Anticipation or avoidance: internal medicine resident experiences performing invasive bedside procedures.

Background: Internal Medicine (IM) residents are required to perform bedside procedures for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Residents' experiences with procedures vary widely, for unclear reasons. Objective: To explore IM residents' experiences with performing bedside procedures and to identify barriers and facilitators to obtaining sufficient experience. Methods: Using an inductive, thematic approach, we conducted five individual semi-structured interviews and one focus group with seven IM residents (12 residents in total) during the 2017-2018 academic year at a Canadian tertiary care centre. We used iterative, open-ended questions to elicit residents' experiences, and barriers and facilitators, to performing bedside procedures. Transcripts were analyzed for themes using Braun and Clarke's method. Results: We identified four themes 1) Patient-specific factors such as body habitus and procedure urgency; 2) Systems factors such as time constraints and accessibility of materials; 3) Faculty factors including availability to supervise, comfort level, and referral preferences, and 4) Resident-specific factors including preparation, prior experiences, and confidence. Some residents expressed procedure-related anxiety and avoidance. Conclusion: Educational interventions aimed to improve procedural efficiency and ensure availability of supervisors may help facilitate residents to perform procedures, yet may not address procedure-related anxiety. Further study is required to understand better how procedure-averse residents can gain confidence to seek out procedures.

Contexte: Les résidents en médecine interne (MI) sont amenés à effectuer des procédures au chevet du patient à des fins diagnostiques et thérapeutiques. Les expériences des résidents en lien avec ces procédures varient considérablement, et ce sans raison évidente. Objectif: Explorer les expériences des résidents en MI lors des procédures effectuées au chevet du patient et identifier les facteurs qui entravent ou, au contraire, facilitent l'acquisition d'une expérience suffisante. Méthodes: En utilisant une approche inductive et thématique, nous avons mené cinq entrevues individuelles semi-structurées et un groupe de discussion avec sept résidents de MI (12 résidents au total) dans un centre de soins tertiaires canadien au cours de l'année universitaire 2017-2018. Nous avons utilisé des questions ouvertes itératives pour recueillir les expériences des résidents lors des procédures faites au chevet du patient, ainsi qu'identifier les obstacles et les facilitateurs de ces interventions. Les transcriptions d'entrevues ont été analysées pour identifier les thèmes émergents selon la méthode de Braun et Clarke. Résultats: Nous avons relevé quatre thèmes : 1) les facteurs spécifiques aux patients comme la morphologie du patient et l'urgence de la procédure; 2) les facteurs systémiques comme les contraintes de temps et l'accessibilité du matériel; 3) les facteurs liés corps professoral, notamment leur disponibilité pour superviser, leur niveau de confort et leur propension à orienter certaines procédures vers d'autres collègues; et 4) les facteurs spécifiques aux résidents, à savoir la préparation, les expériences antérieures et la confiance. Certains résidents ont exprimé vivre de l'anxiété face aux procédures et de l'évitement. Conclusion: Les initiatives éducatives visant à améliorer l'efficacité des procédures et à assurer la disponibilité de superviseurs peuvent faciliter leur réalisation par les résidents, mais elles peuvent ne pas atténuer l'anxiété reliée aux procédures. Des études supplémentaires sont nécessaires pour mieux comprendre comment accroître la confiance des résidents qui sont réticents face aux procédures au chevet du patient.

Psychological distress and lifestyle disruption in low-risk prostate cancer patients: Comparison between active surveillance and radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify distress in men treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) or active surveillance (AS). METHODS: In a retrospective cross-sectional design, we assessed men through questionnaire and investigator-designed questions. RESULTS: RP patients worried more about cancer spread than AS patients. RP patients were influenced by friends for treatment decision, whereas AS patients were influenced by urologists. RP group report declines in intimacy and instrumental. AS men worried more about future health and dying than post-RP men. CONCLUSION: Fear of disease progression may be a motivating factor in choosing RP. AS patients adhere to their treatment decision in spite of distress.

