Diverticulitis and Diverticulosis of the Appendix: A Case Series.

Introduction Diverticula of the appendix is a rare entity, may be complicated by inflammation/infection, and clinically mimics acute appendicitis. The reported associated risk factors include male gender, Hirschprung's disease, cystic fibrosis and adult age, where some reports claim that they are also associated with an increased risk of appendiceal malignancy. Imaging has a place in pre-operative diagnosis, however, most of the cases were diagnosed during a pathological examination after surgery. They are associated with a higher rate of perforation (more than four times compared with classical acute appendicitis). In this review, we present a case series of five patients diagnosed with diverticulitis and one with diverticulosis of the appendix that were managed at a single centre. Our aim is to explore the common clinical, radiological, and intra-operative findings associated with this disease as well as the outcome of management. Materials and methods A total number of six cases of diverticular disease of the appendix diagnosed and managed at Basildon University hospital in the period between 2016 and 2020 were studied. The demographic details and clinical data including presenting symptoms, laboratory results, radiological characteristics, intraoperative findings and histopathological features were analysed. Results The study group included four males and two females, with an age range of 20-84 years. The most common presenting clinical symptoms were right iliac fossa abdominal pain, nausea, anorexia, and diarrhoea. Half of the cases showed a thickened appendix in the pre-operative CT scan. An inflamed or perforated appendix was seen in five cases as well as inflammation of the diverticula. Conclusion Appendiceal diverticulitis is an uncommon pathology that imitates acute appendicitis, and appendicectomy is the standard treatment. Prophylactic appendicectomy is recommended for non-inflamed diverticula - this is due to the potential risk of inflammation, perforation, and the risk of developing an appendiceal neoplasm.

Chronic Pain as a Complication in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Study of Consenting Practice in a Single Centre.

Introduction Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed procedures in general surgery in the United Kingdom. Chronic pain as a long-term postoperative complication of this procedure has been extensively documented in the literature. However, this complication is often undisclosed during the consenting process. This omission impairs the patients' informed decision-making process. The Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board case, in 2015, changed the way in which patient consent is viewed legally. This has made proper consent practices more important to surgeons undertaking procedures. Aim The objective is to assess if there has been an improvement in consenting practices by comparing consent forms from 2015 (the year of the Montgomery ruling) and 2019, specifically in regard to the risk of chronic groin pain following open inguinal hernia repair with mesh. Methods This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent open inguinal hernia repair using a prosthetic mesh in 2015 and 2019. The medical records were retrieved on the trust's electronic medical record system using the patient's hospital number. The following parameters were obtained: patient demographics, preoperative clinic letters, operation notes and consent forms. The clinic letters and consent forms were systematically reviewed for any mention of chronic groin pain. Results In 2015 and 2019, 163 and 56 open inguinal hernia repairs with mesh were performed, respectively. The median age of patients was 63 (28-88) and 64.5 (19-88) in the respective years. Throughout both years there was a predominance in male patients, and the majority of cases were performed on an elective basis. Consent for chronic pain was present in 60.7% and 62.5% of cases in 2015 and 2019, respectively (p=0.055). Conclusion Despite the importance of adequate consenting practice, we found no significant improvement in consenting practice for chronic pain following open inguinal hernia repair in the four years following the Montgomery ruling.

Instituting a Green Zone for Elective Surgery During the Second Wave of COVID-19.

Objective Elective surgery came to a standstill during the first wave of COVID-19. The safe resumption of elective surgery with COVID-19 prevalent in the community remains a significant challenge. The aim of this study was to look into the outcomes of elective general surgery in a dedicated 'Green Zone (GZ)' during the second wave of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom. Method A 'Green Zone' pathway, meant to provide a COVID-free environment, was created. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was done on consecutive patients who underwent an elective general surgical procedure at a single NHS trust over a six-month period (September 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021). The primary outcome was 30-day COVID-19 mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day non-COVID-19 mortality, readmissions, and complications. Results The study included 331 patients with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range, IQR, 41-67); 169 (51%) were females. The majority of the patients were American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade 2 (ASA 2; n=177, 53%) followed by ASA 3 (n=76, 23%). Forty-seven patients (14%) had been shielding earlier in the year. Most of the cases were day cases (n=224, 67%). There was no 30-day COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 mortality. One patient developed COVID-19 three weeks after the index operation. Thirty-day readmission and complication rate were 4% (n=14) and 6% (n=21). Most of the complications were Clavien-Dindo grade 2 (n=10, 3%) followed by an equal number of grades 1 and 3b (n=5, 1.5%). Conclusion This study has shown that a dedicated 'Green Zone' elective operating pathway is safe and feasible provided a balanced risk assessment approach is adopted.

The Challenge of COVID-19: The Biological Characteristics and Outcomes in a Series of 130 Breast Cancer Patients Operated on During the Pandemic.

