Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Infect Dis ; 107: 179-181, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33901651

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the QIAstat-Dx® Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel (QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2), which is a closed, fully automated, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay that detects severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and 21 other pathogens that cause respiratory disease. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs from patients with or suspected of having coronavirus disease 2019 were collected and tested at Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France. Using the World Health Organisation-approved real-time-PCR assay developed by the Charité Institute of Virology as the reference, positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 189 negative and 88 positive samples were analyzed. QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 had an NPA of 90.48% (95% confidence interval (CI), 85.37%, 94.26%) and a PPA of 94.32% (95% CI, 87.24%, 98.13%). Co-infections were detected by QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 in 4/277 specimens. The methods exhibited comparable failure rates (23/307 [7.5%] vs. 6/298 [2.0%] for QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 and reference methods, respectively). The turnaround time was shorter for QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 compared with the reference method (difference in mean -14:30 h [standard error, 0:03:23; 95% CI, -14:37, -14:24]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 shows good agreement with the reference assay, providing faster and accurate results for detecting SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Nasopharynx/virology , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
J Clin Virol ; 133: 104681, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33160178

ABSTRACT

In 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused a global pandemic. Disease diagnosis, appropriate clinical management and infection control are all important factors in controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2. The QIAreach™ Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total Test (Anti-CoV2) is a rapid, qualitative serological test, using proprietary nanoparticle fluorescence technology to detect total antibody (IgA, IgM, and IgG) against SARS-CoV-2. Here we report the results of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clinical agreement study. Thirty positive plasma or serum samples were taken from consenting individuals with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection ≥14 days from symptom onset. Seventy-five samples from before the believed circulation of SARS-CoV-2 (November 1, 2019) were used to assess specificity. Positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were calculated along with the corresponding exact two-sided 95 % confidence intervals (CI) using an FDA Emergency Use Authorized PCR test as the reference method. Anti-CoV2 was shown to have 100 % sensitivity (PPA; 95 % CI 88.4-100 %) and 100 % specificity (NPA; 95 % CI 95.2-100 %). Against 157 pre-pandemic samples, no cross-reactivity was observed with seasonal coronaviruses or other respiratory pathogens tested. Additionally, no interference was observed when samples were spiked with: conjugated bilirubin 0.4 mg/ml; unconjugated bilirubin 0.4 mg/ml; hemoglobin 5 mg/ml; prednisolone 0.12 mg/ml; triglycerides 15 mg/ml. In conclusion, Anti-CoV2 provides accurate qualitative detection of total antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Fluorescence , Nanoparticles , Digital Technology , Humans , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Sensitivity and Specificity , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence
3.
J Child Adolesc Trauma ; 12(1): 73-83, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32318181

ABSTRACT

A randomized control trial was used to evaluate the effectiveness of a home-based, parent-and-child therapy program specifically developed for toddlers and preschoolers living in poverty with trauma symptoms. Sixty-four children 5-years of age and younger were referred to a community-based clinic for behavior problems and emotional difficulties. All children had experienced one or more potentially traumatic events and met the DSM-5's criteria for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Children Six Years of Age and Younger. All families received government assistance indicating that their income met the federal definition for poverty. Participants were randomly assigned to either immediate treatment or wait list control groups. Significant between-group differences on all post-treatment measures were found. After the waitlist group completed treatment, significant improvements for both groups were found on all measures at six-weeks follow-up. Outcomes included reductions in challenging behaviors and emotional symptoms of trauma, improved caregiver-child relationships, and increased caregiver adherence to treatment strategies. This study offers support for early intervention of children with trauma symptoms and identifies the clinical challenges and advantages of providing therapy services in a home setting for very young children in poverty.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...