Detachment of retinal pigment epithelium in retinopathy due to malaria. / Desprendimiento del epitelio pigmentario de la retina en la retinopatía por malaria.

CASE REPORT: A 45-year-old man was diagnosed with malaria with neurological involvement. Two months later he referred metamorphopsia in the left eye. Malarial retinopathy was observed in the fundus examination. The Optic Coherence Tomography (OCT) of the macula showed parafoveal pigment epithelium detachment (DEP). Specific anti-malarial treatment was initiated, with the disappearance of the retinopathy being observed. DISCUSSION: Plasmodium falciparum is responsible for the retinopathy in neurological malaria. A funduscopic examination and macular OCT should be performed in these patients, as it is associated with a higher mortality when there is a retinal involvement.

MEK Retinopathy. Clinical case reports. / Retinopatía MEK. Casos clínicos.

CASE REPORTS: Three clinical cases are presented of MEK retinopathy associated with the combination of cobimetinib and vemurafenib characterised by alteration of the retinal pigment epithelium and neurosensory detachment. Two of the cases conserved the vision of the unit, and the third developed a large bilateral neurosensory detachment with final visual acuity of 0.6 for the right eye and 0.1 for the left one. DISCUSSION: The new therapeutic strategies against metastatic cutaneous melanoma condition the appearance of alterations of the pigmentary epithelium of the retina with serous detachments, leading to close monitoring with macular optical coherence tomography.

Genetic variant of Stickler's syndrome. / Variante genética del síndrome de Stickler.

CASES REPORTS: Three myopic components of a same family came for study because presented severely degraded vitreous, equatorial membranes, retinal pigment epithelium hyperplasia, vascular sheathed and sclerosis of peripheral predominance. A genetic study confirmed the diagnosis of Stickler syndrome with a variant in the mutation of the COL2A1 gene. DISCUSSION: Stickler's syndrome should be suspected in families with a characteristic phenotype with vitreous syneresis and alterations in the retina, but there may be genetic variants that do not express the classic phenotype.

Dome shaped macula associated with myopic retinochoroidosis. Use of spironolactone. / Mácula en cúpula asociada a la retinocoroidosis miópica. Utilidad de la espironolactona.

CASES REPORTS: The cases are presented of three women of 22, 36 and 55 years old with bilateral myopic retinochoroidosis. They had unilateral decreased visual acuity, normal bilateral tonometry, and biomicroscopy. Funduscopy showed bilateral and unilateral myopic maculopathy, and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) showed a dome shaped macula with neurosensory detachment. Treatment was started with spironolactone and an improvement by OCT was shown in all cases. DISCUSSION: The etiopathogenic mechanism of the dome shaped macula is discussed. OCT demonstrated to be the fundamental test in the follow-up of this condition. After the evidence shown, initial treatment with spironolactone is suggested.

Spironolactone, a therapeutic alternative in the treatment of diffuse retinal pigment epitheliopathy. / Espironolactona, alternativa terapéutica en el tratamiento de la epiteliopatía difusa crónica.

CASE REPORT: Two cases are presented of patients with chronic diffuse epitheliopathy (CDE) that showed a favourable response when treated with spironolactone. The first patient had regions of neurosensory detachment (DNS) and the second, multiple DNS, secondary intra-retinal cysts and retinal pigment epithelium detachment. DISCUSSION: After treatment with spironolactone, both patients showed a visual acuity improvement and structural changes (reduced neurosensory retinal detachment and cystoid degeneration). Aldosterone receptor agonists (ARA) used for persistent forms of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy show encouraging results and could represent a therapeutic alternative for CDE.

Sarcoidosis. Debut as orbital pseudotumour.

CASE REPORT: 78 year-old female patient being investigated for a left orbital pseudotumour of 17 days onset. She had proptosis, pain, with no limitation of eye movements, periorbital oedema, and upper eyelid ptosis, compatible with an orbital pseudotumour. The MRI showed an upper outer left orbital mass adjacent to the side of eyeball and an increase in soft tissue at the level of lacrimal gland. The histopathology study of an eyelid lesion demonstrated the presence of non-caseating granulomas. DISCUSSION: A definitive diagnosis of orbital sarcoidosis was made. Oral treatment with corticosteroids and methotrexate achieved gradual control of the disease.

