Review of postoperative bleeding risk in dental patients on antiplatelet therapy.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a review of the literature to assess risk for oral bleeding complications after dental procedures in patients on antiplatelet therapy. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a search in Medline, Embase, and National Guideline Clearinghouse databases for studies involving patients on single and dual antiplatelet therapy that had invasive dental procedures or manipulations that induce oral bleeding. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 15 studies that met inclusion criteria. There is a trend toward increased occurrence of immediate postoperative bleeding for dual antiplatelet therapy, but there is no increase in the occurrence of intra- or late postoperative bleeding complications. CONCLUSIONS: We found no clinically significant increased risk of postoperative bleeding complications from invasive dental procedures in patients on either single or dual antiplatelet therapy. These findings support the recommendation that there is no indication to alter or stop these drugs, and that local hemostatic measures are sufficient to control bleeding.

The evidence base for the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in dental practice.

INTRODUCTION: People with various medical conditions and devices are suggested candidates for receiving antibiotic prophylaxis before undergoing dental procedures. This practice is controversial, however, owing to the lack of proof of efficacy. The authors conducted a qualitative, systematic review to determine the level of evidence for this practice and whether antibiotic prophylaxis prevents distant site infections in these patients. METHODS: The authors selected eight groups of patients with specific medical conditions and devices who often are given antibiotic prophylaxis before undergoing invasive dental procedures. The conditions and devices were cardiac-native heart valve disease, prosthetic heart valves and pacemakers; hip, knee and shoulder prosthetic joints; renal dialysis shunts; cerebrospinal fluid shunts; vascular grafts; immunosuppression secondary to cancer and cancer chemotherapy; systemic lupus erythematosus; and insulin-dependent (type 1) diabetes mellitus. The authors thoroughly searched the literature for the years 1966 through 2005 for references indicating some level of support for this practice and graded each publication on the basis of level of evidence. RESULTS: The authors found formal recommendations in favor of antibiotic prophylaxis for only three of the eight medical conditions: native heart disease, prosthetic heart valves and prosthetic joints. They found no prospective randomized clinical trials and only one clinical study of antibiotic prophylaxis. Only one systematic review and two case series provided weak, if any, support for antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cardiac conditions. The authors found little or no evidence to support this practice or to demonstrate that it prevents distant site infections for any of these eight groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: No definitive, scientific basis exists for the use of prophylactic antibiotics before dental procedures for these eight groups of patients.