Background: The worldwide outbreak of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) emerged in Wuhan, China close to the end of 2019. We analyse the clinical characteristics and management outcomes of a small group of patients who have been treated in the early stage of the COVID-19 disease, and discuss the impact of the pandemic on the service delivered to breast cancer patients. Material Methods: We analysed a cohort of 130 breast cancer patients who underwent elective surgical procedures during the early period of COVID-19. The patients were operated on in the period from March 16th, 2020 to May 18th, 2020. Results: All the patients were female, with an age range of 33-88 years, with a median age of 57.6 years. Most of the cases were admitted as a day case surgery after passing through a preoperative screening pathway, which was developed gradually. Patients were contacted by phone after their surgery to ensure that they have had no symptoms and were reviewed in person two weeks after the procedure with histology results. Only one patient developed COVID-19 symptoms after surgery and recovered. Conclusions: Early and careful implementation of modified practice policies during emerging situation of viral pandemics will reduce the risk of perioperative complications, reduce the risk of patient to staff to patient transmission and minimize the negative impact of COVID-19 on breast cancer management.

The e-CRABEL score: an updated method for auditing medical records.

In 2001 the CRABEL score was devised in order to obtain a numerical score of the standard of medical note keeping. With the advent of electronic discharge letters, many components of the CRABEL score are now redundant as computers automatically include some documentation. The CRABEL score was modified to form the e-CRABEL score. "Patient details on discharge letter" and "Admission and discharge dates on discharge letter" were replaced with "Summary of investigations on discharge letter" and "Documentation of VTE prophylaxis on the drug chart". The new e-CRABEL score has been used as a monthly audit tool in a busy surgical unit to monitor long-term standards of medical note keeping, with interventions of presenting in the departmental audit meeting, and giving a teaching session to a group of junior doctors at two points. Following discussion with stakeholders: junior doctors, consultants, and the audit department; it was decided that the e-CRABEL tool was sufficiently compact to be completed on a monthly basis. Critique and interventions included using photographic examples, case note selection and clarification of the e-CRABEL criteria in a teaching session. Tools used for audit need to be updated in order to accurately represent what they measure, hence the modification of the CRABEL score to make the new e-CRABEL score. Preliminary acquisition and presentation of data using the e-CRABEL score has shown promise in improving the quality of medical record keeping. The tool is sufficiently compact as to conduct on a monthly basis, maintaining standards to a high level and also provides data on VTE documentation.

Intussuscepting Ampullary Adenoma: An Unusual Cause of Gastric Outlet Obstruction Leading to Cavitating Lung Lesions.

Ampullary adenomas are a rare clinical entity, occurring at a rate of 0.04-0.12% in the general population. They are premalignant lesions which have the capability to progress to malignancy, and they should be excised if they are causing immediate symptoms and/or are likely to degenerate to carcinoma. Intestinal intussusception in adults is rare and, unlike in children, is often due to a structural pathology. Intussuscepting duodenal/ampullary adenomas have been reported in the literature on 13 previous occasions, however never before with this presentation. We report the case of a woman who presented with a 1-year history of recurrent chest infections. She was treated with numerous antibiotics, whilst intermittent symptoms of recurrent vomiting and weight loss were initially attributed to her lung infections. A chest CT demonstrated multiple cavitating lung lesions, whilst an obstructing polypoid mass was noted at D2 on dedicated abdominal imaging. Due to ongoing nutritional problems, she had a semi-urgent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Intraoperative findings demonstrated a large mass at D2 with a duodeno-duodenal intussusception. Histological analysis reported a duodenal, ampullary, low-grade tubular adenoma, 75 × 28 × 30 mm in size, with intussusception and complete resection margins. The patient recovered well and was discharged on postoperative day 10, with no complications to date. Ampullary adenomas may present with obstruction of the main gastrointestinal tract and/or biliary/pancreatic ducts. Common presentations include gastric outlet obstruction, gastrointestinal bleeding or acute pancreatitis. This unique presentation should remind clinicians of the need to investigate recurrent chest infections for a possible gastrointestinal cause.

Benign ancient schwannoma of the abdominal wall: an unwanted birthday present.

BACKGROUND: There has been a recent growth in the use of whole body Computerised Tomography (CT) scans in the private sector as a screening test for asymptomatic disease. This is despite scant evidence to show any positive effect on morbidity or mortality. There has been concern raised over the possible harms of the test in terms of radiation exposure as well as the risk and anxiety of further investigation and treatment for the large numbers of benign lesions identified. CASE PRESENTATION: A healthy 64 year old lady received a privately funded whole body CT scan for her birthday which revealed an incidental mass in the right iliac fossa. This was investigated with further imaging and colonoscopy and as confident diagnosis could not be made, eventually excised. Histology demonstrated this to be a benign ancient schwannoma and we believe this to be the first reported case of an abdominal wall schwannoma in the English literature CONCLUSIONS: Ancient schwannomas are rare tumours of the peripheral nerve sheaths more usually found in the head, neck and flexor surfaces of extremities. They are a subtype of classical schwannomas with a predominance of degenerative changes. Our case highlights the pitfalls of such screening tests in demonstrating benign disease and subjecting patients to what turns out to be unnecessary invasive investigation and treatment. It provides evidence as to the consequences of the large number of false positive results that are created by blind CT scanning of asymptomatic patients i.e. its tendency to detect pseudodiesease rather than affect survival rates. Should the number of scans increase there may be an unnecessary burden on NHS resources due to the large numbers of benign lesions picked up, that are then referred for further investigation.