Real-Time MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound for Focal Therapy of Locally Confined Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Feasibility and Preliminary Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Focal therapy is an emerging approach to the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to report the 6-month follow-up oncologic and functional data of the initial phase 1 trial of patients treated with focal transrectal MRI-guided focused ultrasound in North America. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Four patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 10 ng/mL or less, tumor classification cT2a or less, and a Gleason score of 6 (3 + 3) were prospectively enrolled in the study and underwent multiparametric MRI and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate systematic biopsy. Under MRI guidance and real-time monitoring with MR thermography, focused high-frequency ultrasound energy was delivered to ablate the target tissue. The incidence and severity of treatment-related adverse events were recorded along with responses to serial quality-of-life questionnaires for 6 months after treatment. Oncologic outcomes were evaluated with multiparametric MRI and repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy 6 months after treatment. RESULTS: Four patients with a total of six target lesions were treated and had complications graded Clavien-Dindo I or less. Quality-of-life parameters were similar between baseline and 6-months. All four patients had normal MRI findings in the treated regions (100%), biopsy showed that three patients (75%) were clear of disease in the treated regions, representing complete ablation of five target lesions (83%). All patients had at least one Gleason 6-positive core outside of the treated zone. CONCLUSION: MRI-guided focused ultrasound is a feasible method of noninvasively ablating low-risk prostate cancers with low morbidity. Further investigation and follow-up are warranted in a larger patient series with appropriate statistical analysis of oncologic and functional outcome measures.

Health-related quality of life in robotic versus open radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear whether health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes are superior in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compared to open prostatectomy (ORP). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed records from men who received ORP or RARP at our institution between January 2009 and December 2012. Patients completed a demographics questionnaire and the Patient-Oriented Prostate Utility Scale (PORPUS), a validated disease-specific HRQoL instrument prior to surgery and every 3 months up to 15 months after surgery. RESULTS: In total, 974 men met the inclusion criteria (643 ORP and 331 RARP patients). At baseline, RARP patients were significantly younger (p < 0.001), had lower body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.001), lower preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (p < 0.001), fewer comorbidities (p < 0.004), and higher baseline PORPUS scores (p = 0.024). On follow-up, unadjusted PORPUS scores were significantly higher in the RARP group at each point. On multivariable analysis adjusting for age, ORP versus RARP procedure, Gleason score, BMI, first PSA, comorbidity, ethnicity, and baseline PORPUS scores, PORPUS score was higher for the RARP group at 3 months (p = 0.038) and 9 months (p = 0.037), but not at 6, 12, and 15 months (p = 0.014). No difference met pre-defined thresholds of clinical significant. CONCLUSIONS: Though unadjusted HRQoL outcomes appeared improved with RARP compared to ORP differences, adjusted differences were seen at only 2 of 5 postoperative time points, and did not meet pre-defined thresholds of clinical significance. Further randomized trials are needed to assess whether one treatment option provides consistently better HRQoL outcomes.

Mechatronic system for in-bore MRI-guided insertion of needles to the prostate: An in vivo needle guidance accuracy study.

BACKGROUND: To present our experiences in initial clinical evaluation of a novel mechatronic system for in-bore guidance of needles to the prostate for MRI-guided prostate interventions in 10 patients. We report accuracy of this device in the context of focal laser ablation therapy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: An MRI-compatible needle guidance device was developed for transperineal prostate interventions. Ten patients underwent MRI-guided focal laser ablation therapy with device-mediated laser fiber delivery. We recorded needle guidance error and needle delivery time. RESULTS: A total of 37 needle insertions were evaluated. Median needle guidance error was 3.5 mm (interquartile range, 2.1-5.4 mm), and median needle delivery time was 9 min (interquartile range, 6.5-12 min). CONCLUSION: This system provides a reliable method of accurately aligning needle guides for in-bore transperineal needle delivery to the prostate.

Prostate cancer screening characteristics in men with BRCA1/2 mutations attending a high-risk prevention clinic.

