Post-traumatic stress disorder in parturients delivering by caesarean section and the implication of anaesthesia: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) occurs in 1-7% of women following childbirth. While having a caesarean section (C-section) is known to be a significant risk factor for postpartum PTSD, it is currently unknown whether coexisting anaesthesia-related factors are also associated to the disorder. The aim of this study was to assess anaesthesia-linked factors in the development of acute postpartum PTSD. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study on women having a C-section in a tertiary hospital in Switzerland. Patients were followed up six weeks postpartum. Patient and procedure characteristics, past morbidity or traumatic events, psychosocial status and stressful perinatal events were measured. Outcome was divided into two categories: full PTSD disease and PTSD profile. This was based on the number of DSM-IV criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition (DSM-IV) present. The PTSD Checklist Scale and the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale were used for measurement. RESULTS: Of the 280 patients included, 217 (77.5%) answered the questionnaires and 175 (62.5%) answered to an additional phone interview. Twenty (9.2%) had a PTSD profile and six (2.7%) a PTSD. When a full predictive model of risk factors for PTSD profile was built using logistic regression, maternal prepartum and intrapartum complications, anaesthetic complications and dissociative experiences during C-section were found to be the significant predictors for PTSD profile. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to show in parturients having a C-section that an anaesthesia complication is an independent risk factor for postpartum PTSD and PTSD profile development, in addition to known perinatal and maternal risk factors.

Atypical headache following dural puncture in obstetrics.

BACKGROUND: In obstetrics, post-dural puncture headache is a well-recognised complication. Typical symptoms include fronto-temporal or occipital headache, worsening with ambulation and improving in the decubitus position. Occasionally, patients present with non-postural headache, although relatively little is known about this atypical presentation. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence, associated signs and risk factors for this atypical manifestation of post-dural puncture headache. METHODS: We analysed a series of 27 064 parturients having a neuraxial procedure between January 2001 and December 2010. Using data from electronic anaesthesia patient records, medical charts and a postpartum quality audit, we identified all parturients with atypical post-dural puncture headache. We assessed the incidence and used uni- and multivariate analysis to identify associated risk factors. RESULTS: Amongst 142 parturients with post-dural puncture headache, eight (5.6%, 95% CI 1.7-9.4%) had atypical non-postural headache. Associated symptoms were stiffness and pain in the cervical, thoracic or lumbar vertebral area, visual disturbances and vertigo. Significant risk factors for developing atypical signs were previous migraine, odds ratio 6.1 (95% CI 1.2-28.7), a more cephalad level of needle insertion, odds ratio 17.2 (95% CI 1.4-210.1) and identification of dural puncture by aspiration of cerebrospinal fluid from the epidural catheter, odds ratio 5.5 (95% CI 1.2-24.4). Following multivariate analysis, recognition of dural puncture by aspiration of cerebrospinal fluid from the epidural catheter was the most significant predictor of non-orthostatic postdural puncture headache. CONCLUSION: Anaesthetists should be aware of this atypical clinical presentation, particularly if there is a past history of migraine, a more cephalad level of needle insertion or identification of dural puncture by aspiration of cerebrospinal fluid from the epidural catheter.