Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 26(10): 1361-70, 2007 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17983368

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient acceptance of bowel preparation can affect colon cancer screening compliance. Aim To compare patient acceptance, preference and tolerability of 32-sodium phosphate tablets vs. 2L polyethylene glycol solution plus 4 bisacodyl tablets for bowel preparation. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicentre trial was performed. Results were based on responses to a patient questionnaire. RESULTS: 411 patients (205 sodium phosphate; 206 polyethylene glycol plus bisacodyl) completed the study preparation and patient questionnaire prior to colonoscopy. More patients receiving sodium phosphate vs. polyethylene glycol plus bisacodyl found it easy to take (77% vs. 42%), reported it to be without taste (47% vs. 6%), found it easy to take with respect to volume of liquid prescribed (72% vs. 27%) and indicated they would take the same preparation again in the future (96% vs. 74%, P < 0.0001 for all). Fewer patients receiving sodium phosphate vs. polyethylene glycol plus bisacodyl had to take time off work or change ordinary activities to take the study preparation (18% vs. 52%, P < 0.0001). Nausea, vomiting, bloating and abdominal pain were reported less frequently with sodium phosphate (P < 0.0013). CONCLUSION: The 32-tablet sodium phosphate dosing regimen was easier to take and better tolerated, when compared to 2L polyethylene glycol plus bisacodyl tablets for bowel preparation.


Subject(s)
Bisacodyl/administration & dosage , Cathartics/administration & dosage , Drug Carriers/administration & dosage , Phosphates/administration & dosage , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bisacodyl/adverse effects , Cathartics/adverse effects , Colonic Diseases/surgery , Colonoscopy/methods , Drug Carriers/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Phosphates/adverse effects , Polyethylene Glycols/adverse effects , Preoperative Care/methods , Treatment Outcome
2.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 79(6): 615-24, 1998 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9630138

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare employment outcomes after spinal cord injury (SCI) as a function of several important participant characteristics. DESIGN: Field study survey of the employment history of two large samples of people with SCI. Outcomes were compared as a function of multiple participant characteristics. SETTING: A large rehabilitation hospital in the Southeast, with the collaboration of two Midwestern hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand thirty-two individuals with SCI, 597 from the Southeast and 435 from the Midwest. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Life Situation Questionnaire-revised (LSQ-R), a self-report measure, was used to identify biographic status and to document employment history. RESULTS: On the average, currently employed participants were Caucasian, were younger when injured, had paraplegia, and had completed more years of education. Geographic differences in employment rates disappeared when controlled for multiple factors, including years of education. However, even after controlling for years of education, Caucasian participants were 2.8 times more likely than minority participants to be working at the time of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation professionals need to find creative means to identify and neutralize barriers to employment among individuals from minority groups and to identify meaningful avocations for individuals who are injured when they are near retirement.


Subject(s)
Employment/statistics & numerical data , Residence Characteristics , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitation , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Midwestern United States , Minority Groups , Racial Groups , Sex Factors , Southeastern United States , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 78(8): 815-21, 1997 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9344299

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify the relative risk of mortality after spinal cord injury (SCI) as a function of level of psychosocial, vocational, and medical adjustment. DESIGN: A prospective design was used: data on life adjustment was obtained at one time (1985), with subsequent survival status ascertained 11 years later (1996). Logistic regression was used to identify the relative risk of mortality given the level of adjustment on a number of predictor variables. SETTING: All participants were selected from outpatient files of a Midwestern university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 345 participants with SCI completed study materials in 1985 (a 78% response rate), 330 of whom could be definitively classified in 1996 as either survivor or deceased. Of these 330 participants, 84% were alive in 1996 (n = 278) and the other 16% were deceased (n = 52). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The Life Situation Questionnaire (LSQ) was used to measure nine primary predictors related to life adjustment after SCI, including employment status and eight predictor scales: Medical Instability, Adjustment, General Satisfaction, Emotional Distress, Dependency, and Poor Health. The LSQ was also used to generate data on 34 individual items that were used in exploratory predictive analyses. RESULTS: All but one of the 8 primary adjustment predictors from 1985 significantly predicted 1996 mortality status. Dependency and low overall satisfaction were among the most significant predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Overall quality of life is important to the longevity of people with SCI, and comprehensive rehabilitation programs are needed to promote a level of life adjustment that maximizes longevity after SCI.


