Efficacy of fluconazole prophylaxis for prevention of invasive fungal infection in extremely low birth weight infants.

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are an important cause of late-onset disease in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Despite prior trials of fluconazole prophylaxis in neonates, application of this regimen remains controversial. Review of our neonatal intensive care unit aggregate annual number of fungal isolates from sterile sites in ELBW infants from 1997 to 2006 suggested a significant decrease following the institution of routine prophylactic fluconazole in February 2002. We undertook a retrospective study to document the efficacy and adverse effects of routine fluconazole prophylaxis. METHODS: ELBW infants admitted during 2000 to 2006 were divided into 2 groups: Control group-admitted before the institution of fluconazole prophylaxis, and Fluconazole group-admitted after institution of fluconazole prophylaxis. Primary outcome was the frequency of IFI. Secondary outcome was the frequency of cholestasis, which has been rarely reported with fluconazole use. RESULTS: Data were extracted from 262 infant records: control 99, fluconazole 163. Baseline demographics and potentially confounding variables differed between the 2 groups with greater birth weight, greater gestational age, shorter durations of ventilation and central catheter use, and earlier start of feeding in the control group, reflecting healthier control infants. Frequency of IFI was 7.1% in the control group versus 1.8% in the fluconazole group, P = 0.045. Logistic regression revealed that fluconazole prophylaxis was independently associated with a lower risk of IFI. There was no difference in the frequency of cholestasis between the control and fluconazole groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic administration of fluconazole to all ELBW infants was associated with significantly decreased rates of IFI without associated adverse effects.

Office management of pediatric primary nocturnal enuresis: a comparison of physician advised and parent chosen alternative treatment outcomes.

PURPOSE: We compared the remission of pediatric primary nocturnal enuresis in groups of children who used a physician advised practice plan vs a parent chosen alternative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2004 and January 2006 there were 119 patients with primary nocturnal enuresis enrolled in this prospective, nonrandomized study. For this study primary nocturnal enuresis was defined as wetting at night during sleep during any 6-month interval without any known causative problem. A total of 76 children received the physician advised treatment plan and used an alarm, oxybutynin, desmopressin, an elimination diet and a bowel program, as indicated. A total of 43 children received a parent chosen alternative treatment plan, which consisted of any single or combination of treatments involving an alarm, oxybutynin, desmopressin and an elimination diet or bowel program. Parents from each group completed an intake survey that measured functional bladder capacity using a 3-day home diary and they identified demographic variables. Followup occurred at 2 weeks and then monthly for 12 weeks to study end. RESULTS: We found that the probability of remission by the end of the study for the physician advised treatment group was significantly higher than that of the parent choice group (88% vs 29%, Kaplan-Meier curve p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The group of children who followed physician advised treatment for primary nocturnal enuresis showed significantly earlier remission of primary nocturnal enuresis than children who followed the parent choice treatment (25th percentile 2 vs 10 weeks).