Real-world utilization of SARS-CoV-2 serological testing in RNA positive patients across the United States.

BACKGROUND: As diagnostic tests for COVID-19 were broadly deployed under Emergency Use Authorization, there emerged a need to understand the real-world utilization and performance of serological testing across the United States. METHODS: Six health systems contributed electronic health records and/or claims data, jointly developed a master protocol, and used it to execute the analysis in parallel. We used descriptive statistics to examine demographic, clinical, and geographic characteristics of serology testing among patients with RNA positive for SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: Across datasets, we observed 930,669 individuals with positive RNA for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 35,806 (4%) were serotested within 90 days; 15% of which occurred <14 days from the RNA positive test. The proportion of people with a history of cardiovascular disease, obesity, chronic lung, or kidney disease; or presenting with shortness of breath or pneumonia appeared higher among those serotested compared to those who were not. Even in a population of people with active infection, race/ethnicity data were largely missing (>30%) in some datasets-limiting our ability to examine differences in serological testing by race. In datasets where race/ethnicity information was available, we observed a greater distribution of White individuals among those serotested; however, the time between RNA and serology tests appeared shorter in Black compared to White individuals. Test manufacturer data was available in half of the datasets contributing to the analysis. CONCLUSION: Our results inform the underlying context of serotesting during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and differences observed between claims and EHR data sources-a critical first step to understanding the real-world accuracy of serological tests. Incomplete reporting of race/ethnicity data and a limited ability to link test manufacturer data, lab results, and clinical data challenge the ability to assess the real-world performance of SARS-CoV-2 tests in different contexts and the overall U.S. response to current and future disease pandemics.

A Zika Reference Panel for Molecular-Based Diagnostic Devices as a US Food and Drug Administration Response Tool to a Public Health Emergency.

In 2015, Zika virus (ZIKV) appeared as an emerging pathogen, generating a global and urgent need for accurate diagnostic devices. During this public health crisis, several nucleic acid testing (NAT)-based Zika assays were submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization. The FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, in collaboration with the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, responded to this Zika emergency by developing and producing a reference panel (RP) for Zika RNA (Zika FDA-RP) suitable for performance assessment of ZIKV NAT-based in vitro diagnostic devices. Reference panels are a fundamental tool for performance assessment of molecular tests. The panel is composed of five vials: two different heat-inactivated ZIKV strains (PRVABC59 and FSS13025) in concentrated stocks and three blinded concentrations prepared from those strains. The Zika FDA-RP was shared with developers who had devices in the final stages of validation. In vitro diagnostic developers tested the Zika FDA-RP using the FDA-provided protocol. Depending on sample type, 85% (12/14) of the NAT assays had analytical sensitivities between 500 and 5000 RNA NAT-detectable units/mL (NDUs/mL). One device showed better performance (100 NDUs/mL), and another one showed lower performance (10,000 to 30,000 NDUs/mL). Vials of the Zika FDA-RP are available on request to developers who have interacted with the FDA through the review process.

FDA-ARGOS is a database with public quality-controlled reference genomes for diagnostic use and regulatory science.

FDA proactively invests in tools to support innovation of emerging technologies, such as infectious disease next generation sequencing (ID-NGS). Here, we introduce FDA-ARGOS quality-controlled reference genomes as a public database for diagnostic purposes and demonstrate its utility on the example of two use cases. We provide quality control metrics for the FDA-ARGOS genomic database resource and outline the need for genome quality gap filling in the public domain. In the first use case, we show more accurate microbial identification of Enterococcus avium from metagenomic samples with FDA-ARGOS reference genomes compared to non-curated GenBank genomes. In the second use case, we demonstrate the utility of FDA-ARGOS reference genomes for Ebola virus target sequence comparison as part of a composite validation strategy for ID-NGS diagnostic tests. The use of FDA-ARGOS as an in silico target sequence comparator tool combined with representative clinical testing could reduce the burden for completing ID-NGS clinical trials.

Gingival esthetic outcome around a bone-level implant--a case report.

The objective of this case report is to review the clinical thinking, decision making, and actions of the authors, from the time of the first patient visit to the final esthetic outcome. Initial uncertainty led the authors to perform procedures that were believed to provide best outcomes or alternatives for further procedures, if necessary. An optimal final esthetic outcome was the goal, and the short-term (one-year) esthetic results are presented.