Subject(s)
Spinal Cord Injuries/mortality , Activities of Daily Living , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Personal Satisfaction , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Risk , Social Adjustment , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survival Analysis
4.
5.
Arch Intern Med ; 149(6): 1350-3, 1989 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2471472

ABSTRACT

To test the effect of trimethoprim (an antibiotic commonly administered with sulfamethoxazole) on the disposition of the antiarrhythmic procainamide hydrochloride and its active metabolite N-acetylprocainamide, 10 healthy men received 1 g of procainamide hydrochloride orally on two occasions, coadministered with placebo or trimethoprim (100 mg twice a day for 2 days before and then 200 mg with the procainamide dose). Trimethoprim decreased the mean (+/- SD) renal clearance by 45% after the dose of procainamide was administered (487 +/- 129 vs 267 +/- 123 mL/min) and that of N-acetylprocainamide by 26% (275 +/- 78 vs 192 +/- 82 mL/min) compared with placebo. The mean area under plasma concentration--time curve 0 to 12 hours after dosing increased 39% for procainamide (19.8 +/- 4.8 vs 27.6 +/- 7.2 mg.h/L) and 27% for N-acetylprocainamide (9.1 +/- 2.1 vs 11.4 +/- 2.8 mg.h/L). The corrected QT electrocardiographic interval at 2 hours after the procainamide dose was 0.40 +/- 0.02 second with placebo and 0.43 +/- 0.03 second with trimethoprim. Trimethoprim may increase procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide plasma concentrations, resulting in increased pharmacodynamic response apparently caused by the competition for renal tubular cationic secretion.


Subject(s)
Acecainide/pharmacokinetics , Procainamide/analogs & derivatives , Procainamide/pharmacokinetics , Trimethoprim/pharmacology , Adult , Drug Interactions , Electrocardiography , Humans , Kidney/metabolism , Male , Metabolic Clearance Rate/drug effects , Random Allocation , Reference Values
6.
Clin Ther ; 10(5): 543-52, 1988.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2856597

ABSTRACT

In a multicenter, single-blind, randomized trial, the effectiveness in pain relief and healing of three regimens of H2-receptor antagonists was compared in 338 patients with endoscopically confirmed active duodenal ulcers, 112 receiving cimetidine 300 mg four times daily (QID), 110 receiving cimetidine 800 mg at bedtime (HS), and 116 receiving ranitidine 300 mg HS. Evaluation of the immediate symptomatic response during the first 24 hours of therapy showed that a greater proportion of patients with nighttime pain were improved on HS regimen and a greater portion of patients with daytime pain were improved on QID regimen. With continued treatment the differences between a once-daily and a four-times-daily regimen disappeared and the HS regimen provided as much daytime pain relief as the QID regimen. For the two once-daily regimens where ranitidine and cimetidine were directly compared, a greater proportion of patients on cimetidine 800 mg HS had an immediate symptomatic improvement than on ranitidine 300 mg HS. When those who smoked were evaluated separately this difference was also evident. During the first 24 hours, a total of 68% of the smokers in the cimetidine HS treatment groups had improvement in daytime pain versus 44% of patients in the ranitidine group at day one. Nighttime pain relief in smokers on day one was apparent in 78% of the patients receiving the cimetidine HS regimen, in contrast to 67% of ranitidine-HS-treated patients. At the completion of a four-week course of treatment, both physicians' and patients' global assessments of the reduction in the severity and frequency of ulcer-related symptoms significantly favored cimetidine HS over ranitidine HS. These results after four weeks of treatment were corroborated by the endoscopy data, which showed 71% of patients in the cimetidine HS group were healed, compared with 63% in the ranitidine HS group. The 300 mg QID cimetidine regimen produced a 69% healing rate. For those patients whose ulcers were unhealed by the end of four weeks of treatment, a further course of treatment produced almost 9C% healing in all treatment groups and symptomatic relief in virtually all patients. None of the regimens was associated with unexpected adverse effects and all patients tolerated the treatments well. The results of this study confirm the efficacy and safety of single bedtime doses of cimetidine or ranitidine, as well as the four-times-daily cimetidine regimen, in the acute treatment of duodenal ulcers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Cimetidine/therapeutic use , Duodenal Ulcer/drug therapy , Pain/drug therapy , Ranitidine/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cimetidine/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Duodenal Ulcer/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/etiology , Ranitidine/adverse effects , Single-Blind Method
7.
Am J Nephrol ; 7(5): 355-9, 1987.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3324762

ABSTRACT

A 41-year-old man with combined renal and hepatic dysfunction was noted to have marked elevations in serum digoxin concentration subsequent to the discontinuation of digoxin therapy. These elevations (peak value 8.6 ng/ml), as measured by both radioimmunoassay and fluorescence polarization immunoassay, were not associated with electrocardiographic evidence of digitalis toxicity. Using a combined high-performance liquid chromatography/radioimmunoassay, accumulation and immunoassay cross-reactivity of conjugates of digoxigenin monodigitoxoside (cardioinactive metabolites of digoxin) were found to be the basis of the observed false elevation in digoxin concentration.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Hemorrhage/therapy , Digoxin/blood , Acute Kidney Injury/blood , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Adult , Cerebral Hemorrhage/blood , Cerebral Hemorrhage/complications , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Cross Reactions , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , False Positive Reactions , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Humans , Hypertension/blood , Hypertension/drug therapy , Immunoassay/methods , Liver Diseases/blood , Male , Radioimmunoassay/methods , Renal Dialysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...