In the presence of excess DTBS (over DAPA), the ratio of N7:N8-methyl carbamate esters recovered was roughly doubled, suggesting that the enzyme preferentially bound the N7-DAPA-carbamate. (2) Both N7- and N8-DAPA-carbamates were observed directly by 1H and 13C NMR in solutions containing DAPA and [13C]CO2. In the presence of excess DTBS (over DAPA) only one carbamate was observed, showing that carbamate binding to the enzyme was regiospecific. 13C NMR of mixtures containing enzyme, [7-15N]DAPA, and [13C]CO2 showed that the enzyme-bound carbamate was at N7 of DAPA. In addition, pulse-chase experiments showed that the binary complex of DTBS and N7-DAPA-carbamate became kinetically committed upon addition of MgATP. (3) The N7-DAPA-carbamate mimic, 3-(1-aminoethyl)nonanedioic acid, in which the carbamate nitrogen was replaced with a methylene group, cyclized to the corresponding lactam in the presence of DTBS and ATP; ADP and P(i) were also formed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Functional characterization of the higher plant chloroplast chaperonins.

The higher plant chloroplast chaperonins (ch-cpn60 and ch-cpn10) have been purified and their structural/functional properties examined. In all plants surveyed, both proteins were constitutively expressed, and only modest increases in their levels were detected upon heat shock. Like GroEL and GroES of Escherichia coli, the chloroplast chaperonins can physically interact with each other. The asymmetric complexes that form in the presence of ADP are "bullet-shaped" particles that likely consist of 1 mol each of ch-cpn60 and ch-cpn10. The purified ch-cpn60 is a functional molecular chaperone. Under "nonpermissive" conditions, where spontaneous folding was not observed, it was able to assist in the refolding of two different target proteins. In both cases, successful partitioning to the native state also required ATP hydrolysis and chaperonin 10. Surprisingly, however, the "double-domain" ch-cpn10, comprised of unique 21-kDa subunits, was not an obligatory co-chaperonin. Both GroES and a mammalian mitochondrial homolog were equally compatible with the ch-cpn60. Finally, the assisted-folding reaction mediated by the chloroplast chaperonins does not require K+ ions. Thus, the K(+)-dependent ATPase activity that is observed with other known groEL homologs is not a universal property of all chaperonin 60s.

On the distribution of ligands within the asymmetric chaperonin complex, GroEL14.ADP7.GroES7.

In the presence of MgATP or MgADP the E. coli chaperonin proteins, GroEL and GroES, form a stable asymmetric complex with a stoichiometry of two GroEL7:one GroES7: seven MgADP. The distribution of the ligands between the two heptameric GroEL rings is crucial to our understanding of the mechanism of chaperonin-assisted folding, being either cis (i.e. [GroEL7.MgADP7.GroES7]-[GroEL7]) or trans (i.e. [GroEL7.MgADP7]-[GroEL7.GroES7]. On the basis of cross-linking experiments with 8-azido-ATP and the heterobifunctional reagent, N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio) propionate (SPDP), it was suggested that GroES and MgADP are bound to the same GroEL ring which resists proteinase K digestion [Nature 366 (1993) 228-233]. However, we find that the SPDP-promoted cross linking of GroES and GroEL occurs in the absence of Mg2+, ADP or ATP, which are required for the formation of the asymmetric complex. Cross-linking is shown to occur only when the SPDP-modified GroES is co-precipitated with GroEL by trichloracetic acid. Furthermore, there are structural grounds for questioning whether SPDP can crosslink, in a physiologically relevant manner, an amino group of GroES with any of the cysteinyl groups of GroEL.

Stability of the asymmetric Escherichia coli chaperonin complex. Guanidine chloride causes rapid dissociation.

The chaperonin proteins, GroEL14 and GroES7, inhibit protein aggregation and assist in protein folding in a potassium/ATP-dependent manner. In vitro, assays for chaperonin activity typically involve adding a denatured substrate protein to the chaperonins and measuring the appearance of correctly folded substrate protein. The influence of denaturant is generally ignored. Low concentrations of guanidinium chloride (< 100 mM) had a profound effect on the activity/structure of the chaperonins. Guanidinium decreased the ATPase activity of GroEL and attenuated the inhibition of GroEL ATP hydrolysis by GroES. The stable, asymmetric chaperonin complex which forms in the presence of GroES and ADP (GroES7.ADP7.GroEL7-GroEL7) rapidly dissociated upon addition of 80 mM guandinium chloride. Dissociation was enhanced at high ionic strength, but rapid dissociation was guanidinium-specific. Accelerated release of the GroES from the complex was also demonstrated. Unfolded proteins alone had no effect on complex stability. Residual guanidinium depressed the rate of Rhodospirillum rubrum ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco) folding; an increased aggregation rate also decreased the yield of folded Rubisco. Chaperonin-assisted folding is therefore best studied using proteins denatured by means other than guanidinium chloride.

GroES and the chaperonin-assisted protein folding cycle: GroES has no affinity for nucleotides.

The E. coli chaperonin proteins, GroEL and GroES, assist in folding newly synthesized proteins. GroES is necessary for GroEL-assisted folding under conditions where the substrate protein cannot spontaneously fold. On the basis of photolabelling of GroES with 8-azido-ATP, a role for nucleotide binding to GroES in chaperonin function was suggested [Martin, et al., Nature, 366 (1993) 279-282]. We confirm the photolabeling of GroES with 8-azido-ATP. However, other proteins not known to contain nucleotide binding sites also became photolabeled suggesting that labeling is non-specific. Using rigorous physical methods, isothermal calorimetry and equilibrium binding, no interaction between GroES and nucleotides could be detected. We conclude that GroES has no nucleotide binding site.