INTRODUCTION: The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era and resultant early detection of prostate cancer has presented clinicians with the challenge of distinguishing indolent from aggressive tumours. Mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes have been associated with prostate cancer risk and prognosis. We describe the prostate cancer screening characteristics of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, who may be classified as genetically-defined high risk, as compared to another high-risk cohort of men with a family history of prostate cancer to evaluate the utility of a targeted screening approach for these men. METHODS: We reviewed patient demographics, clinical screening characteristics, pathological features, and treatment outcomes between a group of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers and age-matched men with a family history of prostate cancer followed at our institutional Prostate Cancer Prevention Clinic from 1995 to 2012. RESULTS: Screening characteristics were similar between the mutation carriers (n = 53) and the family history group (n = 53). Some cancers would be missed in both groups by using a PSA cut-off of >4 ug/L. While cancer detection was higher in the family history group (21% vs. 15%), the mutation carrier group was more likely to have intermediate- or high-risk disease (88% vs. 36%). BRCA2 mutation carriers were more likely to have aggressive disease, biological recurrence, and distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, regular screening appears justified for detecting prostate cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers and other high-risk populations. Lowering PSA cut-offs and defining monitoring of PSA velocity as part of the screening protocol may be useful. BRCA2 is associated with more aggressive disease, while the outcome for BRCA1 mutation carriers requires further study. Large multinational studies will be important to define screening techniques for this unique high-risk population.

Health-related quality of life following radical prostatectomy: long-term outcomes.

PURPOSE: To identify the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) domains that radical prostatectomy (RP) impacts most negatively and to define the recovery of these domains over 30 months of observation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,200 RP patients completed the Patient-Oriented Prostate Utility Scale-Psychometric (PORPUS-P; range 0-100, higher is better), a prostate cancer-specific HRQoL measure, prior to RP and at 0-3 (T1), 3-9 (T2), 9-18 (T3) and 18-30 (T4) months post-RP. HRQoL changes were examined using paired t tests and a mixed-effect growth curve model. Multivariable analyses were performed to investigate demographic and treatment factors predicting the change in HRQoL. RESULTS: Mean baseline PORPUS-P score, 83.1, fell to 66.5 (p < 0.001) at T1. Over time HRQoL improved but did not return to baseline (T4 mean 76.4, p < 0.001). Domain analysis revealed that sexual function (p < 0.001), sexual drive (p < 0.001), energy (p = 0.001) and bladder control (p < 0.001) failed to return to baseline at T4. Sexual function demonstrated the greatest impairment overall. The multivariable model revealed Black men experienced greater losses in global HRQoL compared with White men (coefficient -2.77, 95% CI -5.00 to -0.54, p = 0.015). High baseline HRQoL, pro-erectile aid use and bilateral nerve-sparing were significantly associated with smaller reductions in HRQoL post-RP. CONCLUSION: Overall HRQoL, sexual drive, sexual function, energy and bladder control do not return to preoperative levels within 30 months post-RP. Black patients experience the greatest reductions in HRQoL. HRQoL losses may be ameliorated by use of pro-erectile aids. These findings help to identify at-risk patient populations and inform survivorship programs.

Concordance between transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy results and radical prostatectomy final pathology: Are we getting better at predicting final pathology?

INTRODUCTION: Inaccuracy in biopsy Gleason scoring poses a risk to men who may then receive inappropriate treatment. We assess whether there was a change in discordance rates between biopsy and radical prostatectomy at our institution in recent years, while considering the implementation of active surveillance and the shift in biopsy scores caused by the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology update to the Gleason scoring protocol. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution between May 2004 and April 2011. We analyzed clinical and pathological correlates of upgrading in 3 subgroups: Gleason sum (GS) 6/6, GS6/7 and GS7/7, where the sum preceding the dash was determined from biopsy and the subsequent sum was determined from the radical prostatectomy specimen. We applied the log-rank test and Cox model to a Kaplan Meier analysis of biochemical recurrence in the subgroups, and also mapped GS6/7 discordance over time. RESULTS: In total, 1717 patients met our inclusion criteria. The 3 subgroups had significantly different mean prostate-specific antigen, patient age, tumour volume, margin status, pathologic stage, prostate weight, transrectal ultrasound volume and rate of progression (p < 0.05). We noted a multiphasic trend with a fall in discordance after 2005. However, there was no sustained trend over the study period taken as a whole (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Although no sustained trend was observed, the falling discordance after 2005 may reflect the accommodation to the Gleason scoring update, while the gradual adoption of active surveillance may have led to the otherwise increasing trends. However, our observations may also be spurious biopsy sampling errors.