Resultados coste-efectividad del implante de dexametasona en edema macular / A cost-effectiveness study of dexamethasone implants in macular edema

OBJETIVO: Analizar el beneficio coste-efectividad del implante intravítreo de dexametasona (Ozurdex®, Allergan, Irvine, CA, EE. UU.) en sus aplicaciones clínicamente relevantes. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Un total de 88 ojos de 86 pacientes con edema macular de > 300 μm medido mediante tomografía de coherencia óptica (Zeiss Cirrus, Dublín, CA, EE. UU.) fueron incluidos en este trabajo retrospectivo de 2 años, con un seguimiento mínimo de 6 meses. Se incluyeron 3 grupos de pacientes: el grupo 1 con edema macular en oclusión venosa retiniana, el grupo 2 con uveítis posterior no infecciosa y el grupo 3 con edema macular diabético, estando este fuera de indicación pero avalado por la literatura médica. Antes del implante y los días 1, 30, 60, 90 y 180 se evaluó la agudeza visual corregida (Snellen), espesor retiniano central, presión intraocular y biomicroscopia. Los análisis de coste-beneficio se tabularon por línea de visión ganada, comparando las principales alternativas terapéuticas, y se valoró el perfil de seguridad del implante intravítreo de dexametasona (Ozurdex®; Allergan, Irvine, CA, EE. UU.). RESULTADOS: Los resultados de este estudio no difirieron de los publicados por otros, en términos de mejoría de la agudeza visual en el 63,3% y del espesor macular central en el 97%. En los casos de recidiva, se produjo a los 120 días de media; la necesidad de retratamiento fue del 40,9%. Entre los efectos secundarios, el incremento de presión intraocular > 23 mm Hg se produjo en el 29,54%, controlándose con tratamiento tópico, excepto un 1,13% de los casos que requirieron tratamiento quirúrgico. El desarrollo de catarata fue del 44,7%, requiriendo cirugía un 10,6%. Los resultados del tratamiento mostraron una menor necesidad en la frecuencia del uso de Ozurdex® frente a otros tratamientos para el control de la enfermedad, convirtiéndose en una opción que permite el ahorro de costes. DISCUSIÓN: Los análisis coste-efectividad son clínicamente relevantes cuando se aplican estrategias terapéuticas en pacientes con edema macular. El implante de dexametasona intravítrea es una opción terapéutica segura y eficiente

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost-effectiveness and benefits of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®, Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA.) in its clinically relevant applications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 88 eyes of 86 patients with macular edema of > 300 μm measured by optical coherence tomography (Cirrus Zeiss, Dublin, CA, USA) were included in this two-year retrospective study, with a minimum of 6 months follow-up. The patients were divide into 3 groups: group 1 with macular edema in retinal vein occlusion, group 2 with non-infectious posterior uveitis, and group 3 with diabetic macular edema. The treatment was off-label but supported by the literature. Before implantation, and on days 1, 30, 60, 90 and 180, corrected visual acuity (Snellen), central retinal thickness, intraocular pressure and biomicroscopy were evaluated. The cost-benefit analysis was tabulated by line of visual acuity gained, comparing the main therapeutic alternatives and assessment of the safety profile of the dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®, Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA). RESULTS: The results of this study did not differ from the published studies, in terms of visual acuity improvement in 63.3% of cases, and with central macular thickness improvement in 97% of cases. There were relapses, which occurred after 120 days on average, and the need for retreatment was 40.9%. Increased intraocular pressure >23 mm Hg was among the side effects in 29.54%, and was controlled with topical treatment, except in 1.13% requiring surgical treatment. The development of cataract was 44.7%, and 10.6% required surgery. Treatment results showed less frequent use of Ozurdex® than other treatments for disease control, being a cost saving option. DISCUSSION: Cost-effectiveness analyses are clinically relevant when applying treatment strategies in patients with macular edema. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant appears to be a safe and efficient therapy

[A cost-effectiveness study of dexamethasone implants in macular edema]. / Resultados coste-efectividad del implante de dexametasona en edema macular.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost-effectiveness and benefits of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®, Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA.) in its clinically relevant applications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 88 eyes of 86 patients with macular edema of > 300 µm measured by optical coherence tomography (Cirrus Zeiss, Dublin, CA, USA) were included in this two-year retrospective study, with a minimum of 6 months follow-up. The patients were divide into 3 groups: group 1 with macular edema in retinal vein occlusion, group 2 with non-infectious posterior uveitis, and group 3 with diabetic macular edema. The treatment was off-label but supported by the literature. Before implantation, and on days 1, 30, 60, 90 and 180, corrected visual acuity (Snellen), central retinal thickness, intraocular pressure and biomicroscopy were evaluated. The cost-benefit analysis was tabulated by line of visual acuity gained, comparing the main therapeutic alternatives and assessment of the safety profile of the dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®, Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA). RESULTS: The results of this study did not differ from the published studies, in terms of visual acuity improvement in 63.3% of cases, and with central macular thickness improvement in 97% of cases. There were relapses, which occurred after 120 days on average, and the need for retreatment was 40.9%. Increased intraocular pressure >23 mm Hg was among the side effects in 29.54%, and was controlled with topical treatment, except in 1.13% requiring surgical treatment. The development of cataract was 44.7%, and 10.6% required surgery. Treatment results showed less frequent use of Ozurdex® than other treatments for disease control, being a cost saving option. DISCUSSION: Cost-effectiveness analyses are clinically relevant when applying treatment strategies in patients with macular edema. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant appears to be a safe and efficient therapy.