[Sexual and gender diversity and care for older people-intersectional perspectives and the relevance of situations and contexts]. / Sexuelle und geschlechtliche Vielfalt in der Altenhilfe ­ Intersektionale Perspektiven und die Relevanz von Situationen und Kontexten.

BACKGROUND: There have been relatively few studies concerning gender and sexual identity in research on ageing and nursing or care. Non-heterosexual older people and those in need of care describe fears of rejection and the dependence on third parties in their use of health and social care services in old age. OBJECTIVE: This article examines the question of how gender and sexual diversity can be respected in older adult social services. It focuses on the question of how sexual and gender identity become relevant in particular contexts and how these categories interact with other categories of identity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Qualitative data from the same sex and nursing in old age (GLEPA) research project with older lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans*and inter* (LGBTI*) people in need of care or help are used. For the analysis, biographical case reconstructions are combined with an intersectional perspective. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The analysis of the data shows how sexual and gender identities of older LGBTI* people are represented in differing contexts and depend on their experiences across the course of life. It also shows how specific strategies associated with these identity categories are developed and can be distinguished. Particularly in the act of personal care, the interplay between age, body and gender identity shows how the interviewees experience the normative and sometimes violent, structures of long-term care. Regarding sexual identity, the data show the continuing relevance of life situations and lifestyles for LGBTI* people into old age, demonstrating the importance of taking an intersectional perspective for person-centered care with older adults.

A German-Israeli comparison of informal and formal service use among aged 75+.

The paper focuses on filial norms and attitudes of older people about the care system of welfare states. It is a further investigation of the OASIS cross national study and examines three questions: First, what do older people in Israel and Germany consider to be the proper balance between the family and the welfare state regarding elder care? Second, what are the responsibilities of the family, the welfare state and other caregivers? Third, in what way do values, filial norms and personal resources relate to actual service use? The empirical data is based on information gathered from respondents living in Israel and Germany, aged 75+. The results of the study indicate that familial help has not been fully replaced by welfare state services. These findings support the complementary perspective. The results also show that most respondents favour a shared responsibility between the welfare state and the family. The findings indicate that familial norms are stable and strong as expressed by elders in both countries. The health situation is the main factor for receiving welfare services and familial help in Israel. In Germany the strong effect of living alone for receipt of welfare services underscores the influence of older adults' social and personal resources on actual service use. The article discusses the findings referring to the importance of a combined mix of the different sources of help for social policy implications.