Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Chemosphere ; 360: 142409, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782135

ABSTRACT

This study explored the effect stage number and plant type have on ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) removal kinetics in a two-stage pilot-scale vertical flow constructed wetland (VFCW) system treating landfill leachate. Half of the VFCW columns were planted with Typha latifolia and the other half Scirpus californicus, and half of the columns were loaded with municipal solid waste landfill leachate (diluted to 1 part leachate to 2 parts total) with the effluent from these columns was collected in two separate barrels. The remaining columns were loaded with the effluent collected from the first columns, creating a two-stage VFCW system with four unique pairs to be tested. The leachate used here experienced no prior pre-treatment, and average influent concentrations of NH3-N for the first- and second-stage VFCWs were 508 and 321 mg L-1, respectively- much higher than many other VFCW treatment systems. Some reduction in chemical oxygen demand was observed, as well as generation of nitrate and nitrite, evidence of nitrification. No apparent correlation between aboveground biomass and removal of NH3-N was observed. Overall removal efficiency of NH3-N through two stages of VFCWs was 53.7% for columns planted with T. latifolia and 58.3% for those planted with S. Californicus. Average NH3-N removal efficiencies for the first stage VFCWs were 32.7% and 34.3%, while those in the second stage were 31.3% and 36.5%; no significant difference was observed between the first and second stage, suggesting that stage number does not have a significant effect on the removal efficiency of NH3-N in the primary treatment of landfill leachate via VFCWs. However, average mass removal rates of NH3-N in the first stage were 166 and 175 mg L-1 d-1; the second stage was significantly lower at 99.4 and 112 mg L-1 d-1, indicating that the first stage removed more pollutants overall.


Subject(s)
Ammonia , Nitrogen , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Wetlands , Ammonia/chemistry , Kinetics , Waste Disposal, Fluid/methods , Pilot Projects , Biodegradation, Environmental , Typhaceae/metabolism , Cyperaceae/metabolism , Biological Oxygen Demand Analysis , Nitrification , Waste Disposal Facilities , Biomass
2.
Sci Total Environ ; 928: 172430, 2024 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38621546

ABSTRACT

In recent years, soil screening levels have been adopted by regulatory agencies for certain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to assess the risk of groundwater contamination through leaching. These soil screening levels, determined using an established equilibrium-based partitioning equation, have high variability among regulatory groups largely attributed to the diverse reported partitioning coefficients in the literature. This variability between reported partitioning coefficients, and subsequently soil screening levels, is due to the complex leaching behavior of PFAS not being predicted well by the standard equilibrium-based model. This has led one regulatory group to require batch leaching to assess risk rather than setting default soil screening levels based on partitioning equations. In this work, we conducted leaching experiments on five field-sampled soils impacted by aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF), following Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework (LEAF) Method 1316 and compared the results to expected leaching utilizing an equilibrium-based partitioning equation commonly employed by regulatory agencies to establish soil screening levels. Our analysis found among the six PFAS detected in the soils, which have regulatory leaching thresholds established, the partitioning values assumed by the U.S. EPA exhibited the highest accuracy in predicting leachate concentrations. These partitioning values predicted actual leaching within a ± 20 % margin of error for approximately 50 % of sample points, highlighting limitations in relying solely on equilibrium-based partitioning values as predictors of leaching behavior. This discrepancy between predicted and actual leaching has implications for site managers and regulatory entities overseeing PFAS-contaminated sites, suggesting that soil screening level determinations for PFAS might need to be revised to account for the unique transport characteristics of PFAS.

3.
Waste Manag ; 161: 187-192, 2023 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36893712

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the behavior of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in multiple pilot-scale vertical flow constructed wetlands (VFCW) treating landfill leachate. Eight pilot-scale VFCW columns planted with Typha latifolia or Scirpus Californicus were fed untreated municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill leachate that was diluted with potable water at a 1:10 ratio (1 part leachate to 10 parts total) at a fixed daily hydraulic loading rate of 0.525 m d-1. Ninety-two PFAS were examined and 18 PFAS were detected at quantifiable concentrations (7 precursor species and 11 terminal species). The average concentration of Σ92 PFAS in the influent was 3,100 ng L-1, which corresponded with minimal reduction in the effluents from the four VFCW (decreases ranged from 1% to 12% on average for Σ18 PFAS); however, precursors 6:3 FTCA, 7:3 FTCA, N-MeFOSAA, and N-EtFOSAA concentrations decreased significantly in the VFCW effluents, and significant decreases in the concentrations of these PFAA-precursors were concurrent with a significant increase in concentrations of five PFAAs (PFBA, PFNA, PFBS, PFOS, and PFOSI). This trend indicates that from a regulatory perspective, standalone VFCWs are likely to produce an apparent PFAS increase, which may also be true for many other leachate treatment processes incorporating aerobic biological treatment. Additional treatment to address PFAS should be integrated prior to the use of any system, including VFCWs, for the treatment of constituents of concern in MSW landfill leachate.


Subject(s)
Fluorocarbons , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Wetlands , Solid Waste , Fluorocarbons/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...