GroEL structure: a new chapter on assisted folding.

The X-ray structure of GroEL puts future studies on a firm footing, but there's still much work to be done before chaperonin-assisted protein folding is understood.

Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding.

The Escherichia coli chaperonins GroEL and GroES facilitate protein folding in an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent manner. After a single cycle of ATP hydrolysis by the adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) activity of GroEL, the bi-toroidal GroEL formed a stable asymmetric ternary complex with GroES and nucleotide (bulletlike structures). With each subsequent turnover, ATP was hydrolyzed by one ring of GroEL in a quantized manner, completely releasing the adenosine diphosphate and GroES that were tightly bound to the other ring as a result of the previous turnover. The catalytic cycle involved formation of a symmetric complex (football-like structures) as an intermediate that accumulated before the rate-determining hydrolytic step. After one to two cycles, most of the substrate protein dissociated still in a nonnative state, which is consistent with intermolecular transfer of the substrate protein between toroids of high and low affinity. A unifying model for chaperonin-facilitated protein folding based on successive rounds of binding and release, and partitioning between committed and kinetically trapped intermediates, is proposed.

On the role of groES in the chaperonin-assisted folding reaction. Three case studies.

The mechanism by which correctly folded proteins are recovered from stable complexes with groEL is not well understood. Certain target proteins require ATP and groES, while others seemingly dispense with the cochaperonin. Here, we examine the chaperonin-assisted folding of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase, malate dehydrogenase, and citrate synthase, three proteins that are believed to require both chaperonin components for successful reactivation. Surprisingly, in all cases, the need for groES depended on the folding environment. Under "non-permissive" conditions, where unassisted spontaneous folding could not occur, reactivation to the native state required the complete chaperonin system (e.g. groEL, groES, and MgATP). However, under "permissive" conditions where spontaneous folding could occur groES was no longer mandatory. Instead, upon the addition of ATP alone, all three target proteins could be released from groEL, in a form that was capable of reaching the native state. In the permissive setting, groES merely accelerated the rate of the ATP-dependent release process. The results suggest that the incompletely folded protein species that are released from groEL, in the absence of groES, are not necessarily committed to the native state. Similar to the unassisted folding reaction, they still partition between productive and unproductive folding pathways in an environment-dependent manner. It follows that the mechanistic contribution of the co-chaperonin, groES, and its physiological significance in cellular protein folding, could be entirely missed in a permissive in vitro environment.

Plurality of protein conformations of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase monomers probed by high pressure electrophoresis.

We used hydrostatic pressure in the range of 1 to 2 kbar, coupled with polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, to investigate the properties of monomers of dimeric ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. At temperatures below -5 degrees C or pressures above 1.5 kbar, only a diffuse band with low electrophoretic mobility was observed, which is assigned to a denatured monomer. In gels run at 1.0 kbar and temperatures above 0 degree C, both the wild type and a mutant in which a positively charged Lys at the dimer interface is replaced by a negatively charged glutamic acid displayed several discrete bands with retardation coefficients larger than that of the dimer. Cross-linking due to oxidation of cysteines was not the reason for the multiplicity of bands, which in addition were independent on the length of the electrophoretic run in the range of 1-3 h. Binding of 1,1'-bis(4-anilino)naphthalene-5,5'-disulfonic acid to the pressure dissociated monomers stabilized the unfolded conformations. We propose that the dissociated monomers adopt various expanded conformations, which, under the experimental conditions, are stabilized to the extent necessary to be considered as distinct chemical species. Gel filtration high performance liquid chromatography analysis of bands eluted from nonstained gels run at 1 kbar (15 degrees C) and 1.5 kbar (-5 degrees C), respectively, was performed. In both cases the dimeric structure was fully recovered, along with the spectroscopic properties and catalytic activity characteristic of the native dimer, indicating that the unresolved unfolded conformers that appear at -5 degrees C, as well as the set of discrete conformers obtained at 15 degrees C, are able to reconstitute a single active conformation on reassociation.

Identification and functional analysis of chaperonin 10, the groES homolog from yeast mitochondria.

Chaperonin 60 (cpn60) and chaperonin 10 (cpn10) constitute the chaperonin system in prokaryotes, mitochondria, and chloroplasts. In Escherichia coli, these two chaperonins are also termed groEL and groES. We have used a functional assay to identify the groES homolog cpn10 in yeast mitochondria. When dimeric ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco) is denatured and allowed to bind to yeast cpn60, subsequent refolding of Rubisco is strictly dependent upon yeast cpn10. The heterologous combination of cpn60 from E. coli plus yeast cpn10 is also functional. In contrast, yeast cpn60 plus E. coli cpn10 do not support refolding of Rubisco. In the presence of MgATP, yeast cpn60 and yeast cpn10 form a stable complex that can be isolated by gel filtration and that facilitates refolding of denatured Rubisco. Although the potassium-dependent ATPase activity of E. coli cpn60 can be inhibited by cpn10 from either E. coli or yeast, neither of these cpn10s inhibits the ATPase activity of yeast cpn60. Amino acid sequencing of yeast cpn10 reveals substantial similarity to the corresponding cpn10 proteins from rat mitochondria and prokaryotes.