High-resolution MRI vs multislice spiral CT: which technique depicts the trabecular bone structure best?

The purpose of this study was to compare trabecular bone structure parameters obtained from high-resolution magnetic resonance (HRMR) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) images with those determined in contact radiographs from corresponding specimen sections. High-resolution MR and MSCT images were obtained in 39 distal radius specimens. For HRMR the in-plane spatial resolution was 0.152x0.153 mm(2) with a slice thickness of 0.9 and 0.3 mm using a 3D T1-weighted spin-echo sequence. For MSCT the resolution was 0.247x0.247 mm(2) with a collimation of 1 mm. Using a diamond saw, 117 0.9- to 1-mm-thick sections were obtained from these specimens and contact radiographs were acquired. In the corresponding sections structure parameters analogous to bone histomorphometry were determined. Significant correlations between MR- and CT-derived structure parameters and those derived from the contact radiographs were found (p<0.01); r values of up to 0.75 were obtained for HRMR imaging and up to 0.70 for MSCT. On the average, structure parameters showed higher correlations for the MR- than for the CT-derived data. For the MR data the threshold algorithm used for binarizing the images substantially affected these correlations. In conclusion, trabecular bone structure parameters assessed in distal radius HRMR and MSCT images are significantly correlated with those determined in corresponding specimen sections (p<0.01). High-resolution MR-derived structure parameters, however, performed better in the prediction of trabecular bone structure.

Local differences in the trabecular bone structure of the proximal femur depicted with high-spatial-resolution MR imaging and multisection CT.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors performed this study to investigate structural variations in the trabecular bone of the proximal femur at high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and high-resolution multisection computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in 36 proximal human femur specimens by using dual x-ray absorptiometry. High-resolution MR imaging was performed at 1.5 T with an in-plane spatial resolution of 0.195 x 0.195 mm and a section thickness of 0.3 and 0.9 mm. Multisection CT was performed with an ultra-high-resolution protocol; images were obtained with an in-plane spatial resolution of 0.25 mm and a section thickness of 1 mm. In a subset of these specimens, micro CT was performed with an isotropic spatial resolution of 30 microm. Identical regions of interest (ROIs) were used to analyze images obtained with MR imaging, multisection CT, and micro CT. Trabecular bone structural parameters were obtained, and the parameters from the individual imaging modalities and BMD were correlated. RESULTS: Significant differences concerning the trabecular microarchitecture between the individual ROIs were demonstrated with multisection CT and MR imaging. A number of the correlations between structural parameters derived with multisection CT, MR imaging, micro CT, and BMD measurements were significant. For MR imaging, threshold technique and section thickness had an effect on structural parameters. CONCLUSION: Structural parameters obtained in the proximal femur with multisection CT and high-resolution MR imaging show regional differences. These techniques may be useful for depicting the trabecular architecture in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.