Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21260762

ABSTRACT

Patients with haematological malignancies are at increased risk of severe disease and death from COVID-19 and are less likely to mount humoral immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination, with the B cell malignancies a particularly high-risk group. Our COV-VACC study is evaluating the immune response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with B cell malignancies. Eligible patients were either receiving active treatment or had received treatment within the last 24 months. Patients were vaccinated with either the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) (n=41) or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) (n=14) vaccines. The median age of participants was 60 years (range: 27-82) and 50% were receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) at the time of vaccination. This interim analysis from the first 55 participants describes anti-S seropositivity rates, neutralising antibody activity and association with peripheral lymphocyte subsets. After the first vaccine dose, 36% overall had detectable anti-S antibodies rising to 42% after the second dose. Sera from seropositive patients was assessed for neutralisation activity in vitro. Of the seropositive patients after first dose (n=17), only 41% were able to neutralise SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped virus with a 50% inhibitory dilution factor (ID50) of >1:50. After two doses (n=21) 57% of the seropositive patients had detectable neutralisation activity (median ID50 of 1:469, range 1:70 - 1:3056). Total blood lymphocyte, CD19, CD4 and CD56 counts were significantly associated with seropositivity. Patients vaccinated more than 6 months after completing therapy were significantly more likely to develop antibodies than those within 6 months of treatment or on active treatment; OR: 5.93 (1.29 - 27.28). Our data has important implications for patients with B cell malignancies as we demonstrate a disconnect between anti-S seropositivity and virus neutralisation in vitro following vaccination against COVID-19. Urgent consideration should be given to revaccinating patients with B-cell malignancies after completion of anti-cancer treatment as large numbers currently remain at high risk of infection with the increasing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in many countries.

2.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20120584

ABSTRACT

BackgroundAlthough SARS-CoV-2 infection in Healthcare Workers (HCWs) is a public health concern, there is little description of their longitudinal antibody response in the presence or absence of SARS-CoV-2 and symptoms. We followed HCWs in an acute London hospital to measure seroconversion and RNA detection at the peak of the pandemic. MethodsWe enrolled 200 patient-facing HCWs between 26 March and 8 April 2020 and collected twice-weekly self-administered nose and throat swabs, symptom data and monthly blood samples. Swabs were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR, and serum for antibodies to spike protein by ELISA and flow cytometry. FindingsDuring the first month, 42/200 (21%) HCWs were PCR positive in at least one nose and throat swab. Only 8/42 HCW (19%) who were PCR positive during the study period had symptoms that met current case definition. Of 181 HCWs who provided enrollment and follow-up blood samples, 82/181 (45.3%) were seropositive. In 33 HCWs who had positive serology at baseline but were PCR negative, 32 remained PCR negative. One HCW had a PCR positive swab six days after enrollment, likely representing waning infection. ConclusionThe high seropositivity and RNA detection in these front-line HCWs brings policies to protect staff and patients into acute focus. Our findings have implications for planning for the second wave and for vaccination campaigns in similar settings. The evidence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection indicates that asymptomatic HCW surveillance is essential, while our study sets the foundations to answer pertinent questions around the duration of protective immune response and the risk of re-infection.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...