Exploring gay couples' experience with sexual dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: a qualitative study.

This exploratory study examines the experience of three gay couples managing sexual dysfunction as a result of undergoing a radical prostatectomy. Semi-structured interviews were conducted as part of a larger study at an urban hospital in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Interview transcripts were transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. The authors clustered 18 subordinate themes under 3 superordinate themes: (a) acknowledging change in sexual experience (libido, erectile function, sexual activity, orgasmic function); (b) accommodating change in sexual experience (strategies: emphasizing intimacy, embracing plan B, focus on the other; barriers: side-effect concerns, loss of naturalness, communication breakdown, failure to initiate, trial and failure, partner confounds); and (c) accepting change in sexual experience (indicators: emphasizing health, age attributions, finding a new normal; barriers: uncertain outcomes, treatment regrets). Although gay couples and heterosexual couples share many similar challenges, we discovered that gay men have particular sexual roles and can engage in novel accommodation practices, such as open relationships, that have not been noted in heterosexual couples. All couples, regardless of their level of sexual functioning, highlighted the need for more extensive programming related to sexual rehabilitation. Equitable rehabilitative support is critical to assist homosexual couples manage distress associated with prostatectomy-related sexual dysfunction.

Oncologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy in the active surveillance era.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examine the oncologic outcomes of men with low, intermediate and high preoperative risk for prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy prior to and during the active surveillance era. METHODS: We analyzed records from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our Canadian tertiary care facility from 2000 to 2012. Patients were stratified by D'Amico preoperative risk category and by year of treatment. Biochemical recurrence-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: We included 2643 consecutive patients in our analysis. The proportion of men with low-risk disease undergoing radical prostatectomy decreased from 2007 onwards coincident with the implementation of an active surveillance strategy in our institution. Men with low-risk and high-risk disease showed significantly worse biochemical outcomes from 2007 to 2012 compared to 2000 to 2006 (p < 0.05), while men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer showed no significant differences (p = 0.27). Within the low-risk cohort, the later treatment group displayed significantly lower age, pre-treatment prostate specific antigen and tumour volume and significantly higher testosterone and body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: The time period corresponding with the implementation of active surveillance at our institution corresponded with significant deterioration of biochemical outcomes in the low- and high-risk groups. This suggests that the men with most favourable disease deferred treatment, whereas men with worse preoperative disease characteristics were increasingly treated with radical prostatectomy in the past 6 years perhaps to their benefit.

The motility of the chicken embryo: energetic cost and effects of hypoxia.

We estimated the energetic cost of embryonic motility by relating the changes in embryo's motion to the changes in oxygen consumption (VO2). Measurements were conducted on chicken embryos between day 10 and 18 of incubation. Embryonic gross body movement was quantified over ten continuous 3-min periods from the pressure oscillations inside the egg, measured through an implanted catheter, and was correlated to the synchronous changes in VO2, measured by an open-flow methodology. Over the 30 min recording, movements could vary around the mean by up to four folds. The corresponding changes in VO2 were minuscule (0.116 µl O2/mmHg) or, for all age groups combined, only 2.3% of the mean VO2, ranging from ≈ 8% (day 10) to ≈ 0.5% (day 16). At E18, hypercapnia and cold respectively increased and decreased motility. Differently, the effects of hypoxia on motility were variable among embryos. It is concluded that, in chicken embryos over the age period investigated, the cost of motility represents an almost negligible fraction of the total energy budget. Because of its low cost, motility can be maintained in hypoxia; conversely, reduction of motility in hypoxia does not provide an important energy saving.